Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achievement Analyses – Matched Cohort Groups Oklahoma A+ Schools® vs. Randomly Matched OKCPS Students  OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS  PLANNING, RESEARCH,
Advertisements

Confidence Intervals, Effect Size and Power
Stats 95.
A few of the Achievement Outcomes for San Francisco Unified School District’s California Math and Science Partnership Grant- Working together to Improve.
Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
Sex Differences in Math Test Performance What Do They Mean? Caitilyn Allen Professor of Plant Pathology and Women’s Studies U. Wisconsin-Madison.
PAT Results Huntington Hills School. Grade 3 Language Arts.
Assessment Results Presented by: Anthony Scotto Director of Curriculum and Instruction January 17, 2012.
1 NCES and NIEA Web Session July Today’s Native American Student American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students make up about 1 percent of 4th-
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grade 1 By Gender MalesFemales Grade Level Scale Score 550.
Weak positive correlation Weak negative correlation Strong positive correlation Strong negative correlation Q. Describe the correlation.
Mathematics Initiative Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction 2006 Mathematics WASL Released Items for Grades 3–8 December 6, 2006 Slide
Summary of 2006 MAP Results for the Joplin R-VIII School District Dr. Jim Simpson, Superintendent Press Conference September 1, 2006 Joplin High School.
Patterns of Teacher Professional Development in Florida Florida Joint Center for Citizenship October, 2008.
Dr. Michael Duffy, Iowa State University Extension Economist Iowa Land Value Survey 2014.
MARCH & APRIL 2012 TEST ADMINISTRATIVE ERRORS. LPSS TESTING JUST LIKE LPSS TURNAROUND WE ARE GOOD IN SOME SPOTS…NOT SO GOOD IN OTHERS… WE ARE WORKING.
6 th Grade Student-led Conferences October 8 & 9, 2013.
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
The Practice of Statistics Third Edition Chapter 1: Exploring Data 1.2 Describing Distributions with Numbers Copyright © 2008 by W. H. Freeman & Company.
English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.
Average National Arabic Scale Scores for Grades 1, 2 and 3 by School Type Grade Level Scale Score Grade Level Scale.
Boys do better at state exams The analysis of Polish national representative sample of teenagers Grazyna Wieczorkowska-Wierzbinska Malgorzata Siarkiewicz.
2008 CRCT Domain Summary Beecher Hills Elementary School Numbers Represent the Average % Correct in Each Domain SRT-1.
Slide 1 1. Profile Summary Report: Presentation Packet 2. Item Response Summary Report 3. Profile Summary Report Three reports to analyze student performance.
NJASK Comparison Scores to Essex Fells, J Districts, & Statewide (Slides 2-9) Tracking NJASK Scores for 3 rd, 4 th,& 5 th Grades (Slides ) Tracking.
Provincial Assessment Results Anglophone West School District November 26, 2015.
Grades 3-8 Assessment Results. English Language Arts.
KS2 SATs Maths Arithmetic One test paper Length: 30 minutes Marks: 40 Mathematical Reasoning Two test papers Length: 40 minutes per paper Marks:
PERCENT OF STUDENTS IN PERFORMANCE LEVELS NEW YORK STATE MATH Students in Performance Levels GRADE % +5.6% +0.2% +14.7% + 1.4% (All.
TRANSITION OF PA’S ASSESSMENT SYSTEM: IMPACT ON PVAAS?
3.3 More about Contingency Tables Does the explanatory variable really seem to impact the response variable? Is it a strong or weak impact?
WASHINGTON Atlas - Page 60 North (top) – 50N South (bottom) – 45N.
Algeria (forthcoming) Some examples for the PER course.
Gender differences in reading from a cross-cultural perspective- the contribution of gender equality David Reilly, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith.
Provincial Assessment Results
Millbrae Elementary School District
PARCC Results Summary Report.
WCS Class of 2011 SAT / ACT Results
GRADE 9 AT WYNBERG GIRLS’ HIGH SCHOOL
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Governors’ Update RaiseOnline & Fischer Family Trust
What is Value Added?.
The Chi-Squared Test Learning outcomes
Huntsville City Schools Class of 2016
76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income
Statistics PSY302 Quiz Chapters 16 & 17
WALT: UNDERSTAND WORDS AND PHRASES FOR WEATHER IN FRENCH
2015 End of Course Examinations
Preliminary Analysis of EOG/EVOS Data – Greene County 2009,2010,2011
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
CAAP Fall Report On Freshmen/Sophomores
Embargoed Official 2018 MCAS Results
X-STANDARD MATHEMATICS ONE MARK QUESTIONS
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Testing Updates February 19, 2013
Roybal LC School-wide Data.
Academic Achievement and Physical Fitness
Descriptive Statistics
Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October 2014.
Summary Sheet Figures and Maps
Summary Sheet Figures and Maps
Statistics PSY302 Quiz Chapters 16 & 17
Student Center A South: Inaccessible Element
LOCATION.
Summary Sheet Figures and Maps
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Ministry of Education and Human Resource Development Official Release of the Results of the 2019 GRADE 6 NATIONAL ASSESSMENTS

2019 GRADE 6 NATIONAL ASSESSMENT Results summary

ENTRY Sex E N S W Total Girls 48 98 65 230 441 Boys 49 88 58 199 394 Grand Total 97 186 123 429 835 Largest entry is from the western district which has some 45% of the total entry

Error Checking?

Error Spotting! 1364FCDDBCABACACBADDABBCBDDDCBADBADCDADBCDACAADBCBDCCCDBACDBAACAD *MADBACBABCCBBAACACBBBABACBABCDAACBCBDDACBCBBDCDBADDDCBBCAADCB*** 1362MCDDDCBABCDACBDAABBDBABACBCBBDAACABBDDACBCBBCABADDCADBCDADCAC 1363MADBACBABCCBBAACACBBBABACBABCDAACBCBDDACBCBBDCDBADDDCBBCAADCB

Mean raw score by gender 2019 LA 1 LA 2 M SS SC No. Girls 40.01 26.72 37.57 29.43 31.53 441 Boys 36.42 23.86 35.9 27.08 30.22 394 All 38.31 25.37 36.78 28.32 30.91 835 2018 There are significant gender differences. These are most marked in language arts and mathematics - (2014) 41.65, 25.93, 39.25, 36.94, 36.41 LA 1 LA 2 M SS SC Girls 40.47 26.82 39.05 31.09 33.5 Boys 36.02 23.99 36.68 29.07 31.99 All 38.2 25.38 37.84 30.06 32.73 No. 459 478 937

Mean raw score by district 2019   LA1/60 LA2/40 MATH/60 SOC/50 SCI/50 East 35.05 26.28* 33.18 25.15 29 North 39.35* 25.22 36.55 28.61 31.52 South 35.7* 22.98* 34.6 25.69 29.58 West 39.35 25.91 38.32 29.67 31.47 All 38.31 25.37 36.78 28.32 30.91 2018 Performance is the western district is, on average, superior to those of the other districts.   LA1/60 LA2/40 MATH/60 SOC/50 SCI/50 East 36.5 25.28 36.66 28.66 31.39 North 37.18 25.41 37.81 29.53 32.49 South 34.83 22.82 34.94 28.1 31.28 West 40.46 26.35 39.28 31.46 33.77 All 38.2 25.38 37.84 30.06 32.73

Maths distribution of grades C D E Girls 48 103 175 76 39 Boys 28 96 149 73 All 199 324 87 Girls Continue to outperform boys in every area Girls Continue to outperform boys in every area

Distribution of Math Scores Scores Math are positively skewed, with relatively small numbers of students obtaining low scores

LA distribution of grades C D E Number F 49 103 222 40 26 440 M 19 64 197 59 55 394 All 68 167 419 99 81 834 Gender disparities continue with More girls receiving the higher grades and more boys receiving D’s and E’s. 30% of students in LA 1 obtained A or B grades as compared to 20% getting D or E grades. Girls performed markedly better than boys on this paper.

LA Score distribution

Percent students scoring <40% 2019 LA 1 LA 2 M Sc SS Girls 6.5 6.3 13.8 12.7 10.2 Boys 13.7 18 21.5 11.7 All 9.9 9.3 15.9 16.9 10.9 Generally around 5% of girls (less than 30 nationally) had very low scores, as compared to 15-20% of boys.

Graphic showing percent of students with weak performance

Graphic showing percent of students with strong performance

Relationship of school performance with school size School size does not have impact on performance!

Relationship of school performance with school size Results again show that there is no direct relationship between school size Some small schools outperformed some of the larger schools Likewise, some large schools outperform some of the smaller schools.

Top performing schools 2019 Total Std. No. PioneerPreparatorySchool 453.7 10 LighthouseChristianAcademy 440.3 2 PenvillePrimary 436.1 8 ChristianUnionPrimary 435.6 12 DelicesPrimaryschool 434.5 ConventPreparatory 432.4 48 WarnerPrimary 429.6 3 BereanChristianAcademy 429.1 5 DublancPrimary 427.5 4 St.MartinPrimary 423.6 90 BellesPrimary 421.5 7