DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model of DNA strand cleavage by topoisomerase I
Advertisements

Box H/ACA Small Ribonucleoproteins
Crystal Structure of a Flp Recombinase–Holliday Junction Complex
Recombination: Pieces of the site-specific recombination puzzle
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine
The Mu Three-Site Synapse
Eukaryotic transcription initiation
Unexpected Structural Diversity in DNA Recombination
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Addison V. Wright, James K. Nuñez, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell 
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
The Three Chemical Steps of Tn10/IS10 Transposition Involve Repeated Utilization of a Single Active Site  Silvia Bolland, Nancy Kleckner  Cell  Volume.
Bernard Hallet, Lidia K Arciszewska, David J Sherratt  Molecular Cell 
Hector Aldaz, Eugene Schuster, Tania A Baker  Cell 
Ubiquitin Recognition by the Human TSG101 Protein
Tn10 Transposition via a DNA Hairpin Intermediate
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Brigitte D Lavoie, Gary S Shaw, Anders Millner, George Chaconas  Cell 
Volume 164, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Mu Transpososome Architecture Ensures that Unfolding by ClpX or Proteolysis by ClpXP Remodels but Does Not Destroy the Complex  Briana M. Burton, Tania.
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Recognition of Chromosomal DNA by PNAs
A Shared Surface of TBP Directs RNA Polymerase II and III Transcription via Association with Different TFIIB Family Members  Xuemei Zhao, Laura Schramm,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Protein Turnover: A CHIP Programmed for Proteolysis
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
The Hin dimer interface is critical for Fis-mediated activation of the catalytic steps of site-specific DNA inversion  Michael J. Haykinson, Lianna M.
Architecture of a Serine Recombinase-DNA Regulatory Complex
Regulation of protein phosphatase-1
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Teaching a new dog old tricks?
Progressive Structural Transitions within Mu Transpositional Complexes
Melissa S Jurica, Raymond J Monnat, Barry L Stoddard  Molecular Cell 
Emerging Roles for Plant Topoisomerase VI
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Three-Site Synapsis during Mu DNA Transposition: A Critical Intermediate Preceding Engagement of the Active Site  Mark A Watson, George Chaconas  Cell 
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Box H/ACA Small Ribonucleoproteins
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Crystal Structure of Saccharopine Reductase from Magnaporthe grisea, an Enzyme of the α-Aminoadipate Pathway of Lysine Biosynthesis  Eva Johansson, James.
Structural Basis for Specificity in the Poxvirus Topoisomerase
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Springs and zippers: coiled coils in SNARE-mediated membrane fusion
Figure: Title: Transposons have inverted repeats and generate target repeats Caption: Transposons have inverted terminal repeats and generate direct.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Hui Yang, Dinshaw J. Patel  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Emerging Roles for Plant Topoisomerase VI
Angela K Kennedy, David B Haniford, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell 
Mike O'Donnell, David Jeruzalmi, John Kuriyan  Current Biology 
A Model for the γδ Resolvase Synaptic Complex
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
Thomas Gaj, Benjamin E Epstein, David V Schaffer  Molecular Therapy 
Xiaowu Gai, Daniel F. Voytas  Molecular Cell 
David G. Blake, Martin R. Boocock, David J. Sherratt, W.Marshall Stark 
The genetics of prions—a contradiction in terms?
Presentation transcript:

DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine George Chaconas, Brigitte D Lavoie, Mark A Watson  Current Biology  Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages 817-820 (July 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00603-6

Figure 1 Domain structure of the 663 amino-acid Mu A transposase protein. Domains I, II and III are depicted in red, blue and green, respectively, with sub-domains indicated. Numbers above the boxes refer to amino-acid positions at the beginning of each functional region. Asterisks denote positions of DDE motif residues (see [18]). The 26 amino-acid peptide from domain IIIα (residues 575–600) displays both non-specific DNA binding and nuclease activities [11]. Non-specific DNA binding activities have also been attributed to domain Iγ (residues 178–243) and domain II (residues 491–560), on the basis of partial proteolysis (see [1]) and crystallization [19] studies, respectively. Current Biology 1996 6, 817-820DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00603-6)

Figure 2 Protein–DNA complexes involved in Mu DNA transposition. The standard substrate for the in vitro reaction is a supercoiled mini-Mu plasmid containing the left and right ends of Mu along with the transpositional enhancer. The earliest characterized synaptic complex is the LER [5] in which the two Mu ends (L and R) and the enhancer (E) are brought together by a complex circuit of interactions involving the transposase Mu A and aided by the host HU and IHF proteins. The LER is converted to the Type 0 complex (or SSC, stable synaptic complex), in which the enhancer has been released and the two Mu ends are engaged within the active sites of the complex. DNA cleavage results in the formation of the Type 1 complex (or CDC, cleaved donor complex), in which a nick has been introduced at each end of the Mu DNA, exposing 3′ OH groups and resulting in relaxation of the vector domain. In the presence of Mu B, strand transfer of these 3′ ends into a random site on a target DNA molecule generates a Type 2 complex (or STC, strand transfer complex). Subsequently, the action of the ClpX chaperone induces a conformational change in the Type 2 transpososome and weakens the interactions which hold it together [16]. The product of this transformation is the Type 3 or STC2 transpososome, which then functions in the assembly of proteins required for DNA replication. For further details see [1,2]. Current Biology 1996 6, 817-820DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00603-6)

Figure 3 Model of the Mu transposase subunits that promote the strand-transfer reaction. This view is a close-up of the events at the end of the Mu DNA during formation of the Type 2 complex (see Figure 2). Different colors denote the four Mu A monomers in the core tetramer. Note the interlocking of domains from separate monomers to build an active site, and the participation of domain II in trans or across the synapse from where domain Iβ of the same monomer is bound. The two IIIα domains are from the R2-bound subunits. For simplicity, vector DNA is not shown. (Modified from [13], with permission). Current Biology 1996 6, 817-820DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00603-6)