Power Leads for Test Stands

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cooling System Get the engine up to optimum operating Temperature as quickly as possible and maintains it at that temperature. Controls the heat produced.
Advertisements

Basic Refrigeration Cycle
The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction
Interim Design Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon Team 16.
Cryogenic Experts Meeting (19 ~ ) Helium distribution system for Super-FRS dipoles and multiplets MT/FAIR – Cryogenics and Magnets Y. Xiang,
1 Spacecraft Thermal Design Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
Evaporators For Air Conditioning
Heat Pipes Heat Exchangers P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Heat Exchange through Another Natural Action….
BASIC CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGN  The aim of the design is to completely obtain the dimensions of all the parts of the machine to furnish the data to the.
Chapter 2 Transformers.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Electromagnetic Induction
Heating Systems.
IHEP 1.3 GHz Cryomodule and Cryogenics IHEP Cryogenic group 2nd Workshop of the IHEP 1.3 GHz SRF R&D Project Dec 2 nd, 2009.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
III.PHYSICAL PRINCIPALS - TERMINOLOGY A. Temperature and Heat 1. Temperature Intensity of Energy Units; Degrees C or F.
/18 Cryogenic thermometry for refrigerant distribution system of JT-60SA Kyohei NATSUME, Haruyuki MURAKAMI, Kaname KIZU, Kiyoshi YOSHIDA, Yoshihiko KOIDE.
Spectrometer Solenoid: Plans to Fix Magnet 2 Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.
Review-LHC Interaction Regions - Upgrade Phase I Amalia Ballarino, 31 st July 2008 Cold Powering Options Conceptual Design Review of the LHC Interaction.
19./20. September 2007 Current leads for FAIR Cryogenic Expert Meeting 19./20. September 2007 Birgit Weckenmann.
Accelerator Design: the nuts and bolts…and gaskets and resistors Elvin Harms Beams Division/Fermilab
Real Accelerators: a facility overview the nuts and bolts…and gaskets and resistors United States Particle Accelerator School – Accelerator Fundamentals.
5 th Joint Hi-Lumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting 2015 SC Link Protection A.Ballarino 28/10/2015.
JRA on Development of High Temperature SC Link Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources Amalia Ballarino Esgard open meeting CERN,
1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Principle of the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Highlights of Prototype SC Magnet Tests (LCLSII- 4.5-EN-0612) and Proposed Production Magnet Test Plan (LCLSII-4.5-EN-611-R0) and XFEL Magnet Test Results.
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
A two-stage system for the future cooling system.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CEBAF Cryo & SRF Workshop April 3, 2014 Jonathan Creel Electrical / Cryogenics Engineer Cryogenics.
DESIGN, FABRICATION AND PERFORMANCE TEST OF 10 kA CURRENT LEADS FOR SST-1 Sarkar B, Sahu A. K, Panchal P, Sonara D, Bhattacharya R, Singh M, Shukla P,
RFQ coupler S. Kazakov 07/28/2015. Requirements: Coupler requirements Expected problems: Heating (loop, ceramic window, etc.) Multipactor Solutions: Appropriate.
The most likely cause of death for a superconducting magnet Input data for thermal modeling of Nb 3 Sn Superconducting Magnets by Andrew Davies Find the.
WP10 General Meeting, Giovanni Volpini, CERN 1 December 2015 Test progress INFN 1.
1 Young-Ju Lee Vacuum & Cryogenic Engineering Team National Fusion Research Institute Young-Ju Lee Vacuum & Cryogenic Engineering Team National Fusion.
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 1 ICEC 26- ICMC 2016 March 7-11, 2016, New Delhi, India Michael Nagel Cryogenic commissioning, cool down and first.
Michael A. Green and Heng Pan
R. van Weelderen and U. Wagner CERN
SIS 100 Vacuum chamber Recooler String system Components
S. Feher MICE Magnet Readiness Review RAL, June 28th, 2016
Task 5: High-Tc superconducting link Summary of work-package
Existing Prototype Test Facility (PTF) and planned Series Test Facility Schroeder, Claus Cryo-Review Darmstadt
MQXC Nb-Ti 120mm 120T/m 2m models
SIGENTICS HV Series S-modyn
HL-LHC IT STRING and Series test of SC link
Temperature Measurement
Quench Simulation at GSI
LARP Vertical Test Facility
Heat Pipe | Heat Exchanger Manufactured by Manor
Hollow e- lens, Cryogenic aspects
CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN
Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green
Top Quality Heat Pipe Heat Pipe Exchanger Launched by Maniks
Cooling System Get the engine up to optimum operating Temperature as quickly as possible and maintains it at that temperature. Controls the heat produced.
Electrical Junction Boxes in UAE | SPPE
Recirculating CO2 System
SHMS Cryogenics and Q2(Q3Dipole) Cool Down
Operation experience of cryogenic system and cryomodules for the superconducting linear accelerator at IUAC, New Delhi. T S Datta ( On behalf of Cryogenics.
COOLING OF POWER DEVICES
ILC Experimental Hall Cryogenics An Overview
High Current Direct Current (HCDC) Superconductor Cable
Cryomodules Challenges for PERLE
Quench calculations of the CBM magnet
Superconducting Magnets
Cryogenic management of the LHC Run 2 dynamic heat loads
F.Pasdeloup, H.Prin, L. Williams
J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino
Presentation transcript:

Power Leads for Test Stands S. Feher 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands June 11-12, 2019, Uppsala

Test stand requirements with respect to Power Leads Outline Overview Test stand requirements with respect to Power Leads HTS vs Convectional PL What can go wrong? Summary S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

Power leads are commercially available S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

Magnet Test Stands Requirements – Power Leads Magnet test stands primary purpose is to validate magnet designs by testing R&D, Prototype and Production magnets. Test stands should be capable of simulating operational environments and requirements for multiple designs for similar but different magnet types: Dipole, Quadrupole, Multipoles Current and future accelerators (LHC, HL-LHC, FCC etc.) Operational environment might be different (pressure, temperature range, magnetic field, voltage and electrical current rating, etc.) Power leads are part of the magnet test stand so they need to follow the same approach with respect to operational environment and providing current to different magnet designs: Current Voltage Pressure Cooling scheme - heat load at the cold end Protection S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

Current Rating and Range Test stands are designed to be able to test at least one magnet type but in mind that the stand will be used for multiple purposes. Choosing the power leads for test stands are not obvious since PLs are optimized for one operational current. Current rating can be up to 100 kA – Pipetron magnets In general low current considered up to 1-2 kA ”Regular” rating is up to 30 kA – low inductance high current Ramp rate up to 500 A/s – Eddy current issues are negligible but still need to be designed to withstand high ramp rates S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

Voltage Rating HV test of the magnets also means we are HV testing the leads Can be as high as 3 kV Leakage current is as low as < 1uA Running the power leads at different current than the designed (optimum) current value leads overcooling the upper end of the leads Condensation at the insulating surface is probably the most problematic issue with the current leads S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

Pressure Rating It is usually not an issue however sometimes in special test cases the power leads need to be robust Pressure rating can be up to 4-5 bars Insulation scheme has to be appropriate with most likely metal sealing surfaces Other extreme case is when the power leads need to operate in vacuum Conduction cooled leads – cryo-cooler is used at the cold end Bi-functional vapor cooled lead lower end is conduction cooled Testing feed boxes – pressure rating is higher Testing the power leads itself Paschen test can be challenging – p*d has the minumum S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

Cooling Scheme - Heat Load at the Cold End Optimizing the cooling consumption of the leads are not the primary goal for test stands, since they are not operating all the time; saving money is not the driving force, but cooling capacity sometimes can be an issue. Heat load at the cold end to be minimized Power leads are coming in several different cooling solutions: LHe vapor cooled leads – most common solution to minimize coolant consumption Conduction cooled leads – most useful for cryo-cooler solutions or small current applications Bifunctional leads can use different cooling type – LHe vapor, LN2 and LN2 vapor S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

Regulation and Protection Vapor cooled leads cooling depends on the operating electrical current value, even if the leads are optimized to one current value Current dependent flow rate Usual solution is a stand by current and operating current flow rate adjustment It is possible to use voltage drop as a feedback to regulate the flow rate Optimized power leads are using optimized copper cross section and length Leads can be unstable at not sufficient cooling – coolant loss case Protection is based on voltage threshold Simple fixed threshold value – maximum allowable voltage drop value for the current lead Resistance deviation based: Voltage drop value is bucked against the current (traditionally used at FNAL) S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

HTS vs Conventional Current Leads In a case the cooling capacity is limited HTS leads are excellent choice LHe liquefaction is limited Cryo-coolers are in use – low current applications Bi-functional power lead solution Upper section is a conventional vapor cooled copper lead LHe vapor – re-utilized helium gas at higher temperature 20-50 K - CERN Leads by Amalia LN2 is used at 80 - 82 K – FNAL leads; LN2 is cheap Pros Less power consumption Cons HTS needs special protection scheme 1 mV threshold value S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

What Can Go Wrong? HV withstand test is compromised by power leads Overcooled uppers section – wet insulation, high leakage current Multiple solutions to prevent it: Dry nitrogen cover Active temperature control Passive thermal insulation Special coating to prevent moisture to be absorbed into the current leads Special power lead design that is not sensitive to excessive cold gas trough the lead Copper flag joint compromised and too much heat generated at the upper end Lower joint is compromised and too much heat transferred to the liquid Improper protection and lead burn out HTS proper protection 1 mV threshold value S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019

Power leads are test stand specific Summary Power leads are test stand specific Magnet specifications will influence choosing the leads Vapor cooled leads are common but conduction cooled leads are also used for test stands with low current < 2000 A Bi-functional HTS leads are not common for test stands but occasionally are used if cooling capacity is limited to save liquid or cryo-coolers are used Magnet HV withstand tests can be limited by improper power leads insulation scheme S. Feher | 3rd International Workshop on Superconducting Magnet Test Stands 6/11/2019