Inter-device comparison Inter-device comparison. * Deposition with the Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebulizer was greater than with all other nebulizers (P < .01). † Deposition with the Maquet ultrasonic nebulizer was greater than with the Salter 8900 nebulizer (P < .05). ‡ Deposition with the Maquet ultrasonic nebulizer was greater than with the Hudson Updraft II Opti-Neb nebulizer (P < .05). § Deposition with the Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebulizer was greater than with the Hudson Updraft II Opti-Neb and Salter 8900 nebulizers (P < .01). Inter-device comparison. * Deposition with the Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebulizer was greater than with all other nebulizers (P < .01). † Deposition with the Maquet ultrasonic nebulizer was greater than with the Salter 8900 nebulizer (P < .05). ‡ Deposition with the Maquet ultrasonic nebulizer was greater than with the Hudson Updraft II Opti-Neb nebulizer (P < .05). § Deposition with the Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh nebulizer was greater than with the Hudson Updraft II Opti-Neb and Salter 8900 nebulizers (P < .01). Ariel Berlinski, and J Randy Willis Respir Care 2013;58:1124-1133 (c) 2012 by Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.