What is God God = df ‘a single divine being that has all of the following properties: a) All-Powerful b) All-knowing c) Perfectly Good d) Eternal e) First.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Ontological Argument
Advertisements

General Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God The argument that an all-powerful, all- knowing, and perfectly good God would not allow any—or.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
Is Religion Reasonable? Are religious beliefs (about the universe’s relation to the supernatural) reasonable? Faith seeking understanding: ontological,
Chapter 12: Is There a God?.
Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
Ontological Argument for God Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument Define the terms: Ontology, Analytic, Synthetic, God. Recall Psalm 14:1. Define God in Anselm’s terms. Summarise Anselm’s Ontological.
The Problem of Evil and Suffering
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 2 The Cosmological Argument.
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
PHL 201 Problems of Philosophy March 25 th Chapter Five, ‘God’
Perspectives on Religious Belief: Evidentialism-1  Definition: belief in God must be supported by objective evidence  Natural theology: attempt to prove.
Philosophy of Religion What is religion? “Religion is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as.
Faith & Reason Arguments for God’s Existence. The Two Ways of ‘Knowing’ God  Pure Reason: Many philosophers have created proofs using logic to prove.
Category 1Category 2Category 3Category 4Category
Is God a Deceiver? (P1)The idea I have of God is of an infinitely perfect being. (P2)The cause of such an idea must itself be infinitely perfect. (P3)Therefore,
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God August 15, 2015 George Cronk, J.D., Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy & Religion Bergen Community College.
Just Looking … What Evidence is there for the Existence of God?
Arguments against the existence of God Do you believe in God? Why or why not?
Anselm & Aquinas. Anselm of Canterbury ( AD) The Ontological Argument for the Existence of God (Text, pp )
Meditations: 3 & 4.
Give definitions Give an opinion and justify that opinion Explain religious attitudes Respond to a statement – 2 sides.
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
Philosophy of Religion What is religion? “Religion is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as.
WHEN CHRISTIANS GET IT WRONG When Bad Things Happen.
Philosophy Here and Now: chapter two
Arguments based on observation Arguments based on reason
Arguments For and Against
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 1
Gaunilo’s response the stage one of Anselm’s argument
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
A Response To The Problem of Evil
Intuition and deduction thesis (rationalism)
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument
Other versions of the ontological argument
Philosophy MAP 2 and new topic The Idea of God
Problem of Evil: Why is there suffering in the world?
Unit 2: Arguments relating to the existence of God.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil
AO1 Comparison questions
The ontological argument: an a-priori argument (ie, deductive rather than inductive) Anselm ‘God’ is that being than which nothing greater can be conceived’;
Descartes’ Ontological Argument
Faith 101 Discovering the Faith
Lecture 18: God and Reason
Descartes’ proof of the external world
Reasons for doubting the existence of God
Religion and Ethics 1. Does morality depend on religion?
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
Is Religion Reasonable?
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
The Ontological Argument Aim: To explore the attributes of God.
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
Philosophy of Religion (natural theology)
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil
Explore the use of a’priori reasoning in the ontological argument
THE DEBATE BETWEEN COPLESTON AND RUSSELL.
Starter for 5! How does free will defend God against the evil in the world? What is the difference between moral and natural evil? How does David Hume.
What is the difference between a cabbage and a machine?
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
The Ontological Argument
Omnipotent Deity Atheist Agnostic Omnibenevolent Polytheist Analogy
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore the weaknesses of the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Clarify the key ideas Logic Definition Premises Outline opinion Flawed
Presentation transcript:

What is God God = df ‘a single divine being that has all of the following properties: a) All-Powerful b) All-knowing c) Perfectly Good d) Eternal e) First Cause and Creator of all good things.’

Philosophy of Religion (natural theology) It is not religion, it’s philosophy. Uses reason alone to consider whether religious claims are believable or unbelievable __ Does God exist?

Does God Exist?

The Cosmological Argument P1: All events have a cause P2: The chain of causes cannot go on for ever P3: From P1 –P2, there must be some first Cause P4: The first cause would not have limits, so it would be all-powerful, all-knowing, etc P5: P4 Is the definition of God ----------------------------------------------------------- C: God exists

Objections 1. Why can’t the causes go back forever? 2. Why should we conclude that the first cause meets the description of God?

Descartes’ Ontological Argument P1: I find in my head a number of ideas. P2: The concept of God is the idea of a supremely perfect being (all knowing, all powerful, perfectly Good) P3: Clearly this idea cannot come from me or anything that I have experiences in this world, since both me and the objects in the world are not perfect. P4: A Supremely Perfect being is the only possible cause of my idea of it, so it must exist. ------------------------------------------------------------- C: God exists

St. Anselm’s Ontological argument P1: God is ‘that which than nothing greater can be conceived.’ (all-knowing, all-powerful, perfectly good) P2: Ideas that are also things that exist in the real world are better than ideas that exist in our imagination only P3: If God only existed in my imagination, then there could be something greater than the idea of God, namely a God that does exist. P4: But, there cannot be anything greater than God (see premise 1) -------------------------------------------------------------------- C: So God must exist.

The Design Argument P1: All well built machines were made by intelligent beings P2: The universe is much like a well built machine ______________________________________ C: The Universe probably was made by an intelligent being, namely God.

Objections It is not so clear that the universe is like a machine Even if the universe has a designer we can’t say anything about what that designer is like, or even if there is only one, so why call it “God”?

The Watchmaker P1: Something as a complex as a watch could not have come to be by accident. Someone had to have made that thing for a clear purpose. P2: Living organisms are even more complicated than watches (look how well they fit their environment!). C: So, living organism must have been designed for a clear purpose too

Charles Darwin The Theory of Evolution through natural selection Origin of the Species 1859 Organisms change Some changes are better suited to the environment and some are not Organisms that are well adapted to their environment live and pass on their genes. Organisms that are not well-adapted die off The Organisms that live on produce little versions of themselves. Given millions and even billions years the changes brought about by this process will quite dramatic

The Argument from Experience P1: Many people claim to have experienced the reality of God, even to have a relationship with God P2: Many of these are very sensible, sane, trustworthy people P3: We should trust something if many sane, sensible, and trustworthy people attest to it C: God exists

Objections We can be very mistaken about what we think we perceive People have a tremendous capacity to fool themselves

The Problem of Evil (Pain & Suffering) P1: God is said to be all-knowing, all-powerful, and perfectly loving and good P2: God must know about all pain and suffering P3: God could prevent all pain and suffering P4: God would want to prevent all pain and suffering P5: There is a ton of pain and suffering ----------------------------------------------------- C: There is probably no God

Defending God from the Problem of Evil There is a difference between a defense and theodicy: a defense is a possible reason why God permits evil; whereas, a theodicy is a claim to actually know that reason. Defense 1: Pain is necessary as part of the body’s warning system. Defense 2: God allows evil to exist, in order to bring about a greater good. Defense 3: Suffering is punishment for sin.

The Free Will Defense P1: In order to create true human persons, God had to create people with free will P2: People with Free Will sometimes cause pain and suffering P3: God then, could not eliminating suffering and pain without taking way free will. P4: But a world without free will would not have love, and thus be worse than a world with free will C: So, God must allow pain, suffering, and evil

Expanding the Free Will Defense What about natural evils? Somehow human actions cause all the natural evils. Natural evils are the work of “The Devil” and his demons.

The Moral Character Defense P1: The Purpose of human life is to develop into a mature, virtuous, moral person. P2: If God put us in a “perfect” world, with no struggle, pain, and loss, we would never develop into what we should be. C: So we need pain and suffering to become what we are meant to be

Objection to the Moral Character argument What about people, and other beings, that cannot be improved through their pain and suffering? Babies? Severely Cognitively impaired people, non-human animals?

God is not all-powerful Harold Kushner When bad things happen to Good People Either God could prevent all this pain suffering, and chooses not to, or God cannot prevent it. If God chooses not to, God is not all-loving If God cannot, God is not all-powerful I cannot accept that God is not all-loving So, God must not be all powerful