© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemical Reactions. Which of the following indicated that the reaction was completed in the experiments? A. Solution A was added to Solution B. B. The.
Advertisements

Limiting Reactants Unit 7 1. Limiting Reactants 2.
Percentage Yield.
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
before and after rehabilitation
Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Figure 1. Diagram of calorimeter Kl-12 Mn: 1-bomb calorimeter; 2-calorimeter cover; 3-temperature sensor; 4-cover holder with mechanical mixer drive; 5-mechanichal.
(1 mmol), aniline (1 mmol) or indole (1 mmol) and kojic acid (1 mmol)
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Parameters of the transmission line
Table 1. Structural Form Parameter Estimates of inflation rate
No. of runs Xo X1 X2 X3 X4 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Si
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Figure 1. Cyclic voltammograms of carbon supported 10 % Pt catalysts prepared in 0.5 M H2SO4 + 1 M C2H5OH solution at 0.02 V/s scan rate at (a) rpm.
Tensile Test after Firing
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
الاحتراق.
Management Philosophy
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Iterative calculation procedure, M is standard at 25°C
Area Number of Roadmaps %
Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions
Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)
Total CO2 Emissions (Electricity + Fossil Fuel)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a
Interpass temperature
Table 2. Air-water flow cases
Table 3. Main properties of the thin brass electrode
Simulation Frequency(Hz)
Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b
Table 2. Regression statistics for direction a
Table 3. Regression statistics for direction b
Average Hardness value (HRC)
Table 6. The effect of porosity on pore velocity
Unstandardized Coefficient Standardized Coefficient
and Applications, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 2, doi: /jcsa-4-2-2
Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS
Table 1. Measurements of LEDs
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source of variation Degrees of freedom Sum of squares Mean square
Curve No Width of patch (W) Length of patch (L) RL Freq. Range
Table 5. Water quality A3 well during pumping test
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
No. of runs Xo X1 X2 X3 X4 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Si2
Solid-liquid ratio (B)
Figure 4. (a) Effect of pressure and time on yield of extract, (b) Effect of temperature and time on yield of extract, (c) Effect of temperature and pressure.
ADC(x 10-3 mm2 /s)±standard diviation
ADC(x 10-3 mm2 /s)±standard diviation
Table 4. Value creation (Y2)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
S. No. Product Name yield content
Flow rate of fuel (kmol/h) = 120
Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Average Execution Time in seconds
Power per unit land or water area
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Education, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, doi: /wjce-4-1-4
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 6. Optimized conditions for etherification reaction conditions obtained from DOE Parameters Value Reaction time (h) 8.29 Reaction temperature (°C) 250 Catalyst amount (wt. %) 2.51 Predicted Diglycerol yield (%) 44.7 Experimental 47.8 Error (%) Diglycerol yield 6.5 Zahra Gholami et al. Selective Etherification of Glycerol over Heterogeneous Mixed Oxide Catalyst: Optimization of Reaction Parameters. Chemical Engineering and Science, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 4, 79-86. doi:10.12691/ces-1-4-6 © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Science and Education Publishing.