© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Intermediate-level learner
Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
Table 1. A list of interview questions with lecturers
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
Table 8. Drawing result before game
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators
Table 7. Clinical Practice
Table 3. Shared Governance
in the last evaluation of the software
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 2. Test of Normality
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
To what extend do you buy products or services through SMA?
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 5. Organizational Procedures
Table 9. The proposed administrative procedures
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
Training Programs in Management and Leadership
Table 2. Demographic characteristics of the study subjects
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
t-test for Equality of Means
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Students` responses
Table 5. Response on Indicators for Emotion focused Coping Techniques
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Educational Attainment
Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 2. Mean responses between male and female students on peer group influence S/N Item Male Female Remark Mean (SD) N=60 1 I belong to a peer group 4.00(1.19) 4.07(0.94) Agree 2 I spend much time with my peer group 3.97(0.90) 3.78(1.10) 3 My current achievement in chemistry is worse 2.18(1.22) 2.60(1.34) Disagree 4 My current achievement in chemistry is better than the previous one before I met my friends 3.98(1.14) 4.25(0.83) 5 I often skip chemistry classes to spend time with my friends 2.06(1.07) 1.91(1.30) 6 I and my friends are always punctual to chemistry class 3.76(1.03) 3.90(1.00) 7 I and my friends compete for good grades 4.20(0.81) 4.31(0.67) 8 We study chemistry together after class 3.96(0.81) 9 We always help each other with academic difficulties 4.10(0.68) 4.13(0.65) 10 My friends have assisted me improve my grades in chemistry 4.03(1.20) 3.86(0.65) 11 I and my friends always solve any assignment given to us in Chemistry 4.21(0.78) 4.08(0.74) 12 My friends like to persuade me in the class while the chemistry lesson is going on 2.25(1.29) 2.66(1.29) 13 We always perform experiment during chemistry 2.91(1.18) 3.05(1.34) 14 I and my friends always revised together before chemistry examination and test 4.38(0.76) 3.96(0.76) 15 I and my friends dislike chemistry as a subject 1.93(1.51) 2.20(1.08) Jack Gladys Uzezi et al. Relationship between Peer Group Influence and Students’ Academic Achievement in Chemistry at Secondary School Level. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, 350-356. doi:10.12691/education-5-4-2 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.