Peng Chen, Kevin D. Gillis  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (October 2007)
Advertisements

Geometrical Properties of Gel and Fluid Clusters in DMPC/DSPC Bilayers: Monte Carlo Simulation Approach Using a Two-State Model  István P. Sugár, Ekaterina.
Adam J. Sherman, Alvin Shrier, Ellis Cooper  Biophysical Journal 
Mark Ospeck, Kuni H. Iwasa  Biophysical Journal 
Oluwarotimi Okunade, Joseph Santos-Sacchi  Biophysical Journal 
Sodium Entry during Action Potentials of Mammalian Neurons: Incomplete Inactivation and Reduced Metabolic Efficiency in Fast-Spiking Neurons  Brett C.
Rundown of the Hyperpolarization-Activated KAT1 Channel Involves Slowing of the Opening Transitions Regulated by Phosphorylation  Xiang D. Tang, Toshinori.
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
M.J. Mason, A.K. Simpson, M.P. Mahaut-Smith, H.P.C. Robinson 
Differential Modulation of Cardiac Ca2+ Channel Gating by β-Subunits
Victor G. Romanenko, George H. Rothblat, Irena Levitan 
Krzysztof R. Grzęda, Justus M.B. Anumonwo, Ryan O'Connell, José Jalife 
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
A. Delon, Y. Usson, J. Derouard, T. Biben, C. Souchier 
Unitary Conductance Variation in Kir2
Mechanosensitivity of N-Type Calcium Channel Currents
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Physiological Pathway of Magnesium Influx in Rat Ventricular Myocytes
Determining the Activation Time Course of Synaptic AMPA Receptors from Openings of Colocalized NMDA Receptors  Ingo C. Kleppe, Hugh P.C. Robinson  Biophysical.
Modulation of the Gating of Unitary Cardiac L-Type Ca2+ Channels by Conditioning Voltage and Divalent Ions  Ira R. Josephson, Antonio Guia, Edward G.
Knut Debus, Manfred Lindau  Biophysical Journal 
External Ba2+ Block of Human Kv1
Gustav Persson, Per Thyberg, Jerker Widengren  Biophysical Journal 
Amanda H. Lewis, Alisa F. Cui, Malcolm F. McDonald, Jörg Grandl 
Kinetic and Energetic Analysis of Thermally Activated TRPV1 Channels
Analysis of Dynamic Brain Imaging Data
Khaled Machaca, H. Criss Hartzell  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Carlos A. Obejero-Paz, Stephen W. Jones, Antonio Scarpa 
Katie C. Bittner, Dorothy A. Hanck  Biophysical Journal 
X.-x. Dong, D. Ehrenstein, K.H. Iwasa  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
High Sensitivity of Stark-Shift Voltage-Sensing Dyes by One- or Two-Photon Excitation Near the Red Spectral Edge  Bernd Kuhn, Peter Fromherz, Winfried.
Sripriya Ramamoorthy, Alfred L. Nuttall  Biophysical Journal 
KCNKØ: Single, Cloned Potassium Leak Channels Are Multi-Ion Pores
Dmitrii V. Vavilin, Esa Tyystjärvi, Eva-Mari Aro  Biophysical Journal 
Excitability of the Soma in Central Nervous System Neurons
C.A. Bertrand, D.M. Durand, G.M. Saidel, C. Laboisse, U. Hopfer 
Daniel Krofchick, Mel Silverman  Biophysical Journal 
Blockers of VacA Provide Insights into the Structure of the Pore
Clustering of Cyclic-Nucleotide-Gated Channels in Olfactory Cilia
Effects of Temperature on Heteromeric Kv11.1a/1b and Kv11.3 Channels
Mouhamed S. Awayda, Willy Van Driessche, Sandy I. Helman 
Stuart L. Johnson, Maryline Beurg, Walter Marcotti, Robert Fettiplace 
Volume 105, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Vladimir Avdonin, Toshinori Hoshi  Biophysical Journal 
Elementary Functional Properties of Single HCN2 Channels
Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy of mCherry in Living Cells
Cyclic AMP Diffusion Coefficient in Frog Olfactory Cilia
Kinetics of P2X7 Receptor-Operated Single Channels Currents
J. Gao, W. Wang, I.S. Cohen, R.T. Mathias  Biophysical Journal 
Scott M. Blackman, Eric J. Hustedt, Charles E. Cobb, Albert H. Beth 
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
R.P. Schuhmeier, B. Dietze, D. Ursu, F. Lehmann-Horn, W. Melzer 
Voltage-Dependent Blockade of Connexin40 Gap Junctions by Spermine
Antonella Gradogna, Michael Pusch  Biophysical Journal 
Frequency-Dependent Shear Impedance of the Tectorial Membrane
Two-Microelectrode Voltage Clamp of Xenopus Oocytes: Voltage Errors and Compensation for Local Current Flow  W. Baumgartner, L. Islas, F.J. Sigworth 
Yassine El Hiani, Paul Linsdell  Biophysical Journal 
Rony Azouz, Charles M. Gray  Neuron 
David Naranjo, Hua Wen, Paul Brehm  Biophysical Journal 
ATP Inhibition and Rectification of a Ca2+-Activated Anion Channel in Sarcoplasmic Reticulum of Skeletal Muscle  Gerard P. Ahern, Derek R. Laver  Biophysical.
Stimulatory Action of Internal Protons on Slo1 BK Channels
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Impedance Analysis and Single-Channel Recordings on Nano-Black Lipid Membranes Based on Porous Alumina  Winfried Römer, Claudia Steinem  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

The Noise of Membrane Capacitance Measurements in the Whole-Cell Recording Configuration  Peng Chen, Kevin D. Gillis  Biophysical Journal  Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages 2162-2170 (October 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76464-2 Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The equivalent circuit of a cell in the whole-cell recording configuration. RA is the access resistance between the pipette and the cell interior, Rm is the membrane resistance, and Cm is the membrane capacitance. vp is the voltage between the pipette and bath ground, whereas ip is the current into the pipette. The capacitance between the pipette and bath ground is neglected because the current through this pathway is electronically subtracted using pipette capacitance compensation circuitry of the patch-clamp amplifier. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76464-2) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The phase-sensitive detector (lock-in amplifier) acts as a band-pass filter. The amplitude of the transfer function of the phase-sensitive detector is plotted versus frequency. The darker solid line is for a software phase-sensitive detector with m (the number of sine wave cycles that are used for the calculation)=1 (see Eq. 7). The lighter line is for a software phase-sensitive detector with m=10. Note that the phase-sensitive detector becomes more selective for frequencies near that of the stimulus (fc) as m increases. The dashed line depicts the transfer function for a hardware lock-in amplifier with a single time constant filter, τ=5/fc. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76464-2) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Cm noise of a model circuit can be predicted using Eq. 14. The model circuit (MC-9) had nominal values of Cm=22pF, RA=5 MΩ, and Rm=0.5 GΩ. (A) The squares indicate the measured Cm noise (standard deviation), whereas the dashed line indicates the theoretical noise from Eq. 12 (Gillis 1995). The solid line is calculated from Eq. 14. Note that the correction factor in Eq. 14 is necessary to describe the noise at low frequencies. The value of m was adjusted so that the noise bandwidth (fc/m) was always 100Hz. The amplitude of the sine wave stimulus was 10mV. (B) At low frequencies, increasing m steeply decreases the noise of Cm estimates, which indicates a correlation between estimates. The triangles were obtained for a stimulus of 200Hz, whereas the circles were obtained for a stimulus of 2kHz. The dashed lines indicate the expected noise from Eq. 12, whereas the solid lines are from Eq. 14. The amplitude of the sine wave stimulus was 25mV for these measurements. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76464-2) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 1/f current noise dominates at low frequencies in whole-cell measurements. (A) The current power spectral density is plotted as a function of the measured Real part of the admittance. The solid line indicates the relationship expected for thermal noise (SI=4kT Real{Y(f)}). The crosses indicate values measured from 6 cells (4 chromaffin, 2 NIH-3T3) for frequencies between 1 and 5kHz. The squares indicate values measured from the same cells between 200 and 500Hz. The chromaffin cells had the following equivalent circuit parameters (mean±SD). Cm, 6.2±1.2pF; Rm, 8.1±1.2 GΩ; RA, 8.2±2.6 MΩ. The NIH-3T3 cells had the following parameters: Cm, 10.1, 10.6pF; Rm, 5.3, 2.3 GΩ; RA, 5.9, 5.6 MΩ. (B) Circles indicate the current power spectral density for a typical chromaffin cell held at −70mV. The line indicates a fit of Eq. 15 to the noise, which resulted in an estimated value of 2.9×10−26 A2 for the amplitude of the 1/f component (A). Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76464-2) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 (A) 1/f Noise does not depend on voltage or cell type if voltage-dependent channels are blocked. Voltage-dependent channels were blocked by including 10μM tetrodotoxin and 50μM CdCl2 in the bath solution. The amplitude of the 1/f component (A) was found by fitting Eq. 15 to the current power spectral density and is plotted as a function of the dc holding potential (Vp). The solid lines are from 4 chromaffin cells, whereas the dashed lines are from 2 NIH-3T3 cells. The equivalent circuit parameters for the cells are given in the legend to Fig. 4. The dark line indicates the average value. (B) 1/f Current noise leads to increased Cm noise at low frequencies. The squares indicate measurements from a typical chromaffin cell. The dashed line indicates the predicted noise from Eq. 14 (neglecting 1/f noise), and the solid line includes the predicted noise of the 1/f component given by Eq. 17. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76464-2) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Cm noise of cells in the whole-cell recording configuration can be predicted using Eqs. 14 and 17. The circles indicate theoretical and measured Cm noise from 6 cells (4 chromaffin and 2 NIH-3T3) for stimulus frequencies between 200Hz and 5kHz. The solid line has a slope of 1. Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76464-2) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 The noise of capacitance estimates can be reduced by compensating for the series resistance. The squares and the solid line were taken from Fig. 3 A and indicate the noise measurements and theoretical response (Eq. 14) for a model circuit. The filled circles indicate measurements where 50% series resistance compensation in the patch-clamp amplifier is used. The diamonds indicate noise levels measured when the amplitude of the stimulus sinusoid is boosted to compensate for the voltage drop across RA (see Eq. 18). The dot-dash line indicates the minimum noise expected for this case (Eq. 14). Biophysical Journal 2000 79, 2162-2170DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76464-2) Copyright © 2000 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions