JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simulation Study For MEIC Electron Cooling He Zhang, Yuhong Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Abstract Electron cooling of the ion beams.
Advertisements

Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
CESR as Light Source David L. Rubin for the CESR Operations Group Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
Beam energy calibration: systematic uncertainties M. Koratzinos FCC-ee (TLEP) Physics Workshop (TLEP8) 28 October 2014.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
March 2011Particle and Nuclear Physics,1 Experimental tools accelerators particle interactions with matter detectors.
Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H. Braun Miniworkshop on Machine and Physics Aspects of CLIC based future Collider Option, Ion Programme of LHC Hans-H.
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
ERHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring V.Ptitsyn, J.Kewisch, B.Parker, S.Peggs, D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA D.E.Berkaev, I.A.Koop, A.V.Otboev, Yu.M.Shatunov,
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Prospects for RHIC Low-Energy Operations Todd Satogata (W. Fischer, T. Roser, A. Fedotov, N. Tsoupas, M. Brennan, C. Montag, and others) “Can We Discover.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
FCC-hh: First simulations of electron cloud build-up L. Mether, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo FCC Design meeting.
1 RHIC II – Ion Operation Wolfram Fischer RHIC II Workshop, BNL – Working Group: Equation of State 27 April 2005.
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
Polarization of CEPC M. Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY Dec , 2013 International workshop on.
Choice of circumference, minimum & maximum energy, number of collision points, and target luminosity M. Koratzinos ICFA HF2014, Thursday, 9/10/2014.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
MAC meeting (12-13 January 2010) Machine Advisory Committee participants: B.Sharkov (ITEP/FAIR) P.Belochitskii (CERN) S.Ivanov (IHEP, Protvino) M.Steck.
A RHIC Low-Energy Test Run With Protons Todd Satogata (W. Fischer, T. Roser, J. DeLong, M. Brennan, D. Bruno, and others) April 11, 2006 Driven by discussions.
EC plans in connection with eRHIC Wolfram Fischer ILCDR08 – Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 10 July 2008.
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Global Beam Energy Scan Global Beam Energy Scan
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
LHC Radio Frequency Swing
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Progress of SPPC lattice design
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
PHY862 Accelerator Systems Introduction to Accelerators Homework
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
A Design Study of a Compressor ring for
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Injection design of CEPC
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Beam Beam effects for JLEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
DODGE: Direct Observations in DESIREE of Gear-changing Events
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Conventional Synchronization Schemes
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
Updates on the beam-beam effect in JLEIC
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Beam Synchronization in MEIC: The Problem, Scale and Prospect
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Illustrations of Beam Synchronization Issue
Presentation transcript:

JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders Edward Nissen JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting 11/2/2017

Gear changing via Path Length Change (e+e-) DaΦne Super KEK-B BEPC-II Outline Gear changing via Path Length Change (e+e-) DaΦne Super KEK-B BEPC-II Gear Changing via Inertia (ions) NICA (future) DESIREE RHIC Discussion Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 2

It is invasive, and would require a fair amount of engineering. Gear Changing via path length My assumption is that we would add a chicane to equal the bunch spacing in one of the rings, allowing for gear changing It is invasive, and would require a fair amount of engineering. Could only be done during long shutdowns Well understood If systematic error considerations are as important to the e+e- field as they are to the nuclear field they might be interested in developing the technology. Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 3

DAΦNE (Double Annular Φ factory for Nice Experiments) Located at INFN Frascati 2 ~ 500 MeV beams, one e+ one e- Up to 120 bunches in each ring at the same time H+1 would require a pathlength change of ~ 80cm Dense Lattice Synchrotron radiation dominates the dynamics The impedance budget might be blown with the addition of a chicane. Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 4

O(2500) bunches per ring with 7 on 4 GeV e+ e- collisions. SUPERKEKB At KEK in Tsukuba Japan. O(2500) bunches per ring with 7 on 4 GeV e+ e- collisions. H+1 pathlength change would be ~1.2 meters Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 5

Located in Beijing at IHEP Approximately 93 bunches per ring BEPC-II (Beijing Electron Positron Collider II) Located in Beijing at IHEP Approximately 93 bunches per ring Between 2 and 4.2 GeV center of mass e+ e- collisions Path length difference of ~2.4 meters Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 6

Gear Changing via Inertia Use different ion energies and species to create a velocity difference between two rings in a collider. The lower energy will be the deciding factor in determining this “throw” between the two beams. The lower energy can’t be more than 11 GeV/u or so (really 10.5) unless the machine is huge. Hence the LHC is out. Since this would require little to no change in the machine it should be as simple as running some simulations and getting some beam time. Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 7

Being built at JINR in Dubna Collides ions at 1-4.5 GeV/u NICA (Nuclotron based Ion Collider fAcility) Being built at JINR in Dubna Collides ions at 1-4.5 GeV/u This energy difference allows a “throw” of 50.7 meters in a 454 meter collider ring with 22 bunches per ring. Could actually test n on m instead of n(n-1) Schedule currently unclear. Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 8

DESIREE (Double ElectroStatic Ion Ring ExpEriment) Stockholm University facility Ion beams from +/- 25 KeV to 100 KeV in either ring. Bunch populations very low. Would require using the different velocities to create collisions with a moving reference frame Bunch populations are very low. O(106) Interactions too weak for direct beam-beam experiments, but control and synchronization should be testable. Low energy allows a lot of things not normally doable. Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 9

RHIC (Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider) Brookhaven National Laboratory New York RHIC is designed for asymmetric collisions, but the IR magnets are shared, so the rigidities must remain matched Using the baseline numbers for RHIC a 28.4 GeV proton beam on a 10.8 GeV Gold beam would give a throw of 10.3 m which corresponds to 1 RF bucket. Since RHIC only fills every third bucket a 15.5 GeV proton on 5.7 GeV Au scheme would be needed for gear changing. Both are higher than the lowest achieved operation. Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 10

Where N1 is the larger number RHIC Experiment Using data to the right, we can estimate the beam-beam tune shifts as follows for a hypothetical p on Au experiment: Protons: ξ=.000404 Gold: ξ=0.000077 According to the Hao et al. paper the stability criterion is that: ξ<(1/(4*N1)) Where N1 is the larger number Assuming N1=120, the stability limit is 0.0021 Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 11

RHIC is the most promising machine. Discussion RHIC is the most promising machine. Need to determine exact experiments. DESIREE should be considered due to ease of use and low cost. Low energy can allow a lot of things that are normally too difficult. The e+e- colliders should still be considered if the systematics case is strong enough and there is interest in investigating the procedure. Possibilities for Gear-Changing Experiments in Current and Future Colliders 12

Thank You

Backup