Establishing HTA Impact Evaluation From Day One Ruth Louise Poole

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practical resource Evidence based – developed through our research study Draws on the framework of impact, practicalities of capturing impact & lessons.
Advertisements

Carrol Gamble Jenny Newman Heather Bagley Bec Hanley.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
IPA Funds Monitoring and Evaluation December Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Addis Ababa, 8-10 May, 2012 Communication and social learning: supporting local decision making on climate change, agriculture and food security.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Best Practice in End of Life Care:
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage the IT Portfolio World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Implementing Clinical Governance COMPASS Consultant Outcome Indicators Programme.
Developing classroom practice to raise standards Rosemarie Sadler, Primary Performance Adviser Val Phillips – Primary Performance Adviser.
New Economy Breakfast Seminar – 13 July What Has Changed?
Overview of Intervention Mapping
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Project monitoring and evaluation
Knowledge Transfer Partnership Project Nottingham Trent University and Nottinghamshire County Council Dr Adam Barnard Rachel Clark Catherine Goodall 19/4/16.
Proctor’s Implementation Outcomes
Part 1 Being professional
The Five Secrets of Project Scheduling A PMO Approach
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
Project Management and Monitoring & Evaluation
Maternity and Neonatal, Skin, Vision and Hearing Deep Dive Workshop Understanding “what to change” using the NHS Right Care methodology Part of the NEW.
MUHC Innovation Model.
Cancer Optimal Service Design Workshop Defining “what to change” using the NHS Right Care methodology Part of the NEW Devon Way.
Public Health England – Our progress under the Sendai Framework
Primary health care performance measurement initiatives across three Canadian provinces Martin-Misener, R., Johnston, S., Burge, F., Blackman, S., Scott,
Mallee Child and Youth Area Partnership Forum 9th September 2015
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Advances in Aligning Performance Data and Budget Information:
Outcome Harvesting nitty- gritty Promise and Pitfalls of Participatory Design Atlanta, 10:45–11:30 29 October, 2016.
Research Program Strategic Plan
MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Joint session with IHP+ introduction
RCSLT Outcomes Project RCSLT Wales Hub Day 28th February 2018
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Establishing an All Wales Social Prescribing Research Network
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Optimizing MFSP: Performance Measures
Neurological Services Deep Dive Workshop Understanding “what to change” using the NHS Right Care methodology Part of the NEW Devon Way.
PROCESSES AND INDICATORS FOR MEASURING THE IMPACT OF EQUALITY BODIES
Dr Peter Groves MD FRCP Consultant Cardiologist
Core Competencies of a World Class Customer Advisory Board
Nutrition Cluster Advocacy
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
Plan your journey.
Key Building Blocks Evaluating Community Coalitions & Partnerships
Consultation and Engagement
01/05/2019 Consultancy Business Intelligence Insight and Analysis CoP Specialty Skills 1.
Guidelines on the Mid-term Evaluation
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Evaluation use in practice
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK Description: A systematic methodology was developed in order to create the.
Prioritizing Introduction of Radiotherapy Procedures
Developing a Celtic Connections Regional HTA Alliance
Social Inclusion and Community Activation Programme (SICAP)
Assessment (SOLAR).
Root Cause Analysis Identifying critical campaign challenges and diagnosing bottlenecks.
Presentation transcript:

Establishing HTA Impact Evaluation From Day One Ruth Louise Poole Establishing HTA Impact Evaluation From Day One Ruth Louise Poole*, Sophie Hughes, Lauren Elston, Matthew Prettyjohns, Susan Myles Health Technology Wales, Velindre University NHS Trust, Wales, UK Introduction Health Technology Wales (HTW) was formally established in 2017 as a new national Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agency. Our remit is to provide a strategic, streamlined approach to the identification, appraisal and adoption of non-medicines technologies (NMT) throughout Wales, UK. From the beginning, we planned to develop methods for monitoring and recording our impact across these three key areas in consultation with stakeholders. Methods Matter of Focus, external experts in Contribution Analysis methods, facilitated sessions and interviews with various stakeholders. This exercise generated a series of logic models aligned with HTW’s objectives, taking into consideration anticipated risks and assumptions. Members of the main HTW committees (Assessment Group and Appraisal Panel) were involved, as well as core HTW staff and Welsh Government commissioners. The resulting HTW Evaluation Plan has been widely disseminated, with further input being sought from additional stakeholders, including patient and public representatives. Evidence collection activities are ongoing, and summary data are being regularly uploaded to a bespoke online repository (www.outnav.net). An Evaluation Steering Group has been set up to oversee this work. Results Having theoretical frameworks in place from day one has helped to target our evidence collection activities. Our data collection tools generate evidence to validate HTW’s impact in the specific areas of interest identified. HTW staff are conscious of the need to routinely record supporting information. This systematic, prospective evidence collection facilitates the timely production of reports (such as annual reports and impact statements). Conclusions This theory-based, co-ordinated approach is helping HTW to demonstrate the value offered by our HTA activities. As a dynamic, ‘living’ framework, our outcome maps will continue to be iteratively refined, adapted and used beyond 2020. Conclusions: This novel evaluation approach prioritises technologies with potential for positive impact for patients and health services. It is anticipated that involving local clinicians in decision-making will also facilitate adoption. If these prioritisation methods prove successful, HTW will co-ordinate similar exercises for other specialties, and develop methodological resources for widespread use. Figure 1. An example of an outcome map for our evidence appraisal activities. Each ‘stepping stone’ is associated with one or more success criteria, and evaluated using pre-specified sources of evidence (such as surveys, reports, minutes or social media feedback). Colour coding and shading is used to track progress, showing ‘at a glance’ where our impact evidence gaps could be strengthened. www.healthtechnology.wales info@healthtechnology.wales @HealthTechWales Health Technology Wales is funded by, but independent of, Welsh Government