Dr. Timothy Vansickle, QAI

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.

Advertisements

Welcome to Smarter Balanced Math Assessment Claims EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER - NORTH LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Spring 2014 Facilitator Name.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Smarter Balanced Assessment Update California Mathematics.

Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.

Accessibility and Accommodations Positive and productive assessment experience Results that are fair and accurate.

Kimberly Brunswick Donna McCaw. Race to the Top Assessment Competition  Two consortia ◦ SMARTER/Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) ◦ Partnership.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.

ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #8 Assessment.

The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.

1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.

Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.

Common Core State Standards: Changing the Game Lucille E. Davy, Senior Advisor June 27, 2011.

NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Assessment Update California Mathematics Council.

Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.

PARCC Update June 6, PARCC Update Today’s Presentation:  PARCC Field Test  Lessons Learned from the Field Test  PARCC Resources 2.

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.

Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.

Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress.

Minnesota Assessment System Overview Jennifer Dugan Director, Statewide Testing 6/18/15 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every.

Smarter Balanced and Accountability Assessment and Accountability Evolution and Implications.

CCSS Assessments Presenter: Dr. Cindy Thomas. Session Objectives: Who developed the new CCSS assessment? What types of questions are on the math assessment?

M-STEP A presentation for Macomb County Math Teachers.

Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.

Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.

Transitioning to a Balanced Assessment System. Overview Professional Development in Assessment Smarter Balanced Logistics.

Smarter Balanced Field Test March 3, 2014 Sequim School District.

Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.

Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.

Computer-based Assessment Paul Horwitz The Concord Consortium Presentation to DR-K12 PI Meeting, November 10, 2009.

Study of Device Comparability within the PARCC Field Test.

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.

Getting Ready for Smarter Balanced Jan Martin Assessment Director, SD DOE Feb. 7, 2014.

Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.

MTSS PRESENTATION SEPTEMBER, 2013 NCSC Summative Assessment Update.

SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium Technology Update State Superintendent’s Education Data Advisory Committee April 7,

Smarter Balanced Fengyi Hung, Ph.D. Assessment Director Angie Neville Elementary Assistant Director Marie Verhaar Assistant Supt. Teaching and Learning.

Two Visuals depicting Balanced Assessment Systems Shared with MI School Improvement Facilitators Network 3/19/2013.

The New Illinois Learning Standards & Assessments: What Parents Need to Know Brian Minsker President-Elect

Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.

Advanced Classroom Technology State funding for implementing technology Professional development for 21 st Century Classrooms One-to-One Mobile Devices.

Information for the Presenter Suggested Schedule: 8:00-8:30 Frame and Overview 8:30-9:00 Smarter Balanced Assessments 9:00-10:00 A Closer Look at Items.

Information for the Presenter Suggested Schedule: 8:00-8:30 Frame and Overview 8:30-9:00 Smarter Balanced Assessments 9:00-10:00 A Closer Look at Items.

Measuring the Power of Learning.™ 2015–16 CAASPP March, 2016 Laurie Carlson California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)

This resource sponsored by Intel Education Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others

What about the Assessment System?

Irvington Public Schools: PARCC INFORMATION

Evaluating Educationally Significant Outcomes: The Need to Balance Academic Achievement with Social-Emotional Learning Dr. Tiffany Berry Research Associate.

3rd – 5th Grade Gregory Drive Elementary

MENTEP, Brussels Janet Looney

Assessment Information

Host: Central Michigan University February 3, 2017

Utilizing the ELA Results

An Introduction to the “Big Picture”

INCLUDE Strategy A plan for accommodating

Usability Research: Lessons Learned For Digital Assessment Delivery Cathy Wendler Educational Testing Service June 21, 2013.

Session 6, Writing Performance Task Preparation Guide, Part 2

…the major changes in a nutshell

PARCC Assessments Overview

Maureen Capone, RDH, MS Farmingdale State College

Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)

New Assessments and Accommodations

What’s Up, What’s Down and What’s Next in Connecticut

Presentation transcript:

Dr. Timothy Vansickle, QAI We Teach How We Test: How Technology Enhanced Assessments Are Changing the Face of Instruction Ms. Jane Miller, QAI dr. Les SewAll, QAI Ms. Jennifer Dugan, MDE Dr. Timothy Vansickle, QAI

Overview The concept and meaning of “form follows function” Examples of this concept in education Technology enhanced items as a possible model Implications of new accessibility standards, e.g., APIP Implications for teaching, learning, assessment, technology, and psychometrics

Form and Function Assessment activities = classroom activities Writing prompts  Writing practice Performance events  Scenario-based assignments and problem-based learning Evidence-based responses  Research-based learning Computer adaptive testing  Computer adaptive learning Digital testing environments  Digital learning environments

Technology = More Technology Technology = Technology Enhanced Items (TEIs) and more Interactions that involve decision making and higher levels of cognitive processing New environments and tools Appropriate for the age and population Facilitate teaching, learning, and assessing

TEI as a Model Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced) Templates Partnership for Assessing Readiness for College and Career (PARCC) Item Types Enhanced Assessment System (EAS) Interactions

TEIs as a Model Minnesota Science Test Science simulations on statewide assessments Consistent with classroom experiences

MN Science Sample Item

Technology Standards Online (assessment) tools Assistive devices APIP Making “accommodations” obsolete

Implications for Teaching and Testing Is a new and novel test item valid if students are not taught in that manner? How does teaching change to accommodate the technology that may be used in testing? What psychometric challenges appear due to these new technologically enhanced tests? How are the items scored? What measurement model(s) apply?

Challenges and Opportunities Variety of interactions, platforms, and tools Tablets, iPads, programs Commonalities that we might teach to 3 T’s – Teacher Technology Training Resources come from the oddest sources … Cost and accessibility Build partnerships