Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (September 2009)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Mark A Willis, Barney Bishop, Lynne Regan, Axel T Brunger  Structure 
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Crystal Structure of Riboflavin Synthase
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Principles of Protein-DNA Recognition Revealed in the Structural Analysis of Ndt80- MSE DNA Complexes  Jason S. Lamoureux, J.N. Mark Glover  Structure 
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Biochemical Implications of a Three-Dimensional Model of Monomeric Actin Bound to Magnesium-Chelated ATP  Keiji Takamoto, J.K. Amisha Kamal, Mark R. Chance 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Structural Basis for Catalytic Activation of a Serine Recombinase
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Aude Echalier, Celia F. Goodhew, Graham W. Pettigrew, Vilmos Fülöp 
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Huiying Li, Michael R. Sawaya, F. Robert Tabita, David Eisenberg 
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Gregory J. Miller, James H. Hurley  Molecular Cell 
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Structure of the Oxygen Sensor in Bacillus subtilis
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1590-1598 (September 2016) Domain-Swapped Dimers of Intracellular Lipid-Binding Proteins: Evidence for Ordered Folding Intermediates  Zahra Assar, Zahra Nossoni, Wenjing Wang, Elizabeth M. Santos, Kevin Kramer, Colin McCornack, Chrysoula Vasileiou, Babak Borhan, James H. Geiger  Structure  Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1590-1598 (September 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.05.022 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2016 24, 1590-1598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.05.022) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Crystal Structures of hCRBPII Dimer Species and Comparison with Their Monomeric Structures (A) Chain A of KLY60W (where only the Thr56 psi angle differs from the closed monomer form) with the electron density, contoured at 1.0 σ, of the hinge loop region encompassing amino acids 55–60. Residues 55–60 are highlighted. Atoms colored by type: N, blue; O, red; C, cyan. Color scheme retained unless otherwise noted. (B) Chain B of the KLY60W mutant showing the electron density contoured at 1.0 σ of the hinge loop region encompassing amino acids 55–60. Residues 55–60 are highlighted (C, pink). (C) The structure of the KLY60W dimer: In chain A (cyan), Trp60 is pointing inside the binding pocket, while in chain B (pink), Trp60 is pointing toward the solvent. (D) An overlay of the dimeric (cyan) and monomeric (red) KLY60W mutant structures. Res56 for both structures is shown in sticks. The hinge loop region in the monomer and dimer is highlighted, showing the dramatic difference in the two structures. Structure 2016 24, 1590-1598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.05.022) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A Comparison of Symmetric and Asymmetric hCRBPII Dimers Res60 in all structures is shown as a stick model. (A) An overlay of the asymmetric dimers: KLY60W (cyan) and Y60W (orange) showing that they are virtually identical. (B) An overlay of the symmetric WT hCRBPII (purple) and Y60L (yellow) dimers. (C) A comparison of the symmetric and asymmetric dimers. The C-terminal 76 amino acids of the Y60L (yellow) and chain A of the KLY60W (cyan) dimers are overlaid (on the left side of the figure). Both chains of the dimers are shown. (D) The C-terminal 76 amino acids of the symmetric Y60L (yellow) and chain A (orange) and chain B (blue) of the Y60W dimers are overlaid, showing the large deviation of the N-terminal regions of the three chains. Structure 2016 24, 1590-1598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.05.022) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Torsional Deviations Outside the Hinge-Loop Region Define the Relative Orientation of the Two Domains of the Dimer, with the Highest Deviation Seen in Asn59 The loss of the E72/Y60 hydrogen bond leads to a dimer without Ramachandran outliers. (A) The WT (purple) and Y60L (yellow) dimers are overlaid. Inset, the hydrogen bond between Tyr60 and Glu72 compared to the flipped-out conformation of Leu60. (B) The critical Tyr60 and Asn59 region in the WT hCRBPII dimer, showing the key phi/psi angles. (C) The same region in the Y60L dimer, showing the flipped-out Leu60 and the key phi/psi angles. Comparison of the two shows how the large difference in the phi angle is compensated for in the psi angle, keeping the main chain of the two on a similar trajectory. This necessitates the large Ramachandran deviation in the psi angle of the WT hCRBPII dimer. (D) Overlay of chain A of the E72A dimer (green) and the Y60L dimer (yellow). Note that both show residue 60 pointing toward the solvent. (E) Overlay of the E72A chain A (purple) and WT (green) dimers. Inset shows that, without the E72/Y60 hydrogen bond, residue 60 is free to flip out, leading to a more relaxed dimer structure. Structure 2016 24, 1590-1598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.05.022) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Model of folding in hCRBPII The model hypothesizes that an open monomer folding intermediate leads to domain-swapped dimerization and requires proper relative orientation of the two halves of the open monomer: Left, the two A chains of an asymmetric dimer cannot dimerize due to severe steric clashes. Right, the A and B chains of the asymmetric dimer fit perfectly to form a stable, asymmetric dimer. Structure 2016 24, 1590-1598DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.05.022) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions