Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (March 2016)
Predominance of type 2 cytokine–producing CD4+ and CD8+ cells in patients with atopic dermatitis  Masatoshi Nakazawa, DVMa, Nakako Sugi, MDb, Hiroshi.
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Inhibition of Th1 Differentiation by IL-6 Is Mediated by SOCS1
Preactivation with IL-12, IL-15, and IL-18 Induces CD25 and a Functional High-Affinity IL-2 Receptor on Human Cytokine-Induced Memory-like Natural Killer.
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 120, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
IRF4 is required for anabolic induction of CD4+ T cells.
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
17β-estradiol, Progesterone, and Dihydrotestosterone Suppress the Growth of Human Melanoma by Inhibiting Interleukin-8 Production  Naoko Kanda, Shinichi.
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Enhanced sensitivity to inhibition of SHP2, STAT5, and Gab2 expression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)‏ by Michaela Scherr, Anuhar Chaturvedi, Karin.
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2018)
Kathleen R. Bartemes, BA, Gail M. Kephart, BS, Stephanie J
Akio Horiguchi, Mototsugu Oya, Ken Marumo, Masaru Murai 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Exogenous IL-4 cannot rescue Th2 cytokine expression in HuR-deficient cells. Exogenous IL-4 cannot rescue Th2 cytokine expression in HuR-deficient cells.
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 13, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Stefanie S. Schalm, Diane C. Fingar, David M. Sabatini, John Blenis 
17β-Estradiol Enhances Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Production and Dihydrotestosterone Antagonizes the Enhancement via the Regulation of Adenylate.
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Promotion Effects of miR-375 on the Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Adipose- Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells  Si Chen, Yunfei Zheng, Shan Zhang, Lingfei.
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Essential Role of TGF-β Signaling in Glucose-Induced Cell Hypertrophy
GRM7 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis via CREB and YAP
Andrew T Miller, Heather M Wilcox, Zhongbin Lai, Leslie J Berg 
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Rsk1 mediates a MEK–MAP kinase cell survival signal
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
17β-Estradiol Inhibits Oxidative Stress-Induced Apoptosis in Keratinocytes by Promoting Bcl-2 Expression  Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe  Journal of Investigative.
High Nutrient Levels and TORC1 Activity Reduce Cell Viability following Prolonged Telomere Dysfunction and Cell Cycle Arrest  Julia Klermund, Katharina.
Targeted Cleavage of Signaling Proteins by Caspase 3 Inhibits T Cell Receptor Signaling in Anergic T Cells  Irene Puga, Anjana Rao, Fernando Macian  Immunity 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Duy Pham, PhD, Sarita Sehra, PhD, Xin Sun, PhD, Mark H. Kaplan, PhD 
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Suman Paul, Anuj K. Kashyap, Wei Jia, You-Wen He, Brian C. Schaefer 
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (February 2015)
Repulsive Guidance Molecule-a Is Involved in Th17-Cell-Induced Neurodegeneration in Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis  Shogo Tanabe, Toshihide Yamashita  Cell.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 910-918 (May 2017) STAT3 Regulation of Citrate Synthase Is Essential during the Initiation of Lymphocyte Cell Growth  Sarah MacPherson, Michael Horkoff, Cleo Gravel, Thomas Hoffmann, Johannes Zuber, Julian J. Lum  Cell Reports  Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 910-918 (May 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.012 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 19, 910-918DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.012) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Inhibition of STAT3 Prevents Recovery of Cell Growth and Proliferation in Response to Growth Factor Signaling (A) Phospho- and total ERK, AKT, and STAT3 activity in DKO cells in the presence of IL-3 (+), 21 days post-IL-3 withdrawal (−), and hours after IL-3 readdition (representative of n = 3). (B) Phospho- and total STAT3 and STAT5 in 14-day IL-3-deprived DKO cells (−), 24 hr after IL-3 readdition, with or without WP1066 (representative of n = 3). (C) Cell size measured by forward scatter (FSC) after IL-3 readdition with or without WP1066. (D) Cell number after IL-3 readdition, with or without WP1066. Fold change was calculated by dividing the IL-3-readdition cell number by the 14 day IL-3-deprived cell number. (E) Cell size in CD8+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 with or without WP1066. (F) Cell number of CD8+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 with or without WP1066. (G) Cell size in human PBMCs stimulated with PHA with or without WP1066. (H) Cell number of human PBMCs stimulated with PHA with or without WP1066 calculated as in (D). (I) Cell size in CD4-Cre STAT3+/+ or CD4-Cre STAT3−/− after stimulation. (J) Cell number of CD4-Cre STAT3+/+ or CD4-Cre STAT3−/− after stimulation. (K) Change in DKO cell size from 6 to 24 hr in response to IL-3 readdition for three independent shVEC and shSTAT3 clones. (L) Fold change in DKO cell number in shVEC and three shSTAT3 clones measured days after IL-3 readdition calculated as in (D). Panels (C), (D), (I), and (J) show average ± SEM (n = 3, Student’s t test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01). Panels (E)–(H), (K), and (L) show average ± SD (n = 3, one-way ANOVA plus a Dunnet post-test, ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). Cell Reports 2017 19, 910-918DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.012) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 STAT3 Inhibition Blocks the Recovery of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, Citrate Synthase Expression, and Citrate (A) Mitochondrial membrane potential measured by TMRE in DKO cells cultured in the absence of IL-3 for 14 days (gray-filled histogram), after IL-3 readdition with or without WP1066 (representative of n = 3). (B) Quantification of the TMRE staining, as shown in (A). MFI, mean fluorescent intensity. (C) Mitochondrial mass days after IL-3 readdition with or without WP1066. (D) Intracellular citrate levels in DKO cells in the presence of IL-3, 14 days post-IL-3 withdrawal, and 48 hr after IL-3 readdition with or without WP1066. (E) Relative CS mRNA expression 14 days post-IL-3 withdrawal (-IL-3) and hours after IL-3 readdition with or without WP1066. Panels (B)–(E) show average ± SEM (n = 3, Student’s t test; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001). (F) Levels of phospho- and total STAT3 and CS 14 days post IL-3 withdrawal and hours after IL-3 readdition in shVEC or shSTAT3 cells (representative of n = 3). (G) Intracellular citrate levels in shVEC or shSTAT3 cells 14 days post-IL-3 withdrawal and 24 hr after IL-3 readdition. Graph shows average ± SD (n = 3, one-way ANOVA plus a Dunnet post-test; ∗p < 0.05). Cell Reports 2017 19, 910-918DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.012) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 STAT3 Transcriptionally Regulates Expression of Citrate Synthase during Early IL-3 Recovery (A) DKO cells were starved for 14 days; 4 hr after IL-3 readdition, cell lysates were analyzed for STAT3 binding by ChIP (representative of n = 3). (B) Quantification of ChIP PCR from (A). (C) STAT3 luciferase reporter activity 6 hr after IL-3 readdition. Fold change in luciferase in the empty vector control (VEC), the wild-type (WT), and the mutant binding site (MT). Graph shows average ± SEM (n = 3, Student’s t test, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001). (D and E) (D) STAT3 reporter activity or (E) change in DKO cell size from 6 to 24 hr in response to IL-3 readdition for shVEC and shSTAT3 cells reconstituted with transcriptionally inactive STAT3 (DBD) or empty vector (EV). (F) Fold change in DKO cell number for shVEC and shSTAT3 cells expressing DBD or EV. Fold change was calculated by dividing the IL-3 readdition cell number by the IL-3-deprived cell number. Panels (B) and (D)–(F) show average ± SD (n = 3, one-way ANOVA plus a Dunnet post-test; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001). Cell Reports 2017 19, 910-918DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.012) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Loss in Cell Growth and Proliferation by shSTAT3 or shCS Can Be Rescued by Exogenous Citrate (A) Change in cell size from 6 to 24 hr in shVEC and shSTAT3 cells, with (+) or without (−) exogenous sodium citrate and SB 204990, at the time of IL-3 readdition. (B) Fold change in DKO cell number after IL-3 readdition in shVEC and shSTAT3 cells, with or without sodium citrate and SB 204990, at the time of IL-3 readdition. Fold change was calculated by dividing the IL-3 readdition cell number by the IL-3-deprived cell number. (C) Change in cell size from 6 to 24 hr in shVEC and shCS cells as described in (A). (D) Fold change in DKO cell number after IL-3 readdition in shVEC and shCS cells as described in (B). Panels (A)–(D) show average ± SD (n = 3, one-way ANOVA plus a Tukey’s post-test; ∗p < 0.05). Cell Reports 2017 19, 910-918DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.012) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions