Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Journal of Vision. 2011;11(10):16. doi: / Figure Legend:
Advertisements

Visual Influences on Echo Suppression
Victoria F. Ratcliffe, David Reby  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009)
Jennifer Wathan, Karen McComb  Current Biology 
Natalia Zaretskaya, Andreas Bartels  Current Biology 
Pre-constancy Vision in Infants
Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends
Phantom Tactile Sensations Modulated by Body Position
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
African Elephants Can Use Human Pointing Cues to Find Hidden Food
Kinesthetic information disambiguates visual motion signals
Lexical Influences on Auditory Streaming
Mental Imagery Changes Multisensory Perception
Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M. Vickery  Current Biology 
Colin J. Palmer, Colin W.G. Clifford  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Sensorimotor Learning Configures the Human Mirror System
Fertilization: Monogamy by Mutually Assured Destruction
Transforming the Thermal Grill Effect by Crossing the Fingers
Deciphering Cortical Number Coding from Human Brain Activity Patterns
A Mechanistic Link from GABA to Cortical Architecture and Perception
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces
A Dedicated Binding Mechanism for the Visual Control of Movement
Patrick Haggard, Gian Domenico Iannetti, Matthew R. Longo 
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages e7 (September 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Martin Eimer, Anna Grubert  Current Biology 
A Mechanistic Link from GABA to Cortical Architecture and Perception
Eye Position Affects Orienting of Visuospatial Attention
Neural Entrainment to Speech Modulates Speech Intelligibility
Jennifer Wathan, Karen McComb  Current Biology 
Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision
A Fovea for Pain at the Fingertips
Perception Matches Selectivity in the Human Anterior Color Center
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Feeling numbness for someone else's finger
Variance After-Effects Distort Risk Perception in Humans
Jannath Begum Ali, Charles Spence, Andrew J. Bremner  Current Biology 
Dissociable Effects of Salience on Attention and Goal-Directed Action
Active Interpersonal Touch Gives Rise to the Social Softness Illusion
Motor Skills Are Strengthened through Reconsolidation
Computer Use Changes Generalization of Movement Learning
Early Vision Impairs Tactile Perception in the Blind
Octopus Movement: Push Right, Go Left
Silvia Convento, Md. Shoaibur Rahman, Jeffrey M. Yau  Current Biology 
Self and Other in the Human Motor System
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Self-Control in Chimpanzees Relates to General Intelligence
Role of the Cerebellum in Adaptation to Delayed Action Effects
Sound Facilitates Visual Learning
Proprioceptive Distance Cues Restore Perfect Size Constancy in Grasping, but Not Perception, When Vision Is Limited  Juan Chen, Irene Sperandio, Melvyn.
Experience-Driven Plasticity in Binocular Vision
Bodily Illusions Modulate Tactile Perception
Color Constancy for an Unseen Surface
Cooling the Thermal Grill Illusion through Self-Touch
Kazumichi Matsumiya, Satoshi Shioiri  Current Biology 
Incidental Processing of Biological Motion
Sharing Social Touch in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex
J. Andrew Pruszynski, Roland S. Johansson, J. Randall Flanagan 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
The Change in Fingertip Contact Area as a Novel Proprioceptive Cue
Memory Reactivation Enables Long-Term Prevention of Interference
Andreas Schindler, Andreas Bartels  iScience 
James N. Ingram, Ian S. Howard, J. Randall Flanagan, Daniel M. Wolpert 
Volume 28, Issue 19, Pages e8 (October 2018)
Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
Body Perception in Newborns
Responsibility Assignment in Redundant Systems
Presentation transcript:

Dynamic Displacement Vector Interacts with Tactile Localization Lucile Dupin, Patrick Haggard  Current Biology  Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 492-498.e3 (February 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032 Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Setup, Task, and Conditions of Experiment 1 (A) Overview of the experimental setup. (B) Example of one trial in the perpendicular condition of experiment 1. Each trial comprised 3 stages: a waiting foreperiod, followed by pressing on a first, and then a second, key. The movement between the first and second key is here to the right (could also be to the left). Each keypress triggers touch from one of three tactors on the wrist. The movement was therefore associated with a tactile vector (light gray) in the distal direction (could also be the proximal direction). (C) Tactile stimuli define a tactile vector. (D) Participants used a pointer to indicate the direction of a vector linking the tactile locations. Note the possibility of bias by finger displacement. (E) Arrangement of the parallel movement condition of experiment 1. Note that the displacement vector and tactile vector can be congruent or incongruent. The figure illustrates one tactile vector direction that could also be in the opposite direction. Current Biology 2019 29, 492-498.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Conditions of Experiments 2–6 (A) Positions of the tactile stimulators and the two keys in experiment 2. The same-limb condition replicates the perpendicular condition of experiment 1. Different-limbs condition: the movement is produced by the right hand, and stimulations occur on the left wrist. Finger-forehead condition: the movement is produced by the left hand, and tactile stimuli are delivered to the forehead. (B) Three movement conditions were compared in experiment 3: standard finger movement as in experiment 1, sliding movement along the table surface, and successive pressure on the two keys by two different fingers. (C) Positions of tactile stimuli and keys for the perpendicular-right and parallel-right conditions of experiment 4 were based on experiment 1, except that the movement is produced by the right hand whereas touch stimuli are delivered to the left wrist. Note that the right hand’s movement in the parallel condition of experiment 4 is similar to the left hand’s movement in the perpendicular experiment of experiment 1. (D) Positions of tactile stimuli in a V configuration and keys for experiment 5. Current Biology 2019 29, 492-498.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effect of Finger Movement Direction Experiments 1–5 (A) Grand mean and SD across participants of the perceived tactile direction angle in perpendicular conditions during displacements to the left (dark gray) or right (light gray), while making active and passive movements. The total angle α (black line) indicates the biasing effect of finger displacement on tactile direction perception. (B) Movement-induced bias in tactile vectors for the three conditions of experiment 2: same-limb, different-limbs, and finger-forehead. (C) Movement-induced bias in tactile vectors for the three conditions of experiment 3: standard movement, sliding movement, and 2-Fingers. (D) Experiment 4: effects of moving the right finger on left wrist tactile perception for the perpendicular-right movement condition. (E) Experiment 5: effects of moving the left finger on right wrist tactile perception in a V configuration. Current Biology 2019 29, 492-498.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of Finger Movement Direction in Function of the Asynchrony Delay in Experiment 6 Effects of a movement-tactile asynchrony in experiment 6, using the same setup as the experiment 1 passive movement, perpendicular condition; notice the persistence of movement-induced bias of tactile direction judgement for delays up to 600 ms. Current Biology 2019 29, 492-498.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.032) Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions