Returns to Prison for Violent (and Non-Violent) Offenders

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Advertisements

Oklahoma Department of Corrections DUI Offender Profile
Thinking Critically Questions Chapter Ten and Eleven.
Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.
1 17-Year-Old Offenders in the Adult Criminal Justice System Legislative Audit Bureau April 2008.
California Static Risk Assessment (CSRA)
Crime and Punishment Lesson 7-5. Measurement of Crime Crime- acts in violation of the law.
Created and Presented by Richard Harris, CBTP. “Released offenders are among the most difficult labor force populations to serve and least likely to be.
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
Reported Property Crime and Arrests Reported Property Crime 152, ,677159,814156,833147,684142,384138,899139,438.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
JFA Associates/The Institute, Washington, DC/Austin, Texas Risk Assessment Facts, Myths and Trends James Austin, Ph.D
Crime Chapter 13 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Break-Out Session Probation Part II. Evidence-Based Electronic Monitoring of Sex Offenders: Technology, Evidence, and Implications for Community Supervision.
Making Communities Safer Population Management/Control Strategies ASCA All Directors Training Session 2 December 3, 2010 CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS COMMISSIONER.
Punitiveness in the Imprisonment of Women, Natasha A. Frost Northeastern University.
Criminal Justice System. Police Have immediate control over who is arrested “Police discretion” Size of U.S. population and number of police officers.
American Community Survey Maryland State Data Center Affiliate Meeting September 16, 2010.
Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
ASCA Performance Based Measures System Training Performance Standards, Measures, and Key Indicators ASCA 1.
Presentation of Sentence Credits for Persons Convicted of Certain B Felonies Materials to Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice (NRS )
Sentencing and Corrections. Once Found Guilty, a defendant will be sentenced by a jury or judge.
A Natural Experiment on Residential Change and Recidivism: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina David S. Kirk Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Austin.
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.
Racial Disparities in Criminal Justice in Wisconsin Pamela Oliver.
Chapter 10 Looking Toward the Future Overcrowded Prisons, Drugs, Laws, and Race 7 million Americans under correctional supervision; 2 million in prison.
Deviance and the Criminal Justice System 1.Illegitimate Opportunity Structures and perceptions of crime in our society 2.The Criminal Justice System 3.The.
 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.
Criminal Justice System. Police –Most immediate control over who is arrested for a criminal act –Police discretion The power held by police officers to.
BJS ReEntry Highlights (note: yearend 2002). BJS ReEntry At least 95% of all State prisoners will be released from prison at some point; nearly 80%
C11: Probation and Corrections  Sean Taylor:  What was his crime?  What was his sentence?  Do you think he received special treatment?
Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice What is an appropriate punishment or response? What do you expect your response to do for the offender, potential.
Public and prisoners – views and opinions on sanction policy Miroslav Scheinost Institute of Criminology and Social Prevention Prague.
Crime and Punishment Unit Four Lesson Two Teacher’s Edition.
Crime Section, Central Statistics Office. 1.  The Policy Question  The Challenge to measuring recidivism  The Initial State of Affairs  The Benefits.
CRIMINAL LAW 1. Ahmed T. Ghandour.. PART 2. PENOLOGY.
South Dakota: Criminal Justice Reform
Corrections GOVT 2306, Module 10.
An Examination of AB109 Recidivism In San Joaquin County In Year 4
Corrections May 4, 2017.
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
7Y Thursday MN Juvenile Justice System
California State Association of Counties
The Use of Prisons in America
Class Name, Instructor Name
criminal castes, classes, and status groups
CRJ 303 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
CRJ 303 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
CRJ 303 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
CRJ 303 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com
BJS CORRECTIONS IN THE UNITED STATES
C10: Punishment and Sentencing
Chapter 6 Deviance and Crime.
Punishing Convicted Criminals
Existing sources at international level Doc. ESDTAT/D6/CR/04
CHAPTER 7 SECTION 3 CRIME.
Intro to Communication
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Warm Up (use 5.1) 1. What is deviance?
By Austin O'Neill and Rebecca Tibbs
Punishing Convicted Criminals
Chapter 2 The Incidence of Crime
Is the death penalty a fair sentence?
Chapter 7 Section 5: Crime and Punishment
The Impact of incarceration on the risk of violent recidivism
The National Landscape of Criminal Justice Reform
Presentation transcript:

Returns to Prison for Violent (and Non-Violent) Offenders Pamela E Oliver University of Wisconsin – Madison Marquette Conference on Alternatives to Revocation for Violent Offenders June 3, 2019

Return to Prison (or arrest) ≠ Recidivism Offender behavior + official behavior (surveillance + punishment) People commit crimes & don’t get caught (surveillance) Officials choose how to respond

University of Wisconsin–Madison Data National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP) term records 2000-2016. 43 states have at least 5 years of records in this interval only 20 states have records for all years Snapshots use the last year for which a state had valid data (2016 in 38 cases, earlier for another 5) 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison Violent Offenses 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison national_offlong1viol_type.png 5/8/19 term2016_offlong1_counts.do 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

States Vary in Their Offender Mix 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison state_scatter_pct_anyviolent_SIalt.png 5/9/19 term2016_offense_counts.do uses offense_counts_offgroup_all.dta created by frequency count tables that were generated by term2016_allspells_basic.do on 5/8/19 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison term2016_offlong1_counts.do offlong_dist_states_inSI.png 5/8/19 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison term2016_offlong1_counts.do offlong_dist_states_admSI.png 5/8/19 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison term2016_offlong1_counts.do offlong_dist_statesPrelSI.png 5/8/19 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison First Release 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison First release sample NCRP term records First record in NCRP, ends with a release from prison in 2000- 2016 Exclude: death, escape, other Types of release Unconditional To supervision (parole or its equivalent) 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison Outcome Did that person show up again in the merged term records created by Abt Associates? No record #2 = survival/success Other reasons for no record #2 Abt failure to match records Deported Died Incarcerated in another state If in the records a new violent crime in the record  definition of violent recidivism 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

Certainty of new crime information for returned violent offenders percent consistent no new crime 21 consistent new crime 48 inconsistent 20 uncertain 11 TOTAL 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

Combining Types of Readmissions (Violent Offenders) New violent crime New other crime No new crime Release Type Unc. Sup. Admit Type Commitment Violent Other Ambig. Prob. + new Prob only Parole + new Parole only None Release type: Unc= unconditional, Sup = to supervision. Ambiguous: there may be a new crime or not 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

Variations by offense, gender & race, state 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison These are the four groups with lots of state prisoners. There are more Asians than Native Americans in the population, but not in the prisons. 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison Data Summary Low rate of new violent crimes “ambiguous” looks more like no crime New offenses are more often nonviolent than violent Supervised release  high rate of re-incarceration with no new offense. Relatively low variation by offender characteristics Large between-state variation in returns to prison ?? Data coding?? (Some look like variations in data coding) Policy differences 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

University of Wisconsin–Madison Implications Why imprison? Vengeance or moral order Prevent future crimes Would those imprisoned have offended again if not imprisoned? Don’t be so quick to preemptively re-incarcerate people Preventing re-offending depends on crime type “Causes” of robbery are probably a desire for money, different from assaults, different from sex offenses. Don’t be naïve about “recidivism” data. It always measures BOTH offender behavior AND official behavior. 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison

Thank You Pamela Oliver pamela.oliver@wisc.edu @PamOliver1180 https:// www.ssc.wisc.edu/~oliver https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/soc/racepoliticsjustice/ 9/1/2019 University of Wisconsin–Madison