Support for Effective Schools and Districts Persistently Low-Achieving

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

Understanding Grade Level and School Growth Reports Office of Assessment and Accountability.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
Kentucky Association for Assessment Coordinators (KAAC) Office of Assessment and Accountability 10/23/12 1 Assessment and Accountability Update.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets
School Performance Framework (SPF). Purpose of SPF The School Performance Framework (SPF) is a comprehensive system to help schools focus on strengths.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
DAC Back-to-School Training Overview Presented By: Jennifer Stafford 1 OAA:DSR:js:07/22/2015.
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS STATE ACCOUNTABILITY RESULTS Multiple Measurement Rating (MMR) – Initial Designation.
NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.
School Year. Unbridled Learning Next Generation Learners (100%) Next Generation Support (23%) Next Generation Professionals (10%) Next Generation.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
Kentucky’s School Report Card and Spreadsheets 2015 Workbook.
A Balanced Approach As of September 15, 2010 Proposed Accountability Model.
 SYSTEM - an assemblage or combination of things or parts forming a complex or unitary whole  KPREP testing is one measure of our school system.
703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Minnesota’s Proposed Accountability System “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Goal: Institute an accountability model that… improves student achievement increases graduation rates closes achievement gaps Globally Competitive Students.
Erlanger-Elsmere Independent Schools Assessment Results.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Assessment and Accountability Update Longbranch Elementary School September 27,
Consolidated District and School Improvement Plans
2015 Assessment and Accountability Update Scott Trimble Workshop October 20, Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Kentucky.
John M. Stumbo Elementary Council Briefing to the Floyd County Board of Education June 27, 2016.
Assessment & Accountability Session 3: Content and School Scores.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
UNBRIDLED LEARNING: College/Career Ready for All
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
West Haven Next-Generation Accountability Report
College/Career Ready for All
State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC
TAPR Review Kohrville Elementary
System for Effectiveness and Achievement in Learning
Washington’s ESSA Consolidated Plan Implementation 101
BUTLER COUNTY MIDDLE DATA ANALYSIS
Growth Models Oklahoma
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Next Generation Learners
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness
Flemingsburg Elementary March 9, 2016
Anderson Elementary School
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
Texas State Accountability
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
HOGSETT Elementary School
College/Career Ready for All
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Spencer County Public Schools
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Kentucky’s Instructional Transformation System
Old (API State/AYP Federal) to New
English Learner Accountability Component
Domain I: Student Achievement Domain II: School Progress
Presentation transcript:

Support for Effective Schools and Districts Persistently Low-Achieving Accountability Component Scores Accountability Overall Score The Overall Score shall be a compilation of the three accountability components School/District Classifications Next-Generation Learners Raw Score Weighted Score Achievement(Proficiency) Gap Growth Readiness for College/Career Graduation Rate Total School/District Classifications Distinguished Proficient Needs Improvement Persistently Low-Achieving Component Score Next-Generation Instructional Programs and Support Raw Score Weighted Score Program Reviews Writing Program Review PL/CS Program Review A & H Total School/District Classifications Recognition and Support The Overall Score shall be used to classify schools and districts for recognition and support Component Score Distinguished Proficient Needs Improvement Next-Generation Professionals Raw Score Weighted Score Percent Effective Teachers Percent Effective Leaders Total School/District Classifications Component Score Distinguished Proficient Needs Improvement

Support for Effective Schools and Districts School/District Classification Category/Qualifications District/School of High Distinction Top 5% of Classification Distinguished (may not have any persistently low-achieving schools) District/School of Distinction Those Receiving National Accreditation Proficient Proficient Districts/schools with proficient overall score On the Move Improvement in learners, instructional programs/support and professionals OR Top 10% of improvement overall ------------------ Progress in needs improvement Sub-categories Proficient – On the Move Proficient districts/schools making progress Needs Improvement – On the Move Needs Improvement districts/schools making progress Top 80% of Needs Improvement Districts/Schools Supports Bottom 20% of Needs Improvement Districts/Schools Targeted Supports Needs Improvement (Low, Middle, High) Persistently Low-Achieving Bottom 5% or five, whichever is greater Support outlined by KRS 160.346