Requirement for the PDZ Domain Protein, INAD, for Localization of the TRP Store- Operated Channel to a Signaling Complex  Jorge Chevesich, Andrew J. Kreuz,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bifocal Is a Downstream Target of the Ste20-like Serine/Threonine Kinase Misshapen in Regulating Photoreceptor Growth Cone Targeting in Drosophila  Wenjing.
Advertisements

Anura Rambukkana, James L Salzer, Peter D Yurchenco, Elaine I Tuomanen 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
A Conserved Oligomerization Domain in Drosophila Bazooka/PAR-3 Is Important for Apical Localization and Epithelial Polarity  Richard Benton, Daniel St.
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Zdena Harder, Rodolfo Zunino, Heidi McBride  Current Biology 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (May 1998)
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
Elias T. Spiliotis, Manuel Osorio, Martha C. Zúñiga, Michael Edidin 
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages S (December 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Erica E. Rosenbaum, Roger C. Hardie, Nansi J. Colley  Neuron 
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
A Tripartite Protein Complex with the Potential to Couple Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis to Cell Adhesion in Brain  Stefan Butz, Masaya Okamoto, Thomas C.
Suppression of Constant-Light-Induced Blindness but Not Retinal Degeneration by Inhibition of the Rhodopsin Degradation Pathway  Seung-Jae Lee, Craig.
Robert L.S Perry, Maura H Parker, Michael A Rudnicki  Molecular Cell 
Interaction of BP180 (Type XVII Collagen) and α6 Integrin is Necessary for Stabilization of Hemidesmosome Structure  Susan B. Hopkinson, Kirk Findlay,
The Spinal Muscular Atrophy Disease Gene Product, SMN, and Its Associated Protein SIP1 Are in a Complex with Spliceosomal snRNP Proteins  Qing Liu, Utz.
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Zijing Chen, Hsiang-Chin Chen, Craig Montell  Cell Reports 
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Yang Shen, Monica Naujokas, Morag Park, Keith Ireton  Cell 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
WNK1 Phosphorylates Synaptotagmin 2 and Modulates Its Membrane Binding
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Seung-Jae Lee, Craig Montell  Neuron 
The Drosophila CLOCK Protein Undergoes Daily Rhythms in Abundance, Phosphorylation, and Interactions with the PER–TIM Complex  Choogon Lee, Kiho Bae,
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
Jorge A. Garces, Imran B. Clark, David I. Meyer, Richard B. Vallee 
Heterochromatin Formation in Mammalian Cells
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Molecular Consequences of Deletion of the Cytoplasmic Domain of Bullous Pemphigoid 180 in a Patient with Predominant Features of Epidermolysis Bullosa.
TRADD–TRAF2 and TRADD–FADD Interactions Define Two Distinct TNF Receptor 1 Signal Transduction Pathways  Hailing Hsu, Hong-Bing Shu, Ming-Gui Pan, David.
Yi-Ping Hsueh, Eunjoon Kim, Morgan Sheng  Neuron 
PHYL Acts to Down-Regulate TTK88, a Transcriptional Repressor of Neuronal Cell Fates, by a SINA-Dependent Mechanism  Amy H Tang, Thomas P Neufeld, Elaine.
The Formation of Stable Rhodopsin-Arrestin Complexes Induces Apoptosis and Photoreceptor Cell Degeneration  Paul G. Alloway, Louisa Howard, Patrick J.
Seung-Jae Lee, Hong Xu, Lin-Woo Kang, L.Mario Amzel, Craig Montell 
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Silva H Hanissian, Raif S Geha  Immunity 
PAR-1 Kinase Plays an Initiator Role in a Temporally Ordered Phosphorylation Process that Confers Tau Toxicity in Drosophila  Isao Nishimura, Yufeng Yang,
Specific Disruption of a Schwann Cell Dystrophin-Related Protein Complex in a Demyelinating Neuropathy  Diane L Sherman, Cinzia Fabrizi, C.Stewart Gillespie,
Zu-Lin Chen, Sidney Strickland  Cell 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Michael J. Lee, Henrik G. Dohlman  Current Biology 
Bih-Hwa Shieh, Mei-Ying Zhu  Neuron 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
N-Terminal Palmitoylation of PSD-95 Regulates Association with Cell Membranes and Interaction with K+ Channel Kv1.4  J.Rick Topinka, David S Bredt  Neuron 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Elias T. Spiliotis, Manuel Osorio, Martha C. Zúñiga, Michael Edidin 
Alain Verreault, Paul D. Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman 
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Presentation transcript:

Requirement for the PDZ Domain Protein, INAD, for Localization of the TRP Store- Operated Channel to a Signaling Complex  Jorge Chevesich, Andrew J. Kreuz, Craig Montell  Neuron  Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 95-105 (January 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0

Figure 1 TRP and INAD Localization in Wild-Type and InaDP215 ommatidia Cross sections of adult eyes, obtained from 1- to 3-day-old dark-reared adults, were sectioned and stained with either TRP or INAD antibodies. (A) Sections from wild-type and InaDP215 flies (indicated to the left of the panels) stained with α-TRP antibodies and FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies. The left panels show the immunofluorescence (IF), and the right panels show the phase contrast (Phase). CB, cell body; CM, central matrix; and R, rhabdomere. (B) Wild-type and InaDP215 sections (indicated above the panels) stained with α-INAD antibodies. Neuron 1997 18, 95-105DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0)

Figure 2 InaDP215 Photoreceptor Cells Undergo Degeneration Thin sections of compound eyes were prepared from 25-day-old flies and viewed by transmission electron microscopy. (A) and (D) Wild-type (w1118) (B) and (E) w; InaDP215 (C) and (F) w; trpP301. Insets in (E) and (F) are higher magnification views showing blebbing at ends of microvilli (indicated by arrowheads). (A–C) and (D–F) are the same magnifications. Scale bars in (A), (D), and the insets are 3, 1, and 0.5 μM, respectively. Neuron 1997 18, 95-105DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0)

Figure 3 Drosophila INAD Binds NORPA (A) Extracts from wild-type (wt)trpP301 (trp)trpl302 (trpl), and norpAP24 (norpA) heads were fractionated by SDS–PAGE (6% gel), transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with full-length INAD protein labeled in vitro with 35S. (B) Filter shown in (A) was stripped of the 35S-labeled INAD and reprobed with antibodies to NORPA and 125I-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG. (C) Filter shown in (B) was stripped of the anti-NORPA antibodies and reprobed with antibodies to the two NINAC proteins and 125I-labeled protein A. Protein molecular weight size markers (kDa) are shown to the left of (A). Neuron 1997 18, 95-105DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0)

Figure 4 TRP Coimmunoprecipitates with NORPA or RH1 Extracts from wild-type (wt) or InaDP215 (InaD) heads were prepared and used for the immunoprecipitations. After immunoprecipitating with either α-NORPA or α-RH1 antibodies, the immunocomplexes were fractionated by SDS–PAGE (6% gel) and transferred to PVDF membranes. (A) Extracts were immunoprecipitated with α-NORPA antibodies, and the filter was probed with anti-TRP. The position of the TRP signal is indicated in the top lane. The same filter was reprobed with anti-NORPA after stripping the α-TRP antibodies (bottom lane). (B) Wild-type (wt) and InaDP215 (InaD) extracts were immunoprecipitated with α-RH1 antibodies or nonimmune serum (NIS), and the PVDF membrane was probed with anti-TRP antibodies. The position of the TRP signal in the top lane is indicated. The same filter was reprobed with anti-RH1 antibodies after stripping the α-TRP antibodies (bottom lane). RH1, boiled in SDS–sample buffer, forms a heterogeneous population of multimers. Shown is the dimer form of RH1. Neuron 1997 18, 95-105DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0)

Figure 5 TRP and INAD Binds to Calmodulin–Agarose Extracts were prepared from wild-type heads, incubated with calmodulin–agarose in the presence (+) or absence (−) of Ca2+, washed, and the bound (B) and unbound (U) fractions were fractionated by SDS–PAGE (6% gel). (A) Extracts were incubated for 60 min with the calmodulin–agarose and probed with α-TRP antibodies. (B) Extracts were incubated for 5 min with calmodulin–agarose and probed with α-INAD antibodies. Neuron 1997 18, 95-105DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0)

Figure 6 TRP Binds to Calmodulin in a Gel Overlay Assay Various portions of TRP were fused to either β-galactosidase or GST, fractionated by SDS–PAGE (10% gel), and probed with biotinylated calmodulin. (A) Schematic of TRP fusion proteins. The full-length TRP protein, with the six putative transmembrane domains, is indicated. The open boxes (1, 3, 4, and 5) indicate the fusions that failed to bind calmodulin, and the closed box (2) indicates the fusion that bound calmodulin. The following list indicates β-galactosidase (β) or GST fusions (G). The TRP residues are listed in parentheses: 1) G-(1–333); 2) β-(683–976); 3) G-(976–1275); 4) β-(998–1120); and 5) β-(1160–1275). Due to differences in the molecular weights of β-gal and GST (116 and 29 kDa, respectively), the sizes of the β-gal and GST TRP fusion proteins varied considerably. (B) Total E. coli extracts, expressing one TRP fusion protein (1–5), or β-gal (β) or GST (G) alone, were fractionated by SDS–PAGE (10% gel) and stained with Coomassie-blue. The GST and β-gal proteins and fusions are indicated in each lane by the open and closed arrowheads, respectively. The molecular weights of GST and β-gal are indicated to the right in kDa. (C) Gel identical to (B), except the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with biotinylated calmodulin. Neuron 1997 18, 95-105DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0)

Figure 7 Spatial Localization of Signaling Proteins All panels show immunofluorescence resulting from staining with indicated primary antibodies and FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies. (A) Cross sections of adult wild-type or InaDP215 (indicated at the top of the panels) ommatidia were stained with antibodies to either RH1 (α-RH1) or NORPA (α-PLC) (indicated to the left of the panels) and an FITC-labeled secondary antibody. (B) Sections of inaC and norpAP24 ommatidia (indicated to the top of the panels) were stained with α-TRP antibodies. Neuron 1997 18, 95-105DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0)

Figure 8 A Speculative Model of the TRP Signaling Complex TRP binds directly to calmodulin and INAD and indirectly to NORPA and RH1 via INAD. Evidence that the TRP interaction with NORPA and RH1 is through INAD is that TRP does not coimmunoprecipitate with these proteins in InaDP215 flies. INAC binds INAD (Huber et al. 1996) and is therefore proposed to be part of the complex. The DGq trimeric G protein (Gqα, β, and γ) is proposed to transiently interact with the complex. Neuron 1997 18, 95-105DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(01)80049-0)