Volume 99, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure S1. Production of recombinant NS1 protein
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2008)
Bid, a Bcl2 Interacting Protein, Mediates Cytochrome c Release from Mitochondria in Response to Activation of Cell Surface Death Receptors  Xu Luo, Imawati.
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Macrophage-Derived Metalloelastase Is Responsible for the Generation of Angiostatin in Lewis Lung Carcinoma  Zhongyun Dong, Rakesh Kumar, Xiulan Yang,
BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
PHAPI, CAS, and Hsp70 Promote Apoptosome Formation by Preventing Apaf-1 Aggregation and Enhancing Nucleotide Exchange on Apaf-1  Hyun-Eui Kim, Xuejun.
Human peptidoglycan recognition protein S is an effector of neutrophil-mediated innate immunity by Ju Hyun Cho, Iain P. Fraser, Koichi Fukase, Shoichi.
Apaf-1, a Human Protein Homologous to C
RhoGDI Is Required for Cdc42-Mediated Cellular Transformation
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase γ by Ras
A Human Nuclear-Localized Chaperone that Regulates Dimerization, DNA Binding, and Transcriptional Activity of bZIP Proteins  Ching-Man A Virbasius, Susanne.
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages (April 1998)
The Polycomb Protein Pc2 Is a SUMO E3
Volume 13, Issue 22, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 1996)
ARAP3 Is a PI3K- and Rap-Regulated GAP for RhoA
BTK Regulates PtdIns-4,5-P2 Synthesis
MyD88: An Adapter That Recruits IRAK to the IL-1 Receptor Complex
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Recombinant Scinderin Enhances Exocytosis, an Effect Blocked by Two Scinderin- Derived Actin-Binding Peptides and PIP2  L Zhang, M.G Marcu, K Nau-Staudt,
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
PRAS40 Is an Insulin-Regulated Inhibitor of the mTORC1 Protein Kinase
Interaction of Cortactin and N-WASp with Arp2/3 Complex
Victor Faúndez, Jim-Tong Horng, Regis B Kelly  Cell 
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Jakub M. Swiercz, Rohini Kuner, Jürgen Behrens, Stefan Offermanns 
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 1999)
Cyclin G Recruits PP2A to Dephosphorylate Mdm2
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
GTP Hydrolysis by Ran Is Required for Nuclear Envelope Assembly
Regulation of protein kinase C ζ by PI 3-kinase and PDK-1
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
John M Schmitt, Philip J.S Stork  Molecular Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 17, Pages S1-986 (September 1999)
LGN Blocks the Ability of NuMA to Bind and Stabilize Microtubules
Frank S Lee, Jeremiah Hagler, Zhijian J Chen, Tom Maniatis  Cell 
RhoA GTPase Regulates B Cell Receptor Signaling
Volume 87, Issue 3, Pages (November 1996)
SIRT1 Regulates the Function of the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Protein
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Elva Dı́az, Suzanne R Pfeffer  Cell 
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Volume 90, Issue 6, Pages (September 1997)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 99, Issue 5, Pages 521-532 (November 1999) Phosphatidylinositol 4-Phosphate 5-Kinase α Is a Downstream Effector of the Small G Protein ARF6 in Membrane Ruffle Formation  Akira Honda, Masahiro Nogami, Takeaki Yokozeki, Masakazu Yamazaki, Hiroshi Nakamura, Hiroshi Watanabe, Kazumasa Kawamoto, Kazuhisa Nakayama, Andrew J Morris, Michael A Frohman, Yasunori Kanaho  Cell  Volume 99, Issue 5, Pages 521-532 (November 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8

Figure 1 Effects of GTPγS and PA on PI(4,5)P2 Production in Bovine Brain Cytosol (A) Bovine brain cytosol was incubated alone (open columns), with 40 μM of GTPγS (stippled columns), with 50 μM PA (hatched columns), or with both (solid columns), in the absence (left four columns) or presence (right four columns) of 0.2 M ammonium sulfate, following which the amounts of [32P]PI(4,5)P2 generated were determined as described in Experimental Procedures. The upper panel shows an autoradiogram of the [32P]PI(4,5)P2 produced, which was separated by TLC. (B) Bovine brain cytosol was incubated alone (open circles) or with 40 μM of GTPγS (closed circles) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of PA and of 0.2 M ammonium sulfate as above. (C) Vehicle (left four columns) or the COS-7 cell-expressed recombinant mouse PI(4)P5Kα (right four columns) was added to bovine brain cytosol, which was then assayed in the presence of 0.2 M ammonium sulfate as in (A). The results shown in (A), and (B) and (C) are from a single experiment in single and duplicate, respectively, representative of five performed. The error bars represent the differences of duplicate determinations. Cell 1999 99, 521-532DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8)

Figure 2 Purification of a GTPγS-Dependent Activator of PI(4)P5Kα from Bovine Brain Cytosol Bovine brain cytosol proteins were precipitated with ammonium sulfate at 25%–60% saturation and subjected to sequential chromatography on DEAE Sephacel (A), Sephacryl S-300 HR (B), Hydroxyapatite (C), Phenyl-TOYOPEARL 650M (D), and Superdex 75 HR 10/30 columns (E). Each column fraction was assessed for activation of COS-7 cell-expressed recombinant mouse PI(4)P5Kα in the presence of 0.2 M ammonium sulfate, 40 μM GTPγS, and 50 μM PA as in Figure 1. Fractions eluted from the Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column were additionally analyzed by SDS-PAGE/CBB staining (F). The results shown are from a single experiment representative of three performed with independent preparations of bovine brain cytosol. Cell 1999 99, 521-532DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8)

Figure 3 Identification of ARF1/ARF3 as the GTPγS-Dependent Activator of PI(4)P5Kα (A) The purified GTPγS-dependent activator of PI(4)P5Kα was digested with trypsin and the fragments obtained were purified and sequenced as described in Experimental Procedures. The sequences of the six fragments determined are shown in italic type with numbers. Boxes represent sequences identical to those of the purified activator. Dots represent amino acid residues identical to the sequence of ARF1. (B) Proteins in fractions eluted from the Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column were analyzed by Western blotting using an anti-ARF antibody. (C) Proteins in the peak fraction 27 from the Superdex 75 HR 10/30 column were blotted with anti-ARF, anti-RhoA, anti-Rac1, and anti-Cdc42 antibodies. The results shown are from a single experiment representative of three performed with independently purified preparations of the PI(4)P5Kα activator. Cell 1999 99, 521-532DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8)

Figure 4 Reconstitution of Synergistic Activation of PI(4)P5Kα by ARFs and PA, but Not by RhoA, Rac1, and Other Phospholipids (A) Recombinant PI(4)P5Kα (15 nM) and the indicated concentrations of myr-ARF1 (squares), both of which were purified from E. coli, or purified ARF from bovine brain cytosol (circles) were combined and assayed for 25 min at 37°C with 40 μM of GDP (open symbols) or GTPγS (closed symbols) in the presence of 50 μM PA following which [32P]PI(4,5)P2 production was quantitated. (B) Bacterial recombinant PI(4)P5Kα (15 nM) was assayed in combination with vehicle or 30 nM of recombinant ARF1, ARF5, or ARF6 purified from COS-7 cells in the presence of 40 μM of GTPγS and 50 μM PA. (C) Bacterial recombinant PI(4)P5Kα (15 nM) was assayed in combination with vehicle or 500 nM of recombinant ARF1, RhoA, or Rac1 purified from Sf9 cells in the presence of 40 μM of GTPγS and 50 μM PA. (D) Bacterial recombinant PI(4)P5Kα (15 nM) was combined with myr-ARF1 (300 nM) and assayed in the presence of 12.5 μM of the indicated phospholipids and 40 μM of GDP (open columns) or GTPγS (solid columns). In this experiment, the PI(4)P substrate was used at 12.5 μM. (E) Bacterial myr-ARF1 (3 μM) was incubated for 25 min at 37°C with 10 μM of [35S]GTPγS in the presence of 12.5 μM of the indicated phospholipids. [35S]GTPγS bound to myr-ARF1 was determined as described in Experimental Procedures. (F) Bacterial recombinant PI(4)P5Kα (15 nM) was incubated for 20 min at room temperature with 150 μM PE/20 μM PC vesicles containing 200 μM of PE (open column) or PA (solid column) in the presence of 100 mM NaCl and 5 mg/ml BSA. After centrifugation, PI(4)P5K activity in the supernatant was determined as described in Experimental Procedures. Shown are the results from a single experiment in duplicate and representative of five with similar results. The error bars represent the differences of duplicate determinations. Cell 1999 99, 521-532DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8)

Figure 5 ARF6-Dependent Translocation of PI(4)P5Kα to Ruffling Membranes with Concomitant PI(4,5)P2 Formation and Cotranslocation of PLD2 (A) Myc-PI(4)P5Kα was cotransfected with ARF1-HA, ARF5-HA, or ARF6-HA in HeLa cells. After 6 hr of additional culture in the presence of 5% FCS, cells were treated without or with AlF4 (30 mM sodium fluoride plus 50 μM aluminum chloride) at 37°C for 30 min, and localization of ARFs and PI(4)P5Kα was then visualized as described under Experimental Procedures. (B) HeLa cells cotransfected with myc-PI(4)P5Kα and ARF6-HA were cultured in DMEM without FCS for 36 hr, stimulated with 10 ng/ml of EGF at 37°C for the times indicated, then processed as in (A). (C) Wild-type ARF6-HA or the dominant-negative mutant ARF6 N122I-HA was cotransfected with myc-PI(4)P5Kα in HeLa cells. Cells were further cultured as in (B), then stimulated with 10 ng/ml of EGF at 37°C for 7 min and imaged as in (A). (D) HeLa cells cotransfected with GFP-PH/PLCδ1, myc-PI(4)P5Kα, and ARF6, were cultured and stimulated with EGF as in (B), and imaged as in (A). (E) HeLa cells cotransfected with HA-PLD2, myc-PI(4)P5Kα, and ARF6, were cultured and stimulated with EGF as in (B), and imaged as in (A). Shown is one experiment representative of five performed. Cell 1999 99, 521-532DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8)

Figure 6 Analysis for the Mechanisms by which Membrane Ruffles Are Formed (A) Myc-Rac1 G12V was cotransfected with myc-PI(4)P5Kα and with wild type ARF6-HA or the dominant-negative mutant ARF6 N122I-HA in HeLa cells. After culture in DMEM without FCS for 36 hr, localization of the tagged proteins was visualized as described under Experimental Procedures. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with Rac1 G12V, cultured 34 hr, then microinjected with 2 mg/ml of control mouse IgG or the monoclonal anti-PI(4,5)P2 antibody (AM212). After 2 hr, actin filaments and IgG were visualized as described under Experimental Procedures. (C) HeLa cells were transfected with Rac1 T17N (shown) or mock (not shown), cultured for 32 hr, and then microinjected with expression vectors for ARF6 and PI(4)P5Kα. After 4 hr, cells were stimulated with 10 ng/ml of EGF at 37°C for 7 min, and localization of ARF6, PI(4)P5Kα and PI(4,5)P2 were visualized as described under Experimental Procedures. Shown is one experiment representative of five performed. Cell 1999 99, 521-532DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8)

Figure 7 Working Hypothesis for the Mechanisms of PI(4)P5Kα Activation and of Membrane Ruffling Formation upon EGF Stimulation See text for details. Cell 1999 99, 521-532DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81540-8)