Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students The goal of the study: To assess progress in applying teaching methods.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A.Review of PISA constructs and indices (and variables) to identify those that are likely to be operable and not operable in developing country contexts,
Advertisements

Connecting Teacher Evaluation to Student Academic Progress Implementing Standard 7 0 August 2012.
Grading in Health and Physical Education Evaluating Student Achievement.
MAKING MEANING. Then and Now  Teacher is modeling a specific comprehension strategy and reading the story aloud  Students are actively engaged – responding.
NCES International Assessments and the International Data Explorer Education Writers Association April 7, 2011 Dana Kelly NCES.
Bellringer #2: Geography Terms. Birth Rate The # of live births per 1000 individuals within a population. The # of live births per 1000 individuals within.
Performance Based Assessment: Communicative Activities and Rubrics in Foreign Language Instruction Dr. Milena M. Hurtado Cumberland County Staff Development.
Standards-Based Report Cards in Denton ISD. What is a Standards-Based Report Card? It reports a child’s progress toward meeting state and district standards.
The Work of the Coach Identify target students and populations Maintain data on each interaction with students and families | Contact Summary Provide.
 You Can ’ t  You CAN encourage them to “ motivate themselves ”  How…
MICS Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop Organized by UNICEF ___RO and HQ Day, Month, Year.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.
1 Assessment. 2  Formative assessment – assessment for learning  Summative assessment – assessment of learning.
The child does not respond to his/her name. The child cannot explain what he/she wants. Language skills or speech are delayed. The child doesn't follow.
SHRM Poll – Social Networking Websites and Recruiting During Financially Challenging Times October 24, 2008.
Presentation Overview 1. Why Focus on PEN in Lao PDR 2. Methodology 3. Poverty Indicators 4. Environment Indicators 5. Linkages between Poverty and Environment.
Davide Azzolini, FBK-IRVAPP Enrico Rettore, FBK-IRVAPP Antonio Schizzerotto, FBK-IRVAPP MENTEP Kick-Off Meeting Brussels, April 2015.
Introducing. Allows teachers to match little books to a child's or group’s level of math understanding, providing rich opportunities for teaching and.
Finding supports ADVANCED SOCIAL COMMUNICATION MIDDLE SCHOOL: LESSON FOUR.
Integrating SMART technology into the existing English Curriculum Michelle Weisgerber Northeast High School.
S A N D I E G O U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T - H I V P R I O R I T Y 2014 School Health Profiles Report Weighted Lead Health Education Teacher.
National Society ICT Health Check
Serhii Dembitskyi, PhD Institute of Sociology NAS of Ukraine
The Impact of Chronic Disease on a Future NHI
Vacant and Distressed Property and Community Health and Safety
IUSD Reclassification
WHO Surveillance Tools for NCD Risk Factors – Instruments and Data Sources Surveillance and Population-based Prevention Unit Department for Prevention.
INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS IN QATAR TIMSS
S A N D I E G O U N I F I E D S C H O O L D I S T R I C T
University High School and TCH 216
Assessments for Monitoring and Improving the Quality of Education
S U B U R B A N C O O K C O U N T Y 2012 School Health Profiles Report
RHIVA and IQ SROI Introduction
Assessing and Reporting Children’s Progress
Kindergarten Entrance Assessment
Rice Pilot of IDEA evaluation system
Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Tissue Bank – April 2016
Nutrition Sub-Cluster Meeting Presentation December 9, 2016
الوحدة 20 مهارات التواصل مع الآخرين
The Impact of Chronic Disease on a Future NHI
HCS 535 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Conclusions and Recommendations
Ukrainian Crisis: Views in NATO, Russia and Ukraine
BRIC VS. NON-BRIC E-commerce shopper insights MALCOLM PINKERTON
Islington Residents’ Survey 2018 March 2018
Blended Learning
Disabilities Sample comprised of 311 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing 311 responses of 2,801 s sent, 2,740 s were received (response.
Métis Youth Programming
Pupils need to understand what is asked, and have 2 or 3 stabs at it.
Erasmus + CAPACITY BUILDING IN THE FIELD OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Geoscience Projects and The Online Evaluation Resource Library (OERL)
Ronald C. Jester Robert A. Wilson University of Delaware
Outcome Monitoring and Evaluation Using LQAS
I N D I A N A 2016 School Health Profiles Report
Enhancement of Learning Support
EUROSTAT Meeting, Luxembourg, 6/7 December, 2001
Session 1.3. Types of EFSA in the Region
United Nations Statistics Division
Biomedical Technology 1
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)
Main challenges in the Pacific subregion
Unit 1 Day 5: Parameter vs. Statistic
ATTITUDES TOWARD SMOKE-FREE ALTERNATIVES & PUBLIC HEALTH: UKRAINE RESULTS 94% believe technology and innovation play an important role in addressing public.
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PESTICIDE USAGE STATISTICS A summary
Copyright. Approaches to Population Health in 2015: A National Survey of Hospitals.
Reading Street & Assessment
Year 7 Partnership Evening
Resource Adequacy Technical Committee Meeting April 22, 2010
Assessment of students’ key life skills by teachers
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students The goal of the study: To assess progress in applying teaching methods in the Basics of Health classes that meet the requirements of effective social skills education, namely: Work in pairs or in groups Eye contact Interactive methods Use of life stories (cases) Active learning with alternating activities and rest Samples for comparison: Country-wide sample excl. the ECHO and UNICEF sample (the control group) The ЕCHO sample – educational establishments within 0-5 km of the contact line The UNICEF sample – educational establishments in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts excluding schools within 0-5 km of the contact line The ECHO and UNICEF schools – the ECHO and UNICEF samples combined

Online survey parameters Survey BEFORE : Period – 10-20 October 2017 Region – entire Ukraine Respondents: - teachers of grades 1-11 – 15,586 - students of grades 4-11 – 161,195 Survey AFTER : Period – 10-20 April 2018 Respondents: - teachers of grades 1-11 – 8,312 - students of grades 4-11 – 106,726

Sample: entire Ukraine excluding ECHO and UNICEF (the control group) Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students Sample: entire Ukraine excluding ECHO and UNICEF (the control group) Indicator: % of students reporting compliance of teaching methodologies with effective education criteria (the total of “Absolutely” and “Mostly” responses) Target population: students of grades 1-11 in general

Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students Sample: entire Ukraine excluding ECHO and UNICEF (the control group) Indicator: % of students reporting compliance of teaching methodologies with effective education criteria (the sum of “Totally” and “Mostly” responses) Target population: students of grades 1-11 in general Effective education criteria BEFORE (%) AFTER (%) Progress You often work in pairs or in groups 63.7 63.4 -0.3 In the class, you can see faces of your classmates 50.1 50.6 -0.5 A teacher mostly uses interactive methods 55.9 56.7 0.8 You discuss different life stories and situations 74.4 75.4 1 You actively work and never get tired 68.4 67.1 -1.3

Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students Sample: ЕCHO – educational establishments within 0-5 km of the contact line Indicator: % of students reporting compliance of teaching methodologies with effective education criteria (the total of “Absolutely” and “Mostly” responses) Target population: students of grades 1-11 in general

Effective education criteria Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students Sample: ЕCHO – educational establishments within 0-5 km of the contact line Indicator: % of students reporting compliance of teaching methodologies with effective education criteria (the total of “Absolutely” and “Mostly” responses) Target population: students of grades 1-11 in general Effective education criteria BEFORE (%) AFTER (%) Progress You often work in pairs or in groups 55.9 63.5 7.6 In the class, you can see faces of your classmates 44.9 51.3 6.4 A teacher mostly uses interactive methods 52.3 58.6 6.3 You discuss different life stories and situations 64.9 74.6 9.7 You actively work and never get tired 64.1 69 4.9

Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students Sample: UNICEF – educational establishments in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts excluding schools within 0-5 km of the contact line Indicator: % of students reporting compliance of teaching methodologies with effective education criteria (the total of “Absolutely” and “Mostly” responses) Target population: students of grades 1-11 in general

Effective education criteria Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students Sample: UNICEF – educational establishments in the Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts excluding schools within 0-5 km of the contact line Indicator: % of students reporting compliance of teaching methodologies with effective education criteria (the total of “Absolutely” and “Mostly” responses) Target population: students of grades 1-11 in general Effective education criteria BEFORE (%) AFTER (%) Progress You often work in pairs or in groups 60.2 68.6 8.4 In the class, you can see faces of your classmates 46.9 53.7 6.8 A teacher mostly uses interactive methods 62.8 9.1 You discuss different life stories and situations 71.6 78.4 You actively work and never get tired 66.2 71.2 5

Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students Sample: the ECHO and UNICEF schools – the ECHO and UNICEF samples combined Indicator: % of students reporting compliance of teaching methodologies with effective education criteria (the total of “Absolutely” and “Mostly” responses) Target population: students of grades 1-11 in general

Effective education criteria Assessment of teaching methodologies at the Basics of Health classes by students Sample: the ECHO and UNICEF schools – the ECHO and UNICEF samples combined Indicator: % of students reporting compliance of teaching methodologies with effective education criteria (the total of “Absolutely” and “Mostly” responses) Target population: students of grades 1-11 in general Effective education criteria BEFORE (%) AFTER (%) Progress You often work in pairs or in groups 60 67.9 7.9 In the class, you can see faces of your classmates 46.9 53 6.1 A teacher mostly uses interactive methods 53.7 62.1 8.4 You discuss different life stories and situations 71 77.8 6.8 You actively work and never get tired 66.1 70.7 4.6

The progress comparison The ECHO sample vs the control group Indicator: the progress in students’ assessments of teaching methodologies’ compliance with effective education criteria Target population: students of grades 1-11

The progress comparison The ECHO sample vs the control group Indicator: the progress in students’ assessments of teaching methodologies’ compliance with effective education criteria Target population: students of grades 1-11 Effective education criteria The control group (%) ECHO (%) Difference in progress (%) You often work in pairs or in groups -0.3 7.6 7.9 In the class, you can see faces of your classmates -0.5 6.4 6.9 A teacher mostly uses interactive methods 0.8 6.3 5.5 You discuss different life stories and situations 1 9.7 8.7 You actively work and never get tired -1.3 4.9 6.2

The progress comparison The UNICEF sample vs the control group Indicator: the progress in students’ assessments of teaching methodologies’ compliance with effective education criteria Target population: students of grades 1-11

The progress comparison The UNICEF sample vs the control group Indicator: the progress in students’ assessments of teaching methodologies’ compliance with effective education criteria Target population: students of grades 1-11 Effective education criteria The control group (%) UNICEF (%) Difference in progress (%) You often work in pairs or in groups -0.3 8.4 8.7 In the class, you can see faces of your classmates -0.5 6.8 7.3 A teacher mostly uses interactive methods 0.8 9.1 8.3 You discuss different life stories and situations 1 5.8 You actively work and never get tired -1.3 5 6.3

The progress comparison The ECHO and UNICEF samples combined vs the control group Indicator: the progress in students’ assessments of teaching methodologies’ compliance with effective education criteria Target population: students of grades 1-11

Effective education criteria Difference in progress The progress comparison The ECHO and UNICEF samples combined vs the control group Indicator: the progress in students’ assessments of teaching methodologies’ compliance with effective education criteria Target population: students of grades 1-11 Effective education criteria The control group (%) ECHO+ UNICEF (%) Difference in progress (%) You often work in pairs or in groups -0.3 7.9 8.2 In the class, you can see faces of your classmates -0.5 6.1 6.6 A teacher mostly uses interactive methods 0.8 8.4 7.6 You discuss different life stories and situations 1 6.8 5.8 You actively work and never get tired -1.3 4.6 5.9