Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures: Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling up Barbara J. Smith, U. of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center Policy.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Changing Practices, Changing Outcomes: Building State Capacity September, 2013.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
A Guide to the Implementation Process Stages, Steps and Activities July 29, pm EDT ECTA Implementation Process Team.
+ Evidence Based Practice University of Utah Training School Psychologists to be Experts in Evidence Based Practices for Tertiary Students with Serious.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BUREAU OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION Laboratory School and Model Early Childhood Learning Grant
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Tom Corbett, Governor Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Ed.D., Acting Secretary.
COLORADO SPECIALQUEST BIRTH-FIVE INITIATIVE Colorado Head Start Association Conference February 2009.
The Right Stuff: Resources to Support the Full Participation of Each Young Child Camille Catlett.
TOGETHER WE’RE BETTER Collaborative Approaches to Including Children With and Without Disabilities Camille Catlett & Jennie CoutureNovember 9, 2012.
Barbara J. Smith, Ph.D. University of Colorado Denver OSEP, July, 2014 Promoting Social Emotional Competence in All Young Children Through Collaboration.
1 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) Program Overview and Update May 2008.
1 Collaborative Financing to Promote Preschool Inclusion Creating Connections to Shining Stars Virginia Beach, 2013 Shelley deFosset Katy McCullough Andrea.
Implementation of Interventions to Promote Young Children’s Social and Behavioral Outcomes.
Supports for the Inclusion of Children of Diverse Abilities in Early Childhood Settings Camille Catlett Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs that Promote the Social and Emotional Development of Young Children Part II Roxane Kaufmann, Karen Blase,
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
The CSEFEL and State Implementation Partnerships An Overview.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
CSEFEL State Planning Rob Corso. CSEFEL  National Center focused on promoting the social emotional development and school readiness of young children.
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Building an Intentionally Inclusive Community Program: The Interactive Use of Selected TA Process Tools and Resources 2015 National Early Childhood Inclusion.
Vermont Agency of Education 4 December 2015
Building Systems of Support in Early Childhood Education 2016 OSEP VIRTUAL LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 2, 2016.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
1. 2  Curriculum Toolkit Curriculum Toolkit 3 Fred Rogers Center ELE 4.
PYRAMID PLUS APPROACH: THE “WHAT’S NEW REPORT”FOR EARLY INTERVENTION COLORADO Webinar: March 3 rd, :00-1:00 pm.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
CT’s DCF-Head Start Partnership Working Together to Serve Vulnerable Families & Support the Development of At-Risk Children Presenters: Rudy Brooks Former.
NC State Improvement Project
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
Camille Catlett and Megan Vinh
Thanks for coming. Introduce 21st Century and team.
Using Regional Groups to Effect Positive Change in HIV Care
Developing a System to Build Quality
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
OSEP Project Directors Meeting
Camille Catlett and Megan Vinh
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Presenter: Micky Beauregard
G-CASE Fall Conference November 14, 2013 Savannah, Ga
Ensuring a Great Start for All Young Children & Their Families
Bureau of Family Health: Infant Toddler Services
Early Childhood and Family Outcomes
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
SMART & CARING GRANT APPLICATION WORKSHOP
Overview of the Kansas Technical Assistance System Network: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Kerry.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Using Child and Program Standards to Improve Child Outcomes
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Using Evidence-Based Discipline Practices in Preschool Programs
Moving the Needle: Cross-Sector Indicators of High Quality Inclusion
Recommended Practices for Engaging Families September 11, 2019
Preschool LRE: Current State Challenges and Solutions
Presentation transcript:

Implementing, Sustaining and Scaling-Up High Quality Inclusive Preschool Policies and Practices: Application for Intensive TA September 10, 2019 Lise Fox, University of South Florida Barbara J. Smith, University of Denver

Agenda Overview of the purpose of the TA Description of the TA model and activities Discussion of the responsibilities of the state, LEAs and ECTA staff Description of selection and notification timeline Ask Your Questions at Any Point!

Intensive TA Goal Enhance state capacity to implement, sustain, and scale- up high quality inclusive preschool policies and practices for children ages 3 to 5 years participating in early childhood programs and receiving Part B services. Selected states (2) will receive on-site and distance technical assistance and training to result in the sustainable implementation of the ECTA and NCPMI Indicators of High Quality Inclusion at the state, LEA, and demonstration site levels.

RFA posted on ECTA website; online submission IMPLEMENTING, SUSTAINING AND SCALING-UP HIGH QUALITY INCLUSIVE PRESCHOOL POLICIES AND PRACTICES   RFA posted on ECTA website; online submission Applications due October 15, 2019 Submitted by Part B 619 Coordinator and state Special Education Director TA Provided from November, 2019-June, 2022

High Quality Inclusion: What is It? Early childhood inclusion embodies the values, policies, and practices that support the right of every infant and young child and his or her family, regardless of ability, to participate in a broad range of activities and contexts as full members of families, communities, and society. The desired results of inclusive experiences for children with and without disabilities and their families include a sense of belonging and membership, positive social relationships and friendships, and development and learning to reach their full potential. The defining features of inclusion that can be used to identify high quality early childhood programs and services are access, participation, and supports. DEC/NAEYC 2009

High Quality Inclusion: How do We Get There? “values, policies, and practices” “access, participation, and supports” Changing minds, beliefs, attitudes and values: increase understanding of the importance of high quality preschool inclusion Changing state and program policies: implementing funding, personnel and other policies that promote high quality preschool inclusion Changing practice: implementing high quality inclusion practices within ECE environments

Using the ECTA & NCPMI High Quality Indicator Tools A national initiative with partners across early care and education to develop indicators of high quality inclusive policies and practices at the state local program and early care and education environments levels The three sets of indicators will be used to define and measure progress

https://ectacenter.org/topics/inclusion/indicators.asp

https://ectacenter.org/topics/inclusion/indicators.asp

https://ectacenter.org/topics/inclusion/indicators.asp

Terms We Use and What They Mean State Leadership Team: an interagency, collaborative team (this may be an already existing group) to develop or strengthen policies, procedures, funding and other system infrastructure components. The State Leadership Team will use the State Indicators of High Quality Inclusion to guide planning and measure progress. This team of about 15 people agrees to meet monthly and make decisions collaboratively to build the state capacity to implement, sustain and scale-up high quality inclusion. Professional Development Network of Program Coaches: provide training and coaching to local education agency (LEA) inclusion leadership teams leading to high fidelity implementation of high-quality inclusion practices. The Local Program and the ECE Environment Indicators of High Quality Inclusion will be used to guide planning and to measure progress. Additional resources will be used including the Preschool Inclusion Toolbox (Barton & Smith, 2015) and the First Steps to Preschool Inclusion (Gupta, Henninger & Vinh, 2014). Practitioner Coaches: provide onsite coaching to practitioners in high quality inclusive practices as measured by the ECE Environment Indicators of High Quality Inclusion.

Terms We Use and What They Mean Implementation sites: the LEA Inclusion Leadership Team establishes a minimum of 2 sites to use the ECE Environment Indicators of High Quality Inclusion to implement the critical teaching practices and environments needed to maximize the access, meaningful participation, and developmental outcomes of young children with disabilities in early care and education environments and to serve as demonstration sites for the community and the state. LEA-based preschool inclusion leadership teams: An Inclusion Leadership Team is a team comprised of LEA administrators, community program administrators, program staff, family members, and others as appropriate. The team implements action plans, using the Local Program Indicators of High Quality Inclusion, to guide and support the availability of high-quality inclusive early care and education environments and serves as a model for others in the state. Annual Inclusion Implementation Academy: is convened by the state to bring together the State Leadership Team members, all Program Coaches, LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams as well as their implementation sites, and new LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams for scale-up. The logistics of the first Academy will be carried out by SLT and the ECTA staff.

Intensive TA to be provided by ECTA across two and 1/2 years ECTA will provide technical assistance in two phases over a period of two and ½ years. Phase I involves relationship building and understanding ongoing state context and current inclusion initiatives. Activities include several on- site training and TA visits to the state leadership team, program coaches and LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams along with a regular schedule of distance/virtual TA. Phase II involves fewer on-site visits and more distance/virtual TA with a focus on state independence, sustainability and scale up.

State Leadership Team: Activities and TA State Leadership Team (SLT) selected and monthly meeting schedule established. ECTA staff will meet face to face with the SLT the first meeting to provide orientation to the initiative within the context of the state and to provide recommendations for effective meeting strategies and tools SLT coordinator and ECTA staff communicate regularly to plan monthly meetings, discuss progress, share information. SLT meets monthly using the State Indicators of High Quality Inclusion to guide planning and measure progress (selecting and guiding LEA Inclusion Teams, Program Coaches, data collection and analysis) ECTA staff meet several times with the SLT in the first year; fewer visits the second year The SLT convenes an Annual Inclusion Implementation Academy to bring together the SLT members, all Program Coaches, implementing LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams as well as their demonstration sites, and new LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams for scale-up The logistics of the first Academy will be carried out by the SLT and the ECTA staff

Program Coaches: Activities and TA ECTA staff will provide ongoing distance support to Program Coaches and Practitioner Coaches as they work toward establishing high quality inclusive programs and practices. ECTA staff will support Program Coaches to: Support LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams to implement high quality inclusive policies and practices as measured by the Local Program and ECE Environment Indicators of High Quality Inclusion Guide Practitioner Coaches at implementation sites as they strive for implementation of the ECE Environment Indicators of High Quality Inclusion Assist LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams in collecting relevant data to make decisions across sites Collaborate with the SLT to expand LEAs and implementation sites and maintain quality across years

LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams: Activities and TA LEAs establish (or confirm) their Inclusion Leadership Team that meets monthly Program Coaches support meetings, data collection and data-based decision making and the implementation of inclusive policies and practices as measured by Local Program and ECE Environment Indicators of High Quality Inclusion with ECTA distance support LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams select 2-3 sites to serve as high fidelity demonstrations with Program Coach support LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams provide Practitioner Coaches to assist site practitioners in reaching high fidelity as measured by the ECE Environment Indicators of High Quality Inclusion Program Coaches support Practitioner Coaches as needed with ECTA distance support LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams provide data on quality indicator improvement Program Coaches assist LEA and state leadership teams to make data-based decisions with ECTA distance support

Our Implementation and Scale-up Approach: Statewide Implementation Guide A process for implementing evidence- based practices statewide Includes tools, materials, and examples http://ectacenter.org/sig/

Major Components of the Guide 4 Essential Support Structures State Leadership Team Professional Development Network of Program Coaches Demonstration and Implementation Sites Data Evaluation Systems Implementation Science: stages of implementation Exploration and Planning Installation Implementation: Initial to Full Scale-up Resources, templates and examples

Intended Outcomes The State Leadership Team (SLT) will make sustained progress on the State Indicators of High Quality Inclusion The SLT will have established a cadre of Program Coaches The SLT will have increased the number of Program Coaches to scale-up   The LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams will make sustained progress on the Local Program Indicators of High Quality Inclusion The demonstration sites will make sustained progress on the ECE Environment Indicators of High Quality Inclusion SLT will have selected at least 2 more LEA teams and their programs for scale up The SLT and LEA Inclusion Leadership Teams will be collecting and using data to make decisions about progress, and the quality and effectiveness of the inclusive opportunities The SLT and LEA teams will have written sustainability and scale-up plans and budgets The SLT will have hosted 2 annual Inclusion Implementation Academies and planning a 3rd

Application Requirements Submitted by Part B 619 Coordinator and state Special Education Director Description of cross-agency State Leadership Team (letters of commitment) Ability to allocate $20,000 per year to support your implementation activities Committed FTE to implementation (1.0; can be two people) Commitment of 2-3 LEAs to serve as initial implementation sites In it for the long haul! Commitment to implementation is evident in the narrative.

Selection and Award Applications due: October 15, 2019 States notified on or about: November 10, 2019 OSEP must approve before we accept a state We will not select more than 2 states Once selected, we will schedule a planning call on or about: November 15, 2019

Frequently Asked Questions What are our considerations for LEA selection? Should we select LEAs that have struggled with providing FAPE and LRE? Will you do training on preschool inclusion practices? We have a statewide system for training in inclusive practices and provide technical assistance to LEAs when requested. Are we eligible to apply? Who should be selected as a program coach? Are they staff already within the LEA? Our state wants to do a birth to five implementation in all settings and IDEA services. Can you help us with that? We have a state team already, but it is not cross-sector. Should we form a new one?

Any Other Questions? Thank you!