Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Advertisements

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23,
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
MEIC Electron Collider Ring Design Fanglei Lin MEIC Collaboration Meeting, October 5, 2015.
PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Third ILC Damping Rings R&D Mini-Workshop KEK, Tsukuba, Japan December 2007 Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski.
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
JLEIC Electron Collider Ring Design and Polarization
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Review of new High Energy Rings
Ion Collider Ring: Design and Polarization
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Vertical Dogleg Options for the Ion Collider Ring
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
The MEIC electron ring as the large ion booster
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
Summary of JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
JLEIC electron ring with damping wigglers
Presentation transcript:

Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016 Alternate JLEIC Electron Collider Ring Designs --- Use New Magnets to Obtain a Small Emittance Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016 F. Lin

Electron Ring Baseline Design Layout Circumference of 2154.28 m = 2 x 754.84 m arcs + 2 x 322.3 straights e- R=155m RF Spin rotator CCB Arc, 261.7 81.7 Forward e- detection IP Tune trombone & Straight FODOs Future 2nd IP 310 m 784 m

Summary of Baseline Design 2.2km electron collider ring was design reuse of PEP-II HER magnets mostly Two arcs are composed of 15.2m long FODO cells, dispersion suppression sections and spin rotators FODO cell and dispersion suppression (PEP-II magnets) dipole 5.4m, bending angle 2.8, bending radius 110.5m, sagitta 3.3 cm, 0.3 T @ 10 GeV, can reach 0.362 T @ 12 GeV with only ~0.2% saturation Quadrupole 0.56m, field gradient <13 T/m @ 10 GeV with saturation <0.4%, gradient ~14-15 T/m @ 12 GeV with saturation up to ~6% 108/108 x/y betatron phase advance in FODO cell Spin rotators have new dipoles, solenoids and quads (~25T/m @ 10 GeV). Straight FODO cells, tune trombone and matching sections use PEP-II 0.73m-long PEP-II quads and some new quads Chromaticity compensation block, RF sections and detector region use new dipoles and quads. Arcs contribute ~90% emittance and ~30-40% chromaticities.

Approaches of Reducing Emittance All following options have been investigated Optimizing of sections, such as matching section, spin rotator, etc., to reduce the emittance contribution (30%) Pros: do not change the optics of the rest of the ring, except some particular sections Cons: ~110m additional space and 16 quads are needed Adding (dipole) damping wigglers (50% @ 5 GeV) Pros: do not change the baseline design, fast damping Cons: need wigglers, more radiation power, larger energy spread (a factor of 2), high RF peak power if keep the same bunch length, not suitable at higher energies, may affect the polarization lifetime Offsetting the beam in quads (~ 7 to 8 mm) in arcs (48%) Pros: do not change the baseline design Cons: larger energy spread (a factor of 2), longer (maybe) bunch length, have to center the sextupoles New magnets (instead of PEP-II magnets) ring but still FODO cell arcs (50%) Pros: small dipole bending angle results in small emittance and no sagitta issue Cons: all new magnets, large chromaticities, strong sextupoles for chromaticity compensation due to small dispersion Different types of arc cell, such as DBA, TME (> 50%) Pros: much smaller emittance comparing to the FODO cell Cons: more quads, stronger quads, larger ring (possible), large chromaticities, chromaticity compensation scheme Need combine non-linear dynamic studies

New Magnet FODO Arc Cell e-Ring Complete electron collider ring optics circumference of 2181.89 m = 2 x 809.98 m arcs + 2 x 280.97 m straights

New Magnet FODO Arc Cell Arc FODO cell (Each arc has 54 such normal FODO cells) Length 11.4 m (half of ion ring arc cell) arc bending radius 155.45 m 108/108 x/y betatron phase advance Dipole Magnetic/physical length 3.6/3.88 m Bending angle 36.7 mrad (2.1), bending radius 98.2 m 0.34 T @ 10 GeV (0.41 @ 12 GeV) Sagitta 1.65 cm Quadrupoles Magnetic/physical length 0.56/0.62 m 17.5 T/m field gradients @ 10 GeV (21 T/m @ 12 GeV) 0.88 T @ 50 mm radius @ 10 GeV (1.06 T @ 12 GeV) Sextupoles Magnetic/physical length 0.25/0.31 m -624 and 262 T/m2 field strengths @ 10 GeV for chromaticity compensation of the whole ring 1.2 T and 0.5 T @ 60 mm radius @ 10 GeV (1.4 T and 0.6 T @ 12 GeV) BPMs and Correctors Physical length 0.05 and 0.3 m New Baseline

Comparison of e-Ring Parameters Baseline design (FODO arc cell) w/ PEP-II magnets Optimized baseline design (FODO arc cell) w/ PEP-II magnets New design (FODO arc cell) w/ new magnets Ring circumference m 2154 2186 2182 Bending angle per arc / figure-8 crossing angle deg 261.7 / 81.7 Beta stars at IP *x,y cm 10 / 2 Hor. / ver. chromaticities x,y -149 / -123 -113 / -120 -127 / -140 Momentum compaction factor  10-3 2.2 1.9 1.1 (reduce bunch length or V_peak ? ) Energy spread @ 5 and 10 GeV 10-4 4.6 / 9.1 4.5 / 9.0 4.6 / 9.3 Normalized emittance @ 5 and 10 GeV rad 137 / 1093 93 / 740 54 / 433 Hori. beam sizes at IP @ 5 and 10 GeV m 38 / 75 31 / 62 24 / 47 Arc FODO cell (2 dipoles, 2 quads per cell) length 15.2 (PEP-II cell length) 11.4 (half of ion ring arc cell) dipole length / sagitta m / cm 5.4 / 3.3 3.6 / 1.65 dipole bending angle / radius deg / m 2.8 / 110.5 2.1 / 98.2 quad length/strength @ 10 & 12 GeV m / T/m 0.56 / 13 / 15.6 0.56 / 17.5 / 21 cells per arc (including dispersion suppresser, no spin rotator) 42 44 58

Momentum Acceptance & Dynamic Aperture First look of momentum acceptance and dynamics aperture at 5 GeV by using 2 sextupole families for linear chromaticity correction only, no errors. Chromatic tunes and chromatic * Dynamic aperture (-7, +13)σp/p ±20 σx

New Magnet TME-like Arc Cell e-Ring Complete electron collider ring optics circumference of 2166.82 m = 2 x 786.08 m arcs + 2 x 297.33 m straights

New Magnet TME-like Arc Cell Arc TME-like cell (Each arc has 26 such normal TME-like cells) Length 22.8 m (same as ion ring arc cell) arc bending radius 155.45 m 270/90 x/y betatron phase advance Dipole Magnetic/physical length 4.0/4.28 m Bending angle 36.7 mrad (2.1), bending radius 109.1 m 0.31 T @ 10 GeV (0.37 @ 12 GeV) Sagitta 1.83 cm Quadrupoles Magnetic/physical length 0.56/0.62 and 1.0/1.06 m 20 T/m field gradients @ 10 GeV (24 T/m @ 12 GeV) 1.0 T @ 50 mm radius @ 10 GeV (1.2 T @ 12 GeV) Sextupoles Magnetic/physical length 0.25/0.31 m 400 and 604 T/m2 field strengths @ 10 GeV for chromaticity compensation of the whole ring 0.72 T and 1.08 T @ 60 mm radius @ 10 GeV (0.86 T and 1.3 T @ 12 GeV) BPMs and Correctors Physical length 0.05 and 0.25 m

Comparison of e-Ring Parameters Optimized baseline design (FODO arc cell) w/ PEP-II magnets New design (FODO arc cell) w/ new magnets New design (TME arc cell) w/ new magnets Ring circumference m 2186 2182 2167 Bending angle per arc / figure-8 crossing angle deg 261.7 / 81.7 Beta stars at IP *x,y cm 10 / 2 Hor. / ver. chromaticities x,y -113 / -120 -127 / -140 -152 / -150 Momentum compaction factor  10-3 1.9 1.1 (reduce bunch length or V_peak) 0.5 (reduce bunch length or V_peak) Energy spread @ 5 and 10 GeV 10-4 4.5 / 9.0 4.6 / 9.3 4.5 / 9.1 Normalized emittance @ 5 and 10 GeV rad 93 / 740 54 / 433 31 / 247 Hori. beam sizes at IP @ 5 and 10 GeV m 31 / 62 24 / 47 18 / 36 Arc TME-like cell (4 dipoles, 4 quads per cell) length 15.2 (PEP-II cell length) 11.4 (half of ion ring arc cell) 22.8 ( ion ring arc cell) dipole length / sagitta m / cm 5.4 / 3.3 3.6 / 1.65 4.0 / 1.83 dipole bending angle / radius deg / m 2.8 / 110.5 2.1 / 98.2 2.1 / 109.1 quad length/strength @ 10 & 12 GeV m / T/m 0.56 / 13 / 15.6 0.56 / 17.5 / 21 0.56, 1.0 / 20 / 24 cells per arc (including dispersion suppresser, no spin rotator) 44 58 28

Momentum Acceptance & Dynamic Aperture First look of momentum acceptance and dynamics aperture at 5 GeV by using 2 sextupole families for linear chromaticity correction only, no errors. Chromatic tunes and chromatic * Dynamic aperture (-12, +12) σp/p ±10 σx

Summary of Three Optics Designs ±20σx (-7.8, +5.6) σp/p Optimized baseline e-ring design with FODO arc cells (PEP-II magnets) ±20 σx (-7, +13)σp/p New magnet e-ring design with FODO arc cells ±10 σx (-12, +12)σp/p New magnet e-ring design with TME-like arc cells

Thank You for Your Attention !

Coupled Emittance In an electron storage ring without vertical bending and coupling, the natural horizontal emittance can be calculated by and the natural vertical emittance usually is a few orders of magnitude smaller than the horizontal one. A coupling effect can be introduced to a flat electron ring to obtain a non-flat beam. Assume the emittance coupling ratio k= y/x , then Here x,0 is the natural horizontal emittance. They satisfy x + y =x,0, and it has x/x,0=1/(1+k). JLEIC requires non-flat electron beams with k=y/x=1:5. Then x/x,0=0.83. I used the uncoupled natural horizontal emittance x,0 for the calculation of horizontal beam size, and x,0/5 for the calculation of vertical beam size. The beam sizes are overestimated by ~10%.