Proposer: Tracey Saunders, Northern Gas Networks

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy24 limited Modification Proposal 0502: Amendment to Gas Quality NTS Entry Specification at the px Teesside System Entry Point.
Advertisements

Review of industry code governance 26 March 2010.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21 st August A: Mod Title: Inclusion of as a valid UNC communication.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May : EU Capacity Regulations – Capacity Allocation Mechanisms with Congestion Management Procedures.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Chris Shanley - National Grid NTS.
Proposer: insert Panel Date: insert 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title Guidance: These slides are meant to provide a brief overview for the UNC Panel, to introduce.
Proposer: Mark Jones, SSE Panel Date: 20 th February : Mod Title: Amendment to AQ Values Present within Annex A of the CSEP NExA AQ Table Following.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Workplan Version 0.2 Draft.
Proposer: Hayley Burden Panel Date: 17th April : Mod Title: Imbalance Charge amendments required to align the UNC with the Network Code on Gas.
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 15 th May 0501: Treatment of Existing Entry Capacity Rights at the Bacton ASEP to comply with EU Capacity Regulations.
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals Beverley Viney - National Grid NTS.
Mod Proposal Prevention of "Timing Out" of Authority decisions on Modification Proposals Nick Reeves.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Legal Text Production Options for Discussion. Legal Text Production 2 Issues with current approach Issues with the current approach to legal text production.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 19 November 2010.
Distribution workstream 29th January 2009
Transmission Workstream February 2009
Proposer: Matthew Hatch Panel Date: 20/10/16
Modifications iGT 039 and GT 0440 re iGT Agency Services background
Distribution Workgroup 24/11/16
EU Implementation Programme
Manifest Errors for Entry Capacity Overruns Workgroup 364
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
PROPOSAL WRITING TECH COM 1.
CAP190: Workgroup Report CUSC Modifications Panel, 26th August 2011
Proposer: BP Gas Marketing Ltd Panel Date: 17 April 2014
Proposer: National Grid NTS Panel Date: 17th April 2014
Electricity Governance Comparison
Supplement XXX Title of the supplement DICOM Working group
Code Governance Review UNC Modification Proposals
UNC Modification – Non Effective Days
NTS Entry Charging Review Update
CSS Update for CoMC 19th September 2018
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
7th July 2011 Transmission Workgroup - Elexon
UNC 0XXX: Mod Title: insert title
Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 16th January 2014
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
Chris Warner UNC Modification Panel 21 December 2017
Modification 0333A – implementation info
0350 – Combining the NTS entry capacity and exit capacity credit checks Chris Shanley.
Rebecca Hailes For 15 March 2018
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
Transmission Workgroup 6th March 2014
Proposer: Marie Clark, ScottishPower Panel Date: 7 February 2014
Project Nexus Workgroup
Long Term Non Firm Capacity Update
Modification Proposal 0474: Inclusion of the guidelines relating to the “Customer Settlement Error Claims Process” within UNC governance.
Interruptible to Firm – NTS Supply Point Transition
UNC 0621L: Amendments to Gas Transmission Charging Regime
5 September 2012 Joanna Ferguson
Market Participant Identity Process – migration to UNC
Richard Fairholme Transmission Workstream 4th September 2008
CUSC “Alternate” Proposal process
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
Deferral of Retrospective Updates Functionality
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Energy Solutions Ltd
Nexus Workgroup Mod 0473 Presentation
DSC ChMC CSS update 12th September 2018
Title slide [from Title Slide master]
Performance Assurance Framework (‘PAF’):
Implementation Approach Distribution Workgroup – June 2014
Key Impacts Modification Proposals Legal Text Modification Reports.
Supplement XXX Title of the supplement DICOM Working group
Enabling Large Scale Utilisation of Class 3
Proposer: Steve Mulinganie, Gazprom Energy Panel Date: 20th June 2019
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
Xoserve Draft UIG Incentives Modifications 20 May 2019
Presentation transcript:

UNC 0XXX: Mod Title: Re-ordering of the UNC in advance of Faster Switching Proposer: Tracey Saunders, Northern Gas Networks Panel Date: 19th September 2019

Why change? Faster Switching ‘on the shelf’ Legal text has Please use bullets to summarise what in the UNC is wrong and creating problems Faster Switching ‘on the shelf’ Legal text has New/amended/removed obligations (not part of this proposal) A reordering of the existing legal text Reordering benefits: Identify where there are going to be changes in obligations as part of Faster Switching. Maintain the ‘on the shelf’ version Less changes ‘all at once’ with Faster Switching text Identify where new modification proposals impact the SCR Identify if any errors occurred during the re-ordering

Options Please use bullets to summarise what options have been considered to fix the identified problem. Is a UNC modification the only route? Leave text as is and allow all changes to be implemented when the Faster Switching comes into effect Change the current UNC to match the re-ordered version (pre CSS amendments)

Solution Please use bullets to briefly outline the solution contained within the modification. To re-order the UNC to match the re-ordering carried out as part of the Faster Switching UNC Legal text Overlay the re-ordered text with modifications that have been implemented since the re-ordering exercise occurred

Recommended Steps The Proposer recommends that this modification should be: Not subject to self-governance because it is materially changing the order of the UNC. This reordering has an impact on the SCR Workgroup assessment to develop the modification for 3 months