Electrostatic activation of Escherichia coli methionine repressor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
The open conformation of a Pseudomonas lipase
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Mechanism and Substrate Recognition of Human Holo ACP Synthase
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (July 1996)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
The crystal structure of bovine bile salt activated lipase: insights into the bile salt activation mechanism  Xiaoqiang Wang, Chi-sun Wang, Jordan Tang,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Prolyl Oligopeptidase
Crystal Structures of a Novel Ferric Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Its Complex with NADP+  Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Eric.
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Crystal structure of the ternary complex of 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene reductase from Magnaporthe grisea with NADPH and an active-site inhibitor  Arnold.
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
The structure of the C-terminal domain of methionine synthase: presenting S- adenosylmethionine for reductive methylation of B12  Melinda M Dixon, Sha.
Elena Conti, Nick P Franks, Peter Brick  Structure 
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Tzanko Doukov, Javier Seravalli, John J Stezowski, Stephen W Ragsdale 
Alec E. Hodel, Paul D. Gershon, Florante A. Quiocho  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 1-4 (January 1994)
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages (September 1997)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Crystal Structure of a Smad MH1 Domain Bound to DNA
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Yong Xiong, Fang Li, Jimin Wang, Alan M. Weiner, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Restriction Enzyme BsoBI–DNA Complex
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Electrostatic activation of Escherichia coli methionine repressor Kathryn Phillips, Simon EV Phillips  Structure  Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages 309-316 (April 1994) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00032-0

Figure 1 Overall fold of the holorepressor backbone, with the molecular dyad vertical. One subunit is shown in red with regions of secondary structure labelled, and the other in pink. The SAM molecules are shown as ball-and-stick models (green) with the sulphur atoms yellow, and bind to two symmetry- related sites at the bottom. Drawn with program MOLSCRIPT [16]. Structure 1994 2, 309-316DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00032-0)

Figure 2 Sequence and numbering scheme for the operator oligonucleotide in the crystal structure of the complex. The two strands are related by a central crystallographic two-fold axis. The boxed regions correspond to consensus met boxes. Structure 1994 2, 309-316DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00032-0)

Figure 3 Stereo view of repressor–operator complex. Two repressors (in red) are bound to the DNA at upper left and lower right respectively, and related by a crystallographic two-fold axis passing through the centre of the complex perpendicular to the plane of the paper. The SAM molecules (green) lie on the outer surface of the complex, distant from the DNA. The DNA is shown in a surface representation, coloured such that all atoms lying within the +1kT e −1 potential contour due to SAM partial charges are blue, while all atoms with a potential < +1kT e −1 are white. Structure 1994 2, 309-316DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00032-0)

Figure 4 Chemical structures of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), adenosylornithine (AO) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH). The partial charges used in the calculation of the corepressor and corepressor analogue interactions with the operator DNA are shown in full for SAM. For AO and SAH, atom names are shown only where they differ from SAM. The charge sets were derived from the AMBER charges for methionine and adenosine. Structure 1994 2, 309-316DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00032-0)

Figure 5 Contours of electrostatic potential of the holorepressor displayed as a slice through the molecule in the same orientation as Figure 1. The +1kT e−1 contour is blue, and the −1kT e−1 contour red. The repressor is green. A region of positive potential extends into the solvent from the β -ribbon DNA-binding face at the top of the molecule. The potential map for aporepressor (not shown) is superficially very similar. Structure 1994 2, 309-316DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00032-0)

Figure 6 Map of the potential generated by SAM molecules when buried in the low dielectric cavity of the repressor–operator complex found in the crystal structure in the same orientation as Figure 3. The +1kT e−1 (blue) potential crosses the interface between the two repressor dimers, and extends through the complex to lie over an extended region of the phosphate backbone. The −1kT e−1 contour is shown in red, DNA in white. Structure 1994 2, 309-316DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00032-0)

Figure 7 Comparison of the +1kT e−1 potential contours due to SAM (pink), SAH (blue) and AO (red) at phosphate P10 (3′ to A9) of the operator (white). The SAM contour extends furthest over the operator backbone, resulting in the most favourable interaction. Structure 1994 2, 309-316DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00032-0)