Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.
Advertisements

STEM Endorsements. The Charge The STEM Advisory Council requested an implementation model for creating a STEM endorsement or endorsements Include a description.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Changes in Academic Policies from the Academic Policy Committee and Related Administrative Policy Presented October 24, 2012 by Kay Reed, Assistant Dean,
The ELSA for Children Legal Research Group. ELSA for Children LRG ELSA for Children.
College Strategic Plan by
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
University of Peshawar 13 th QEC Meeting August 18-19,2009, Karachi.
Training for Implementation of CEC§ Creating AA-T and AS-T (SB 1440 Transfer Degrees) Spring 2011 February 1, 2011.
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
1 AU Five-Year Strategic Plan (2014 – 2018) Meeting of School Representatives 27 February 2014 Dr. Sompit Porsutyaruk Vice President for Academic Affairs.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Blended and Flipped Learning Models for International and Multidisciplinary Graduate Program on Language Education in Teaching, Coaching and Training Careers.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF:HEd) Opening Address Dr. Sompit Porsutyaruk 7 October 2010.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Computational Science Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science Chulalongkorn University.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Quality Assurance Systems Somboonwan Satyarakwit, D.B.A. Vice President for Academic Affairs Dhurakij Pundit University 1.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot.
1 The faculty and SOMA welcome all master students to a seminar Monday at – How to get a PhD?
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Training for staff members responsible for writing self-evaluation reports of study programmes, May 2011 University of Tuzla Prof. Dr Emina Nakaš-Ićindić.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Psychology Minor Tutorial
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
IST EdD Orientation “Advanced” students
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Quality of Education System
Program requirements Linguistics new graduate student orientation
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
GRADUATE PROGRAM COORDINATOR GRADUATE CURRICULUM SERIES
Faculty Of Education Developing higher education programs between international and national standards Prepared by Dr. Mohammed H. Abu- Rasain Dr.Rafik.
Q3 Academic Year (January – March 2018)
Committee Purpose Roles COR Standards Curriculum Review Process
Training for Faculty Reviewers
Advising Doctoral Students
Graduate Program Update
Minnesota’s Academic Standards
Computer Science Section
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Overview of Academic Staff Title Change Process
Early Childhood Education at Institute of Education and Research
Istanbul University, Department of Economics BEYAZIT-FATIH ISTANBUL
Role of students in quality
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Interdisciplinary Doctoral Programme in ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (KhNUE)
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Assumption University
Presentation transcript:

Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University Date : March 18, 2019 Presented by : Dr. Nathaya Pupat - Director Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs

AGENDA Part I - Process and Time-Frame of Program Modification in Academic Year 2019 Part II - Comparative Table of current program and modified program Part III - Program Specification ( TQF 2 )

Process and Time-frame of program modification in Academic Year 2019 (Continued….) Part I

Underneath was the suggested process of program modification Part I Process and Time-frame of program modification in Academic Year 2019 (Continued….) Underneath was the suggested process of program modification Collect feedback, comments, recommendation from the stakeholders Hold a meeting (s) of all faculty members in the program to share information and ideas, and brainstorm

Part I Process and Time-frame of program modification in Academic Year 2019 (Continued….) 3. Hold a meeting (s) of the program Administrative Committee to discuss the necessary/appropriate changes and prepare a comparative table 4. Draft the changes 5. Hold a meeting (s) to discuss and finalize the draft

Complete the drafted Program Specification (TQF 2) Part I Process and Time-frame of program modification in Academic Year 2019 (Continued….) Complete the drafted Program Specification (TQF 2) Submit the drafted TQF 2 and Comparative Table to the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs as defined schedule 8. Hold a meeting (s) of the Program Development Committee (appointed by the President)

Program Development Committee Form

10. Submit the TQF 2 and the comparative Part I Process and Time-frame of program modification in Academic Year 2019 (Continued….) 9. Make changes/corrections based on the Program Development Committee’s suggestions 10. Submit the TQF 2 and the comparative table to the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs to propose to the Academic Committee

11. Make changes/corrections based on the Part I Process and Time-frame of program modification in Academic Year 2018 (Continued….) 11. Make changes/corrections based on the Academic Committee’s suggestions Submit the final TQF 2 and comparative table to the Office of the Vice President for Academic Affairs to propose to the University Council

Comparative table of current program & Modified program (Continued…) Part II

Comparative table of current program & Modified program (Continued…) Part II Curriculum Structure (Bachelor’s Degree) General Education Courses (minimum number of credits: 30 credits) Language Courses Humanities Courses Social Science Courses Science and Mathematics Courses

Comparative table of current program & Modified program (Continued…) Part II Specialized Courses (72 credits/4-year program, 90 credits/5-year program, 108 credits/ 6-year program) Single major ≥ 30 credits of major courses Major and minor ≥ 30 credits of major courses and ≥ 15 credits of minor courses Double major ≥ 60 (30+30) credits of major courses and 150 credits for the whole program Free Elective Courses (minimum number of credits: 6 credits)

≥ 12 credits Comparative table of current program & Part II Modified program (Continued…) Part II Curriculum Structure (Master’s Degree Program) Plan A Type A1: Thesis Thesis 36 credits Plan A Type A2: Coursework and Thesis Required Courses Elective Courses Thesis ≥ 12 credits Total ≥ 36 credits ≥ 12 credits

Comparative table of current program & Modified program (Continued…) Part II Plan B Coursework and Independent Study Required Courses Elective Courses Independent Study 3-6 credits Total ≥ 36 credits 33-30 Credits

Comparative table of current program & Modified program (Continued…) Part II Curriculum Structure (Doctoral Degree) Type 1.1 Dissertation (Master’s degree holder) Dissertation ≥ 48 Credits Type 1.2 Dissertation (Bachelor’s degree holder) Dissertation ≥ 72 Credits

≥ 12 Credits Comparative table of current program & Part II Modified program (Continued…) Part II Type 2.1 Coursework and Dissertation (Master’s degree holder) Required Courses Elective Courses Dissertation ≥ 36 credits Total ≥ 48 credits ≥ 12 Credits

≥ 24 Credits Comparative table of current program & Part II Modified program (Continued…) Part II Type 2.2 Coursework and Dissertation (Bachelor’s degree holder) Required Courses Elective Courses Dissertation ≥ 48 credits Total ≥ 72 credits ≥ 24 Credits

Comparative table of current program & Modified program (Continued…) Part II Courses

Comparative table of current program & Modified program (Continued…) Part II Plan of Study

Comparative table of current program & Modified program (Continued…) Part II Course description

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) What is TQF? TQF stands for Thai Qualification Framework for Higher Education: TQF: HEd TQF is the educational guidelines to ensure the higher education institution producing the quality graduate alignment with the domains of learning outcomes which consist of 5 domains which are

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Morals and Ethics Knowledge Cognitive Skills Interpersonal Skills and Responsibilities Numerical Analysis, Communication and Information Technology Skills Psychomotor Skill (if have)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Program Specification (TQF 2) consists of 8 sections Section 1 : General Information Section 2 : Program Specific Information Section 3 : Educational Management System, implementation and curriculum structure

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 4 : Learning Outcomes, Teaching ad Evaluation Strategies. Section 5 : Student Evaluation Criteria Section 6 : Faculty Development Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance Section 8 : Program Evaluation and Improvement

Modification Guidelines ; has been raised only significant points Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Modification Guidelines ; has been raised only significant points

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Program Standard Criteria B.E.2558 Faculty Member Responsible for the Program Bachelor’s Program Hold at least a Master’s degree or an assistant professor title Have produced in the past 5 years at least 1 academic work which is not a part of graduation requirements and published in accordance with the publication criteria specified for academic title appointment

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Program Standard Criteria B.E.2558 Have at least 5 faculty members responsible for the program. In case the program has more than one study track, each track must have at least 3 faculty members responsible for the program.

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Program Standard Criteria B.E.2558 Master’s Degree Program Hold a doctoral degree or have at least a master’s degree and an associate professor title, Have produced in the past 5 years at least 3 academic works one of which is a research which is not a part of graduation requirements and published in accordance with the publication criteria specified for academic title appointment. Have at least 3 faculty members responsible for the program.

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Doctoral Degree Program Hold a doctoral degree or have at least a master’s degree and a professor title, Have produced in the past 5 years at least 3 academic works one of which is a research which is not a part of graduation requirements and published in accordance with the publication criteria specified for academic title appointment. Have at least 3 faculty member responsible for the program

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Program Standard criteria B.E.2558 Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Program Standard criteria B.E.2558 Program Faculty Members Bachelor ’s Degree Program Hold at least a Master’s degree or an assistant professor title Have produced in the past 5 years at least 1 academic works which is not a part of graduation requirements and published in accordance with the publication criteria specified for academic title appointment

Program Standard criteria B.E.2558 Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Program Standard criteria B.E.2558 Master’s Degree Program Hold at least a Master’s degree Have produced in the past 5 years at least 3 academic works one of which is a research which is not a part of graduation requirements and published in accordance with the publication criteria specified for academic title appointment

Program Standard criteria B.E.2558 Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Program Standard criteria B.E.2558 Doctoral Degree Program Hold at doctoral degree or have at least a master’s degree and an associate professor title Have produced in the past 5 years at least 3 academic works one of which is a research which is not a part of graduation requirements and published in accordance with the publication criteria specified for academic title appointment

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance Standard Control 1.1 Program administration in compliance with the higher education program standard criteria specified by OHEC Bachelor’s Degree Program 4 criteria Graduate Program 12 criteria

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 2. Graduates 2.1 Graduate quality in accordance with TQF : HEd Evaluation results of graduate quality in accordance with TQF : HEd (from employers, stakeholders, etc.) 2.2 Graduates’ employment status or research Bachelor’s degree graduates who can secure jobs or who can be self-employed Master’s degree students’ / Doctoral degree students’ published and / or disseminated works

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 3. Students 3.1 Student admission Student admission Student preparation before entering university 3.2 Student development Supervision of academic advising and counseling for bachelor’s degree students Supervision of thesis / dissertation and independent study advising for graduate students Activities for the development of students’ capabilities and learning skills for the 21st century

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 3. Students 3.3 Effects on students Retention rate Graduation rate Students’ satisfaction and results of students’ complaint management

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 4. Faculty Member 4.1 Management and development of faculty members Recruitment and appointment of program faculty members Management of faculty members Faculty development

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 4. Faculty Member 4.2 Faculty members’ quality Program faculty members holding a doctoral degree (%) Program faculty members holding and academic title (%) Program faculty members’ academic works (Doctoral degree program) Ratio of program faculty members’ cited articles in TCI and SCOPUS to the number of program faculty members 4.3 Effects on faculty members Faculty members remaining in the university (%) Faculty members’ satisfaction

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 5. Program, Teaching-Learning and Student Evaluation 5.1 Course content Program design and course content Program update in line with the development in the field of study 5.2 Lectures’ working assignment management system and teaching-learning process Selection of lecturers for teaching assignment Monitoring and following up of TQF 3 and TQF 4 preparation and teaching-learning process Integration of research, academic service and preservation of art and culture with teaching-learning in bachelor’s degree program

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 5. Program, Teaching-Learning and Student Evaluation 5.2 Lectures’ working assignment management system and teaching-learning process Supervising the selection of thesis / dissertation titles and independent study topics in graduate program to ensure that they are within the scope of the field of study and go along with the development in the field of study Appointment of thesis / dissertation and independent study advisors in graduate program whose specialization is related to the thesis / dissertation titles and independent study topics

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 5. Program, Teaching-Learning and Student Evaluation 5.2 Lectures’ working assignment management system and teaching-learning process Assisting, monitoring and following up of the thesis / dissertation and independent study progress including the publication of thesis / dissertation and independent study

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 5. Program, Teaching-Learning and Student Evaluation 5.3 Students’ evaluation Students’ learning outcome evaluation in accordance with TQF : HEd Checking of evaluation of students’ learning outcomes Supervision of the teaching-learning evaluation and program evaluation (TQF 5, 6 and 7) Thesis / dissertation and independent study evaluation

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 5. Program, Teaching-Learning and Student Evaluation 5.4 Program performance in compliance with the Thai Qualifications Framework for Higher Education (TQF:HEd) Achievement of TQF:Hed Performance Indicators

Program Specification (TQF 2) Part III Program Specification (TQF 2) Section 7 : Program Quality Assurance 6. Learning Support Facilities Department / School / Institution system of acquiring learning support facilities with the participation of program faculty members Appropriateness and sufficiency of learning support facilities Process for facility improvement based on the evaluation results of faculty members’ and students’ satisfaction with learning support facilities

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Part III Program Specification (TQF 2)

Program Modification Documentation

CHE Curriculum Online (CHECO)

Q & A