Regulation of the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER-BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE genes/microRNA156 Module by the Homeodomain Proteins PENNYWISE and POUND- FOOLISH in Arabidopsis 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (March 2012)
Advertisements

Testing the ABC floral-organ identity model: expression of A and C function genes Objectives: To test the validity of the ABC model for floral organ identity.
Figure 1. drb7.2 mutant plants display altered accumulation of endoIR-siRNA. Wild-type (Col-0) and drb7.2 mutant plants were subjected to high throughput.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)
Jeroen Witteveldt, Alasdair Ivens, Sara Macias  Cell Reports 
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (July 2012)
A LEAFY co-regulator encoded by UNUSUAL FLORAL ORGANS
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 17, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
FT, A Mobile Developmental Signal in Plants
Temporal Control of Plant Organ Growth by TCP Transcription Factors
Volume 23, Issue 20, Pages (October 2013)
Constitutive Expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) Gene Disrupts Circadian Rhythms and Suppresses Its Own Expression  Zhi-Yong Wang, Elaine.
MiR156-Regulated SPL Transcription Factors Define an Endogenous Flowering Pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana  Jia-Wei Wang, Benjamin Czech, Detlef Weigel 
A Truncated Arabidopsis NUCLEOSOME ASSEMBLY PROTEIN 1, AtNAP1;3T, Alters Plant Growth Responses to Abscisic Acid and Salt in the Atnap1;3-2 Mutant  Liu.
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
FT Protein Acts as a Long-Range Signal in Arabidopsis
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 24, Pages (December 2008)
Plant Phase Transitions Make a SPLash
H3K36 Methylation Is Involved in Promoting Rice Flowering
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
AGO1 Homeostasis Entails Coexpression of MIR168 and AGO1 and Preferential Stabilization of miR168 by AGO1  Hervé Vaucheret, Allison C. Mallory, David.
Expression of a microRNA-Resistant Target Transgene Misrepresents the Functional Significance of the Endogenous microRNA: Target Gene Relationship  Junyan.
Competence to Respond to Floral Inductive Signals Requires the Homeobox Genes PENNYWISE and POUND-FOOLISH  Harley M.S Smith, Bruce C Campbell, Sarah Hake 
SKIP Interacts with the Paf1 Complex to Regulate Flowering via the Activation of FLC Transcription in Arabidopsis  Ying Cao, Liguo Wen, Zheng Wang, Ligeng.
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
The PHANTASTICA Gene Encodes a MYB Transcription Factor Involved in Growth and Dorsoventrality of Lateral Organs in Antirrhinum  Richard Waites, Harinee.
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Phytochrome Signaling in Green Arabidopsis Seedlings: Impact Assessment of a Mutually Negative phyB–PIF Feedback Loop  Pablo Leivar, Elena Monte, Megan.
To Bloom or Not to Bloom: Role of MicroRNAs in Plant Flowering
Volume 22, Issue 19, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (July 2012)
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
The Nuclear dsRNA Binding Protein HYL1 Is Required for MicroRNA Accumulation and Plant Development, but Not Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing  Franck.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Repression of MYBL2 by Both microRNA858a and HY5 Leads to the Activation of Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Arabidopsis  Yulong Wang, Yiqing Wang,
Jeroen Witteveldt, Alasdair Ivens, Sara Macias  Cell Reports 
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
A miRNA Involved in Phosphate-Starvation Response in Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Negative Regulation of Tumor Suppressor p53 by MicroRNA miR-504
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)
Inactivation of BOP1, BOP2, TGA1, and TGA4 corrects pny pnf meristem arrest. Inactivation of BOP1, BOP2, TGA1, and TGA4 corrects pny pnf meristem arrest.
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
Dissection of miRNA Pathways Using Arabidopsis Mesophyll Protoplasts
Arabidopsis ABF3 and ABF4 Transcription Factors Act with the NF-YC Complex to Regulate SOC1 Expression and Mediate Drought-Accelerated Flowering  Keumbi.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Doris Wagner, Elliot M. Meyerowitz  Current Biology 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Wang Long , Mai Yan-Xia , Zhang Yan-Chun , Luo Qian , Yang Hong-Quan  
The bHLH Transcription Factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 Are Required for Jasmonate- Mediated Inhibition of Flowering in Arabidopsis  Houping Wang, Yang Li,
Arabidopsis PLETHORA Transcription Factors Control Phyllotaxis
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Regulation of the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER-BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE genes/microRNA156 Module by the Homeodomain Proteins PENNYWISE and POUND- FOOLISH in Arabidopsis  Lal Shruti , Pacis Leo Bryan , Smith Harley M.S.   Molecular Plant  Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 1123-1132 (November 2011) DOI: 10.1093/mp/ssr041 Copyright © 2011 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Analysis of SPL and AP1 Transcript Levels by Q–PCR in Wild-Type and pny pnf Shoot Apices. After 30 d of growth in short days, an environmental condition that delays flowering, Q–PCR was used to determine the transcript levels of (A, B) SPL3, (C, D) SPL4, (E, F) SPL5, and (G, H) AP1 in wild-type and pny pnf vegetative shoot apices. After 30 of growth in non-photoinductive conditions, wild-type and pny pnf plants were shifted to long-day growth conditions to induce flowering. In these plants, Q–PCR was utilized to determine the transcript levels for (A, B) SPL3, (C, D) SPL4, (E, F) SPL5, and (G, H) AP1 in wild-type and pny pnf florally induced apices. Transcript levels for SPLs and AP1 were normalized against the mRNA levels for UBQUITIN5. Numbers on the x-axis refer to the number of days that the 30 short-day-grown wild-type and pny pnf plants were grown in floral-inductive conditions. Numbers on the y-axis refer to the relative gene expression. Each time point is a mean of the relative gene expression (± standard error of the mean). Molecular Plant 2011 4, 1123-1132DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr041) Copyright © 2011 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Expression Levels of miR156 in the Apices of pny pnf Plants. (A) Northern blot analysis was used to determine the levels of miRNA156 in wild-type (WT) and pny pnf apices. The levels of miR156 were examined during vegetative growth, after 20 d of growth in short days (SD) and long days (LD). The levels for miR156 were determined after 30 d of growth in long days for wild-type and pny pnf apices. At this time point, wild-type plants were initiating flowers. In pny pnf plants, apices were harvested after 40 d of growth in long days. A doublet was detected after probing blots with miR156, in which the upper and lower bands correspond to miR157 and miR156, respectively (Wu and Poethig, 2006). The sequences of miR156 and miR157 are similar; therefore, miR157 may also play a role in post-transcriptional regulation of SPLs (Rhoades et al., 2002; Gandikota et al., 2007). The U6 small nuclear RNA was used as a loading control. The numbers at the base of the miR156 blots correspond to the expression levels of miR156 for each experiment. (B) The levels of miR156 were quantified by scanning three Northern blots derived from three biological replicates. The levels of U6 were quantified and used to normalize the levels of miR156. Molecular Plant 2011 4, 1123-1132DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr041) Copyright © 2011 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Ectopic Expression of SPL4 in pny pnf Partially Restored Flower Formation. The inflorescences shoots for (A) wild-type. (B) An image of a pny pnf plant. (C) Close-up of the leaf-bearing pny pnf apex. (D) 35S:rSPL4. (E) An image of a 35S:rSPL4 pny pnf plant (arrow points at the inflorescence shoots). (F) An inflorescence shoot was removed from a 35S:rSPL4 pny pnf plant (arrows point at terminal flowers). (G) Close-up of a 35S:rSPL4 pny pnf terminal flower composed of two partially fused carpels. (H) All plants were grown in long-day growth conditions. Transcript levels for SPL4, LFY, AP1, and ACTIN 2 were determined in wild-type (WT), pny pnf, and 35S:rSPL4 pny pnf shoot apices after 30 d of growth. Since 35S:rSPL4 flowered early, inflorescence apices were collected after 15 d of growth. Molecular Plant 2011 4, 1123-1132DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr041) Copyright © 2011 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ectopic Expression of SPL5 in pny pnf Alters the Identity of the Leaf. (A) An image of a 35S:rSPL5 inflorescence and (B) a 35S:rSPL5 pny pnf plant. (C, D) Close-up images of the 35S:rSPL5 pny pnf terminal leaf-like structures. (E, F) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the terminal leaf-like organs with (F) a structure protruding from the margin (arrow). Cell types found on the surfaces of (G, H) the terminal leaf-like organs in 35S:rSPL5 pny pnf, (I) a pny pnf leaf and wild-type (J) sepals and (K) carpels. (L) All plants were grown in long-day growth conditions. Transcript levels for SPL5, LFY, AP1, and ACTIN2 were determined in wild-type (WT), pny pnf, and 35S:rSPL5 pny pnf shoot apices after 30 d of growth. Since 35S:rSPL5 flowered early, inflorescence apices were collected after 15 d of growth. (E) Scale bar = 500 μm; (F) Scale bar = 100 μm; (G–K) Scale bars = 50 μm. Molecular Plant 2011 4, 1123-1132DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr041) Copyright © 2011 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Ectopic Expression of 35S:rSPL3 in pny pnf Plants. (A) An image of a 35S:rSPL3 inflorescence and (B) a 35S:rSPL3 pny pnf plant. (C) A close-up of 35S:rSPL3 pny pnf shoot apex (arrow points at the apex). (D) SEM image of a leaf initiated late in development in 35S:rSPL3 pny pnf. Scale bar = 100 μm. (E) SEM image of the surface of a pny pnf leaf. Scale bar = 100 μm. (F) All plants were grown in long-day growth conditions. Transcript levels for SPL3, LFY, AP1, and ACTIN2 were determined in wild-type (WT), pny pnf, and 35S:rSPL3 pny pnf shoot apices after 30 d of growth. Since 35S:rSPL3 flowered early, inflorescence apices were collected after 15 d of growth. Molecular Plant 2011 4, 1123-1132DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr041) Copyright © 2011 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Role of PNY and PNF in the Flower Specification Network. A model is shown that displays the photoperiod and endogenous flower specification pathways. FT–FD activate SPL3/SPL4/SPL5 (collectively referred to as SPLs) and act in parallel to induce SOC1 and FUL as well as flower meristem identity genes. FT requires PNY and PNF for specifying flower meristem identity and regulating SPL3, SPL4, and SPL5. In addition, PNY and PNF control the accumulation of SPL3, SPL4, and SPL5 transcripts by repressing miR156 during shoot development. Based on the results in this manuscript, PNY and PNF may function in parallel with SPL3, SPL4, and SPL5. The dashed line between PNY/PNF and miR156 indicates that the nature of this regulation is not known. Molecular Plant 2011 4, 1123-1132DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr041) Copyright © 2011 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions