Beam Stability of the LHC Beam Transfer Line TI 8

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHC Collimation Working Group – 19 December 2011 Modeling and Simulation of Beam Losses during Collimator Alignment (Preliminary Work) G. Valentino With.
Advertisements

Spontaneous Radiation at LCLS Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04 Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04.
Sat/Sun 26/27 th March Sat 18h20: Stable beams. Fill #1653. Sun 10h02: Stable beams continued. vdM scans. Length calibrations. 16h59: Beam dump. Delivered.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Beam Instrumentations: Requirements for Proton and Electron Beams C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements:
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML R. Apsimon, A. Latina.
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
#1 Energy matching It is observed that the orbit of an injected proton beam is horizontally displaced towards the outside of the ring, by about  x~1 mm.
C. Fischer – LHC Instrumentation Review – 19-20/11/2001 Gas Monitors for Transverse Distribution Studies in the LHC LHC Instrumentation Review Workshop.
F AAC Review, May 10, Prebys 1 Answer to Question  What is the analysis backing up the claim that the losses will be reduced with the new corrector.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
… Work in progress at CTF3 … Davide Gamba 01 July 2013 Study and Implementation of L INEAR F EEDBACK T OOLS for machine study and operation.
Beam Based Optics Measurements CTF3 Collaboration meeting CERN Yu-Chiu Chao, TJNAF.
06:00 – Ongoing injection problems on beam 2  07:42 – Start of injection investigations  11:11 – Injection problem fixed. Resteering of transfer line.
Injection status W. Bartmann, C. Bracco, B. Goddard, V. Kain, A. Macpherson, M. Meddahi, S. Redaelli, J. Uythoven, J. Wenninger LIBD Meeting, 20 th Sept.
Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.
Progress with Beam Report to LMC, Machine Coordination W10: Mike Lamont – Ralph Assmann Thanks to other machine coordinators, EIC’s, operators,
STABILITY STUDIES OF THE PSB-TO-PS TRANSFER W. Bartmann, J. Abelleira With many inputs from: O. Berrig, J. Borburgh, S. Gilardoni, GP di Giovanni, B. Goddard,
1 TI 8 LHC SPS LSS6 IR2 TT41 LSS4 IR8 TI 2 TT60 TT40TT20 LSS2 LSS1 TT10 Mobile dump block (TED) Targets T2, T4, T6 Target T40.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
After Protons from RCS 1 st DeeMe Collaboration Meeting Dec. 10, 2012 Kazami Yamamoto J-PARC Center Accelerator Division.
Simulation of Extinction Channel Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Statistics 2015 Fixed Target CT/MTE and LHC BRIGHTNESS Eric Veyrunes, Johan Dalla-Costa, Diego Perez.
HiRadMat Summary of Phase-I and plans for Phase-II commissioning J. Blanco, N. Conan, V. Kain, K. Cornelis, B. Goddard, C. Hessler, M. Meddahi, C. Theis,
HiRadMat Primary Beam Overview C. Hessler, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi On behalf of the HiRadMat Primary beam line working group HiRadMat Project Review
V. Kain AB/OP1Chamonix XV What is required to safely fill the LHC? V.Kain AB/OP Input from: B.Goddard, M.Jonker, Y.Kadi, R.Losito, V.Mertens, B.Puccio,
Threading / LTC/ JW1 How difficult is threading at the LHC ? When MADX meets the control system … J. Wenninger AB-OP &
Aperture measurements during LHC commissioning 2017
The TV Beam Observation system - BTV
1st LHC MD Period Started
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
Transfer line test: Beam stability measurements
Emittance growth AT PS injection
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Results of the LHC Prototype Chromaticity Measurement
Beam-beam Effects in Hadron Colliders
Monday h00: Ramp 10 A/s (chromaticity, crossing angle non-closure, beta-beating): At 7m and 3.5m, put in one by one crossing angles, calculated.
Safe Injection into the LHC V.Kain AB/CO
CNGS Proton Beam: Introduction
Application of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to Beam Diagnosis
Real-time orbit the LHC
Thursday morning – optics correction
Machine studies during beam commissioning
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2010
Tuesday 23/11/10 8:00 Physics fill #1511 dumped
LHC Injection and Dump Protection
Lost at 12:05 to power converter (RTQX2.R1) problem
Limits on damping times
J. Uythoven, W. Venturini Delsolaro, CERN, Geneva
Saturday 2/4/ :00-09:00 Problems with SPS:
CNGS Proton beam line: news since NBI2002 OUTLINE 1. Overview
Monday February 28th 8h00: Injection
Thursday :00: Physics fill from the night shift
Energy Calibration of the SPS with Proton and Lead Ion Beams
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
Monday 24 October hours of 25ns MD
Orbit response measurements and analysis
Thursday 04/11 - Morning Access until ~13:00 Pre-cycle Proton checks:
Collimators: Operations - Baseline Assumptions
Machine protection and closed orbit
CNGS Primary Beam Results 2011
TI8 analysis / J. Wenninger
Plan for 1 m b* J. Uythoven & J. Wenninger
Wednesday 6th April Injection of 50 ns up to 108 bunches (3 x 36).
Operational Results of LHC Collimator Alignment using Machine Learning
Main Linac Beam Optics and Tolerances
Daniel, Gianluca and Belen (for the Collimator team)
What systems request a beam dump? And when do we need them?
Presentation transcript:

Beam Stability of the LHC Beam Transfer Line TI 8   J. Wenninger, B. Goddard, V. Kain, J. Uythoven (CERN, Geneva) Introduction n target n beam to Gran Sasso SPS TI 8 TI 2 TI 8, the first 2.7 km long transfer line between the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS) and the LHC was commissioned in the fall of 2004. The stability of the line is critical for injection into the LHC, since it affects emittance growth, beam loss in the LHC injection regions and setup time of the lines. The maximum injection error tolerated in the LHC corresponds to 1.5 × sbeam. Stability studies were limited by the beam intensity that could be used during this commissioning phase, which had to be kept low in order to limit activation of the beam dump installed on the downstream end of the line which is close to the LHC tunnel.. Model Independent Analysis Model Independent Analysis is based on a spacial-temporal analysis via Singular Value Decomposition of a matrix A holding the data history This technique was applied to trajectory data collected over 6 hours of stable beam conditions. Due to limitations on the intensity, the single short resolution of the BPM readings was only 200 mm. A visual inspection of the trajectories did not reveal any sign of drift. Applying MIA to the trajectory sample yields the following eigenvalue spectrum : The associated spacial vector / trajectory is consistent with a trajectory originating at the extraction septum In graphical form: r.m.s. amplitude Coherent signal A U V W noise… The r.m.s. amplitude gives the beam position jitter from shot to shot. It corresponds to an amplitude of sbeam/8. The observed amplitude is consistent with the measured ripple of the extraction septum power converter. Matrix V contains the orbit pattern associated to each eigenvalue wi ,while the column vectors of matrix U describe the time evolution of the corresponding trajectory pattern. There is one eigenvalue that is well above the baseline level corresponding to the noise. Collimator alignment During the TI 8 commissioning a beam alignment method for collimators was tested with a LHC Carbon collimator located in the upstream part of the transfer line. Since this alignment method is sensitive to shot-by-shot beam position jitter, it was used to evaluate the stability of the beam in the transfer line. The experiment Principle A collimator jaw is moved into the beam to scrape off a significant fraction of the beam. The intensity fluctuations at the downstream end of the line, normalized to the intensity in the SPS ring, reflect the position and size jitter of the beam from one shot to the next. From the knowledge of the BCT resolution it is possible to extract the intensity fluctuation due to the beam position jitter at the collimator. Phase 1 : collimator fully open - determine BCT resolution  5% SPS BCT Phase 2 : one collimator jaw closed - measure BCT fluctuations  11% - scaled BCT resolution  8% - determine contribution from beam jitter  8% Collimator TI8 Assuming Gaussian bunch profiles, the shot to shot beam position jitter is less than sbeam/10. Collimator BCT BCT