Data Enhancement Project - Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Code Governance Review: WWU views on potential changes to UNC and the Modification Panel Simon Trivella – 30 th March 2010 Governance Workstream.
Advertisements

Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Operating Margins. 2 Competitive Provision of Operating Margins Change to National Grid Gas’s Transporter Licence which:  Introduced Special Condition.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
MIPI / RG140 Update Chris Shanley. Agenda  Review Group Background  MIPI Project - Background  RG140 Principles to be delivered via MIPI  Functionality.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
Changes to the Network Emergency Co-ordinator (NEC) Safety Case resulting from Exit Reform UNC Workgroup 0412 Meeting – 1 st March 2012.
Mod 0333: Update of default System Marginal Prices Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 07/10/2010.
XVI th Madrid Forum Madrid, 28 May 2009 Walter Boltz (Gas Working Group Chair) Transparency guidelines and GRI transparency work.
Gas Emergency Arrangements Proposal Transmission Workstream 5 th April 2007.
Proposer: Hayley Burden Panel Date: 17th April : Mod Title: Imbalance Charge amendments required to align the UNC with the Network Code on Gas.
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision Transmission Workstream meeting, 3 rd December 2009.
Code Administrators Working Group (CAWG) Meeting 3, 29th October 2008.
Pamela Taylor, Head of European Strategy, Ofgem Madrid Forum, March 2011 ERGEG’s draft framework guideline for gas balancing.
MIPI European Transparency Project (ETP) Transmission Workstream 7 th October 2010.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Gas Roads & GTE Colin Hamilton (European Policy) 2 nd July 2009.
Madrid Forum 6-7 November 2008 Implementating the 3rd Energy Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper Lord Mogg, ERGEG chairman.
Click to edit Master title style 1 Neta Meidav Manager, Ofgem GRI NW 9 th Stakeholder Group Meeting 25 November 2011, Rotterdam GRI NW Transparency Project.
Industry Dialogue on xoserve Services 14 th September 2007.
Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
Gas Transmission Charging Review: Final Capacity Charging Proposal Gas TCMF 14 th December 2006.
DSC Change Committee UK Link Future Releases Proposed Approach
EU Phase 3 Customer communications
Congestion Management
Transmission Workstream 6 January 2011
The 3rd package for the internal energy market
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
EU Implementation Programme
Review of System Alerts
Manifest Errors for Entry Capacity Overruns Workgroup 364
Review of UNC Section Q “Emergencies”
Grid Code Development Forum – 6 September 2017
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15th May 2012.
SO Incentives from April 2010
CAP190: Workgroup Report CUSC Modifications Panel, 26th August 2011
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
Update on Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Background MDD is currently managed within SPAA
Enhanced information provision and revision of the Gas Balancing Alert for Winter 2009 July 2009.
Joint Office Presentation for Modification 0678
Transmission Workgroup 6th March 2014
Transmission Planning Code Review
Introduction of Code Contingency Guidelines Document
Proposed Changes to UNC Section O
Transmission Workstream 2nd December 2010
Richard Fairholme Transmission Workstream 4th September 2008
Options for the Development of a Demand Side Response Mechanism
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
EU Codes: Implementation Issues
Ofgem presentation to Gas Transmission Workstream
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
Gemini Code Contingency Review
Joint Office UNC Elections
Joint Office UNC Elections
Gas Customer Forum 28 July 2008
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
Joint Office UNC Elections
Capacity Access Review
Presentation transcript:

Data Enhancement Project - Update Transmission Working Group 05/09/2019

Context: Energy Data Taskforce Recommendations The Energy Data Taskforce, commissioned by Government, Ofgem, and Innovate UK, has set out five key recommendations that will modernise the UK energy system and drive it towards a Net Zero carbon future within their report: A Strategy for a Modern Digitalised Energy System: Digitalisation of the Energy System Maximising the Value of Data Visibility of Data Coordination of Asset Visibility of Infrastructure and Assets Martin Cave, Ofgem chairman, said: “Data will play a crucial role in enabling competition and innovation to drive down prices for customers and provide them with new products and services. “This is why Ofgem fully supports the Taskforce’s five recommendations to improve data use. We will be working with BEIS, consumer groups and the industry to ensure better use of data unlocks a brighter future for energy consumers.” There is an increasing need for more visible and relevant data for all industry participants to be able to utilise. An agile process will facilitate he access to this data. | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Background Real Time Supply Data Real Time Demand Data Modification 0006 - 3rd Party Proposal : Publication of Near Real Time Data at UK sub-terminals was implemented in October 2006. The modification was raised to mandate Transco to publish the data as Transco had been reluctant to do so without discussion for the legal, commercial and technical issues. This obligated near Real Time Supply Data to be published in line with TPD – V Annex V-1 Any amendments to this data would need to be via a Uniform Network Code (UNC) modification Real Time Demand Data Following customer feedback and to provide additional information to the industry National Grid has been publishing Real Time Demand Data This is currently not governed Both Real Time Supply Data and Real Time Demand Data are published on the National Grid Website in the same place | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Governance of Real Time Data With the improvements to the provision of data being offered by NTS we have come up with the following options to govern the Real Time Supply Data (Supply Data) and the Real Time Demand Data (Demand Data) Option Pros Cons Add Demand Data to UNC via a modification Both Supply Data and Demand Data will be governed the same Resource and time of a modification which may require development at workgroup Any subsequent changes require a modification Supply Data to be removed from UNC and governed with Demand Data via the Data Dictionary route Both governed in the same place Data dictionary to be a single repository of data provisioning, governed by the Uniform Network Code Operations Reporting Manual via UNCC* Quicker to change than the UNC process Resource and time of a modification (anticipated self-governance, straight to Code Administrator Consultation) Continue to provide Supply Data in line with UNC requirements. Add Demand Data to the Data Dictionary Adding in Demand Data to the Data Dictionary is via UNCC approval; no modification required No changes to UNC Governance of real time data in different places No governance process for Demand Data No change required No governance of Demand Data * Uniform Network Code Committee | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Clarification on the change being proposed The change is: Proposing to introduce a consistent way to govern data; with both Real Time Supply Data and Real Time Demand Data governed alongside all other Data within the UNC Data Dictionary To agree a robust governance process that provides comfort for future changes; whilst being more agile than introducing UNC modifications for any change Not changing any data currently published Not changing the platform that data is currently published on | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Transmission Workgroup Discussion 01/08 National Grid’s preferred option is for Real Time Supply Data to be removed rom UNC and governed via the UNC Data Dictionary and the UNC Operations Reporting Manual because: There is a process for engagement with the industry. No data will be added or removed without industry consultation The UNC Data Dictionary and Operations Reporting manual governs most of the data provided by National Grid. EU mandated data will be excluded from this process There is already a robust process in UNC to govern the data via the Operations Reporting Manual and Data Dictionary The process to update is a quicker process and more agile than UNC modification development which aligns to Energy Code review aspirations At Transmission workgroup in August the general feedback was for Real Time Demand Data to be added to UNC via a modification | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Transmission Workgroup Concerns - REMIT REMIT: (REGULATION (EU) No 1227/2011 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL, of 25 October 2011 on wholesale energy market integrity and transparency) obligations include: Provisions that require publication of data under Article 4. Provisions related to the inside information. The publication of data and data availability (i.e. data may need to be available to all market participants at the same time). Transmission Workgroup do not want any risks with regards to data required to be published under REMIT, nor any disclosure of information that has an adverse impact REMIT obligations are deemed superior to UNC obligations. All EU mandated data will be treated separately and is not being proposed to be included within the UNC Data Dictionary or UNC. A process for objection to new data items proposed has been included within the process. The process under Inside information “means information of a precise nature which has not been made public, which relates, directly or indirectly, to one or more wholesale energy products and which, if it were made public, would be likely to significantly affect the prices of those wholesale energy products”. In addition, Information shall be deemed to be of a precise nature if it indicates a set of circumstances which exists or may reasonably be expected to come into existence, or an event which has occurred or may reasonably be expected to do so, and if it is specific enough to enable a conclusion to be drawn as to the possible effect of that set of circumstances or event on the prices of wholesale energy products. | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Current Governance of Data Data subject to Governance via the UNC Operations Reporting Manual and UNC Data Dictionary Data subject to Governance via the UNC modification process Balancing LNG Real Time Supply Data Capacity Auction Storage Capacity entry Prices Capacity Exit Shrinkage CV Supply Demand Throughput Gas Trading Weather Interruption Transitional Items Linepack Real Time Demand Data is currently not subject to any formal governance arrangements | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Gas Operational Data Community The Data Community website was created to help facilitate collaboration across the gas industry, providing further transparency of gas operational data. Its aim is to maximise the transparency of data and decisions, to enable efficiencies within business decisions. This enables NG to communicate to the market in an efficient manner on residual balancing decisions, to provide better visualisation, to test concepts and gain feedback. The website is available to all to register, engage in discussion forums, vote and read up on all updates. There are currently over 110 organisations signed up and over 250 participants Feedback to date is that the industry want an agile process to implement new data requirements efficiently – with limited cost and time | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Additional MIPI Data Process Update data Dictionary Update UNC operational Reporting Manual Implement in MIPI Yes UNC modification process TPD V9.4.5 Process New Data Request (from industry or NG proposal) Issue of Confidentiality Yes Reject Request Majority vote Support for data items and no concerns raised; including no flags re REMIT data Define data request Publish trial data Yes Seek approval from Uniform Network Code committee (UNCC) Data Community Website Discussion at Gas Ops forum & Transmission WG | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

UNC TPD - Section V 9.4.5 If National Grid NTS proposes to revise the Uniform Network Code Operations Reporting Manual, it shall obtain prior approval by Panel Majority of the Uniform Network Code Committee, and if such revision materially increases the extent of the information relating to Users to be published pursuant thereto: National Grid NTS will notify Users of its proposal not less than one month before implementing such proposal; any User may, within 14 Days after National Grid NTS's notification under paragraph (a), notify National Grid NTS that the User objects to such revision, providing reasonable details of the grounds for the User's objection; if a User so notifies an objection to National Grid NTS, National Grid NTS will not implement the revision unless the Authority shall (upon National Grid NTS's application) give Condition A11(18) Approval to its doing so. | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Update data Dictionary Update UNC operational Reporting Manual TPD V9.4.5 Process Update data Dictionary Update UNC operational Reporting Manual Implement in MIPI Ofgem Condition A11 (18) approval Yes (within 14 days) UNC modification process Yes Publication of proposal on the Data Community website Email issued from Joint Office to all Reject Request New Data Request Majority vote Objection UNNC determine materially increases the extent of the information relating to Users including REMIT impact concerns 1 month Intention with the email is provide the same visibility as the UNC modification process Seek approval from UNCC Support for data items and no concerns raised Yes Define data request Publish trial data Data Community Website Discussion at Gas Ops forum & Transmission WG | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

What is captured in the UNC Data Dictionary | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

What is captured in the UNC TPD-V | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Data Governance through UNC Data Dictionary Engagement It is proposed to engage as wide as possible via: The data community website which currently has over 250 participants The Gas Ops forum Transmission Workgroup Distribution Workgroup (where a change would impact on LDZ data) Change Management Committee (where a change would impact on UK Link or Gemini data) The Data Community Website Allows National Grid to: Obtain feedback from a wide group of stakeholders including smaller market participants who may lack resources to attend Regulatory meetings. Allows Grid to obtain a body of evidence (level of interest/benefit to the market) for proposed new data to justify the cost of data provision. Provides Grid with the ability to trial data proposals and develop the maturity of the final proposal prior to seeking regulatory approval. UNC Data Dictionary process Benefits for the process It is a robust process in place with lots of engagement and the opportunity to veto a change at various stages or to defer to a UNC modification Could see a change within a few months instead of a lengthy UNC modification development process. A uniform process will be introduced for all data changes rather than the mix and match or regulated/non-regulated data in the current regime Same discussion forums as UNC modification proposals | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Energy Codes Review At Transmission Workgroup in August one member expressed concerns in case UNCC was no longer operational following the outcome of the Energy Codes Review. If this is the case all the provisions for approval via UNCC will need to be catered for e.g. the AUGE is governed through UNCC therefore we believe this will be considered within the review. We feel that moving all the data into the governance framework of the UNCC aligns to the Energy Codes review for the following reasons: One of the outcomes of the Energy Code Review is to make the energy code framework agile and responsive to change that benefits energy consumers – the UNC modification process is lengthier and more resource intensive than approval via UNCC One of the four areas of code reform is for Code simplification and consolidation - adding data items into UNC is making the Code more granular and complex | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019

Discussion and questions? | Data Enhancement Project - Update | 05/09/2019