Identifying risk factors: Challenges of separating signal from noise

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tomislav Mihaljevic, MD, Edward R
Advertisements

Max B. Mitchell, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters  Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,
Challenging homografts as the holy grail for aortic valve endocarditis
Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD 
Rounding numbers The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Advising complex patients who require complex heart operations
Endovascular versus open elephant trunk completion for extensive aortic disease  Eric E. Roselli, MD, Sreekumar Subramanian, MD, Zhiyuan Sun, BS, Jahanzaib.
The least of 3 evils: Exposure to red blood cell transfusion, anemia, or both?  Gabriel Loor, MD, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Liang Li, PhD, Joseph F.
Mitral Valve Surgery in the Adult Marfan Syndrome Patient
Replacement of the ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve disease: Where do we draw the line?  Thoralf M. Sundt, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Surgical treatment of pseudoaneurysm of the thoracic aorta
Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Effects of right ventricular morphology and function on outcomes of patients with degenerative mitral valve disease  Ying Ye, BS, Ravi Desai, MD, Lina.
Functional mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair is a true anatomic problem that originates from the time of surgery  Vincent Chan, MD, MPH, Thierry.
Multilevel data analysis: What? Why? How?
Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?
A. Marc Gillinov, MD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD, Edward R
Capturing echocardiographic allograft valve function over time after allograft aortic valve or root replacement  M. Mostafa Mokhles, PhD, MSc, Jeevanantham.
Risk-corrected impact of mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves on long-term mortality after aortic valve replacement  Ole Lund, MD, PhD, Martin Bland,
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
Gabriel Loor, MD, Liang Li, PhD, Joseph F
Outcomes of less invasive J-incision approach to aortic valve surgery
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
Nicholas G. Smedira, MD, Katherine J. Hoercher, RN, Dustin Y
Does the degree of preoperative mitral regurgitation predict survival or the need for mitral valve repair or replacement in patients with anomalous origin.
Distal aortic interventions after repair of ascending dissection: The argument for a more aggressive approach  Eric E. Roselli, MD, Gabriel Loor, MD,
Quality of mitral valve surgery at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs  Juan A. Crestanello, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients
Innovation and science: The future of valve design
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Michele Gallo, MD, Gino Gerosa, MD 
A first start for lung transplantation?
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement: Both excellent therapies  J. James Edelman, MBBS(Hons), PhD, Vinod H. Thourani,
Torsten Doenst, MD, PhD, Markus Richter, MD 
Bahaaldin Alsoufi, MD, Cedric Manlhiot, BSc, Brian W
Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005  Scott D. Barnett, PhD,
Kevin Bridge, MD, MSPH, Robert Saeid Farivar, MD, PhD 
Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD, Fernando A. Atik, MD, Delos M
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD 
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve
Internal validation of risk models in lung resection surgery: Bootstrap versus training- and-test sampling  Alessandro Brunelli, MD, Gaetano Rocco, MD 
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Biomaterials for heart valve replacement: Conjectures and refutations
Warfarin or aspirin after mitral valve repair: Why work harder?
Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD 
Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta is free—for some
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Pulmonary hypertension is associated with worse early and late outcomes after aortic valve replacement: Implications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement 
Severe tricuspid or mitral regurgitation in inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. Can we leave them alone?  Juan A. Crestanello, MD  The Journal of.
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
A. Marc Gillinov, MD, Jon Sirak, MD, Eugene H
Permanent pacemaker insertion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Not infrequent, not benign, and becoming predictable  Craig M. Jarrett,
The continuing challenge of congenital heart disease in China
Commentary: When a choice is not an echo
Between a rock and a hard place
Bicuspid aortopathy: Seeing the forest for the trees
Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement  Todd M. Dewey,
After neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, predicted pulmonary function may be reduced by 10%  Benny Weksler, MD, MBA  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Toward a more rational approach in treating type B aortic dissection
Evaluating the best approach to treatment of aortic stenosis: The jury is still out  Glen B. Taksler, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Fernando A. Atik, MD, Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD, FACC, Eugene H
Which biologic valve should we select for the 45- to 65-year-old age group requiring aortic valve replacement?  F. Dagenais, MD, P. Cartier, MD, P. Voisine,
Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: “Busted”
Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location”  Kevin L. Greason, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
Presentation transcript:

Identifying risk factors: Challenges of separating signal from noise Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 153, Issue 5, Pages 1136-1138 (May 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.01.010 Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Example of automated variable selection by bootstrap aggregation (bagging), depicting the advantage of averaging. Fifteen variables labeled A through O are depicted as potential predictors of death after mitral valve surgery. In A, analyses of 5 bootstrap samples are shown. Tall bars indicate the variable was selected at P < .05, and gaps represent variables not selected. B and C show running averages as the bootstrap samples increased from 1 to 1000. Notice that no variable was selected 100% of the time, and all 15 were selected at one time or another. From Blackstone and colleagues.4 The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017 153, 1136-1138DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.01.010) Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Random forest for survival partial dependency plot depicts the nonlinear relationship between albumin and 1-year predicted survival.10 Graph presents a risk-adjusted estimate of the effect of albumin on survival after aortic valve replacement. Circles and solid lines represent risk-adjusted estimates, and dashed lines indicate 68% confidence band. From Szeto and colleagues.11 The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017 153, 1136-1138DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.01.010) Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, and Eugene H. Blackstone, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2017 153, 1136-1138DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.01.010) Copyright © 2017 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions