PBq 144Ce-144Pr source in KamLAND

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pablo DEL AMO SANCHEZ Henri PESSARD 18/12/2012
Advertisements

Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
Results from Daya Bay Xin Qian On behalf of Daya Bay Collaboration Xin Qian, BNL1.
Sensitivity of the DANSS detector to short range neutrino oscillations
Source Neutrino Experiments
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
KamLand By Roy Lehn Omaha Roncalli. Means Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti- Neutrino Detector.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 6 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Experimental Status of Geo-reactor Search with KamLAND Detector
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
No s is good s Sheffield Physoc 21/04/2005 Jeanne Wilson A historical introduction to neutrinoless double beta decay.
Double Beta Decay With 20-ton Metal Loaded Scintillators A Detector for DUSEL? Frank Calaprice Princeton University Aldo Ianni LNGS.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 4 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Neutron background and possibility for shallow experiments Tadao Mitsui Research Center for Neutrino Science, Tohoku University December, 2005 Neutrino.
Experimental Approaches to Sterile Neutrinos Using Low Energy Neutrinos Jonathan Link Center for Neutrino Physics Virginia Tech NOW /14/12 9/14/12.
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
Pieter Mumm and Karsten Heeger January 10, 2012 Search for Sterile Neutrinos with Reactor Antineutrinos An Opportunity for NIST?
Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II.
Simulation study of RENO-50 Jungsic Park Seoul National University RENO-50 International Workshop June 13-14, 2013 Hoam Faculty House, Korea.
LENS-CAL I. Barabanov, V. Gurentsov, V. Kornoukhov Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow and R. S. Raghavan, Virginia Tech LONU-LENS Blacksburg, Oct 15,
KamLAND : Studying Neutrinos from Reactor Atsuto Suzuki KamLAND Collaboration KEK : High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
RENO and the Last Result
Present and future detectors for Geo-neutrinos: Borexino and LENA Applied Antineutrino Physics Workshop APC, Paris, Dec L. Oberauer, TU München.
LSc development for Solar und Supernova Neutrino detection 17 th Lomonosov conference, Moscow, August 2015 L. Oberauer, TUM.
Neutrino Oscillations in vacuum Student Seminar on Subatomic Physics Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics Dennis Visser
Kr2Det: TWO - DETECTOR REACTOR NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENT AT KRASNOYARSK UNDERGROUND SITE L. Mikaelyan for KURCHATOV INSTITUTE NEUTRINO GROUP.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
LoNu Workshop R. B. Vogelaar October 14, 2006 Extraordinary Neutrino Beam Free of Charge For NEUTRINO PHYSICS: WELL DEFINED HIGHEST FLUX (~10 11 cm -2.
Results for the Neutrino Mixing Angle  13 from RENO International School of Nuclear Physics, 35 th Course Neutrino Physics: Present and Future, Erice/Sicily,
M. Wójcik for the GERDA Collaboration Institute of Physics, Jagellonian University Epiphany 2006, Kraków, Poland, 6-7 January 2006.
Results from RENO Soo-Bong Kim (KNRC, Seoul National University) “17 th Lomosonov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics” Moscow. Russia, Aug ,
Nd double beta decay search with SNO+ K. Zuber, on behalf of the SNO+ collaboration.
The Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment R. D. McKeown Caltech On Behalf of the Daya Bay Collaboration CIPANP 2009.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Karsten Heeger Beijing, January 18, 2003 Design Considerations for a  13 Reactor Neutrino Experiment with Multiple Detectors Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence.
Double Chooz Near Detector Guillaume MENTION CEA Saclay, DAPNIA/SPP Workshop AAP 2007 Friday, December 14 th, 2007
Karsten Heeger, LBNL INPAC, October 3, 2003 Reactor Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment On behalf of the DayaBay collaboration Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Joseph ykHor YuenKeung,
Sterile Neutrinos at Borexino SOX G. Ranucci – INFN Milano On behalf of the Borexino Collaboration European Strategy for Neutrino Oscillation Physics -
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
Recent Results from RENO NUFACT2014 August. 25 to 30, 2014, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K. Hyunkwan Seo on behalf of the RENO Collaboration Seoul National University.
Sensitivity on sterile neutrinos with sources in Borexino A.Ianni Phys. Dept., Princeton May 9th, 2011.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Center for Neutrino Physics Source Neutrino Experiments Jonathan Link Center for Neutrino Physics Virginia Tech NuFact 2016.
Neutrino oscillations with radioactive sources and large detectors Wladyslaw H. Trzaska on behalf of: Yu.N. Novikov, T. Enqvist, A.N. Erykalov, F. v.Feilitzsch,
51 Cr Source Experiments for Sterile Neutrinos Jonathan Link Virginia Tech Sterile Neutrinos at the Crossroads 9/27/2011.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Review of Neutrino Coherent Scattering
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
NEUTRINO OSCILLATION MEASUREMENTS WITH REACTORS
SoLid: Recent Results and Future Prospects
Solar and Geo Neutrino Physics with Borexino RICAP
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Searches for Sterile neutrinos
Neutron backgrounds in KamLAND
Overview of the Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO)
Neutral Particles.
How precisely do we know the antineutrino source spectrum from a nuclear reactor? Klaus Schreckenbach (TU München) Klaus Schreckenbach.
Sterile Neutrino Searches with Sources and Reactors
Search for sterile neutrinos with SOX: Monte Carlo studies of the experiment sensitivity Davide Basilico 1st year Workshop – 11/10/17 Tutors: Dott. Barbara.
Current Results from Reactor Neutrino Experiments
KamLAND Update NuFact 05 Lauren Hsu June 21, 2005
Anti-Neutrino Simulations
Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment
Monoenergetic Neutrino Beam for Long Baseline Experiments
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Design Requirements for Jinping Underground Neutrino Experiment
Raju and Radioactive Neutrino Source Experiments
Presentation transcript:

PBq 144Ce-144Pr source in KamLAND CeLAND: PBq 144Ce-144Pr source in KamLAND Jelena Maricic on behalf of CeLAND/KamLAND collaboration CosPA 2013 Honolulu, 11/14/2013

Outline Physics motivation for the very short baseline neutrino oscillations search Concept of the antineutrino generator experiment 144Ce-144Pr PBq antineutrino generator Search for sterile neutrinos in KamLAND with 144Ce-144Pr PBq source: CeLAND Shielding, transportation, deployment Sensitivity to short baseline oscillations Summary and future steps Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Motivation for the short baseline antineutrino search G. Mention et al. Phys.Rev.D83:073006,2011 Nobs/Nexp = 0.927  0.023 Dash line: 3 ν’s Solid line: 3+ 1 ν states with Δm2 = 1 eV2 Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly  existence of 4th neutrino m2new ~ 1 eV2 ? Independent indications from accelerator experiments LSND and MiniBooNE Galium anomalies – 2.7  detected neutrino deficit observed in deployment of 51Cr and 37Ar sources in GALEX and SAGE solar neutrino experiments  Motivates search for new neutrino m2new ~ 1 eV2 with very short oscillation baseline ~ 1m in 1-10 MeV range, which has never been tested before

Testing short baseline oscillation If the 4th neutrino is present and oscillates  distance-dependent flux from the source will demonstrate it at the distances of the order of oscillation length from the neutrino source In case of sterile neutrino  m2 ~ 1-2 eV2, oscillation distance of interest is of the order of couple of meters. Large liquid scintillator detectors such as KamLAND, Borexino and SNO+ are sufficiently large to observe distance dependent oscillations signature from electron neutrino/antineutrino to proposed 4th neutrino state Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Neutrino and antineutrino generators Neutrino generators such as 51Cr and 37Ar have been used in the past Monoenergetic Require measurement of vertex position only for L/E Detection in LS via elastic scattering off electrons  must be very strong (5-10 MCi) to overcome solar neutrino background Antineutrino generators are detected in LS detected via inverse beta decay (IBD) Antineutrino energy > 1.8 MeV (IBD threshold) Lifetime > 1 month to allow time for production and transport Requires nuclei with high Qβ and long lifetime No single nucleus satisfies this condition Pairs of beta decay nuclei needed: the first one with low Qβ and long lifetime followed by the second one with high Qβ and short lifetime Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Inverse Beta Decay and Implications Dual, correlated signature in space and time Strong background suppression It is OK to use weaker source compared to neutrino ES source. 75 kCi source is sufficient for deployment in KamLAND Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

144Ce – 133Pr antineutrino generator Nuclei are in equilibrium Decay rate completely driven by 144Ce Antineutrino emitted in 144Ce decay below IBD threshold 1.8 MeV Antineutrinos above 1.8 MeV emitted in 144Pr undergo IBD 75 kCi source is planned Main intrinsic background comes from 2.185 keV gamma with 0.7% branching ratio similar energy as 2.2 MeV deexcitation gamma from neutron capture on hydrogen Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

144Ce source production I Natural cerium is mostly 140Ce (88.45%) in the form of CeO2 in presence of oxygen 144Ce is a fission product, with 5.2% fission yield from 235U It has the longest lifetime of all cerium isotopes (half-life 285 days) – much longer than any other isotope Its long half-life allows time for production from irradiated fuel, transport to reprocessing facility and year long deployment in the LS detector Fresher irradiated fuel has a higher 144Ce fraction, allowing a more compact packaging of the source and higher source activity, which is important for the oscillation measurement Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

144Ce source production II 144Ce source will be produced at Mayak reprocessing facility in Russia They will produce (85+15 –10)kCi source based on the beta activity measurement with 8% uncertainty. Excellent chance to get a source above 75 kCi activity at KamLAND! Usage of standard Mayak cylindrical container 15 cm in diameter and 15 cm in height, with double capsule walls (3 mm and 4 mm thick steel wit 0.5 mm gap) foreseen Extra space (if available) will be filled with additional CeO2 up to 100 kCi activity free of charge! This will depend on the fuel age; typical SNF 3-5 years old; possibility to use fresher fuel, just 1.7- 2 year after irradiation! 144Ce fraction between (0.6+0.1-0.15)% at 3 years after irradiation Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

144Ce Production at PA Mayak: 2014 75 kCi (2.77 PBq), 10 kg of Ce02 (3y, = 4.5 g/cm3), 600 W « Canyon » Displacement Chromatography: Liquid Cerium solution 137Cs, precip. REE VVR-440, storage Rare earth elements precipitation CeO2 calcination TUK-6 Pressing W-Shield PUREX – Plutonium Uranium Extraction Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

High Z-shielding Tungsten shielding that is 97% tungsten and  = 18.5 g/cm3 will be used Shielding has two-fold purpose: Biological protection during transportation and handling Suppression of the 2.186 MeV gamma during deployment: 525 Ci activity from 75kCi 144Ce Biological protection is estimated in terms of equivalent dose received by a person at 1 m distance from the surface of the shield/container 16 cm thick tungsten shield around 75 kCi source is sufficient for biological and deployment protection  2.2 ton weight Several transportation options under consideration Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Transportation options Boat By boat: slow and limited number of harbours can receive the source By air, 16.2 kCi limit in a single container imposed by IAEA No container so far has certificates for both Russia and Japan Investigating possibility for a special arrangement for transportation Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

KamLAND location 2700 mwe overburden Excellent place for the source experiment Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

KamLAND detector "Dome" Area Outer Detector Water Cherenkov Steel Deck Steel Sphere Tyvek light baffles OD PMT's Nylon Balloon 1 kton liquid scintillator 80% paraffin oil 20% pseudocumene 1.5 g/L PPO Paraffin outside the nylon balloon radon barrier 1879 PMT's 1325 17" ­ fast 544 20" ­ efficient 34% coverage 225 Veto PMT's Water Čherenkov Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Antineutrino generator in KL OD Advantages: safe, relatively simple to deploy through the access hatch of the OD, baseline 3.0 – 16 m, excellent shielding by 2.5 m thick layer of buffer oil; easier cooling; deployed in water as opposed to scintillator •Disadvantages: lot of neutrinos lost due to partial solid angle coverage (1/5 of the 4pi solid angle) Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Containment structure in OD Preliminary considerations conducted: Sock in OD Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Expected rate 75 kCi source for 18 months and t1/2 = 285 days for 144Ce Vertex resolution ~12 cm/Sqrt(E[MeV]) Energy resolution ~6.4%/Sqrt(E[MeV]) R = 6.5 m Assume that the source can be placed right next to the buffer vessel, so distance of the source from center of KL 9.6 m ~24,300 interactions in no oscillation scenario Using We get ~23,000 interactions for Compared to the same source in the center we get around 1/5 of rate in unoscillated case. Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Oscillated vs Unoscillated Spectrum Rate E[MeV] Distance[m] Rate Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii Distance[m] E[MeV]

Cumulative Rate vs. Energy Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Rate vs. distance Distance dependent shape distortion preserved with KL energy and vertex resolution. Shape distortion: convincing demonstration of sterile neutrino oscillations. Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii

Sensitivity to oscillation The best fit RAA solution can be probed after 0.5 years Strong bounds come from rate constraints at higher masses  plans to measure activity at 1% level Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii Courtesy of T. Lasserre

Summary and future steps Strong antineutrino sources have excellent potential to test reactor antineutrino anomaly and search for the 4th neutrino First time ever test of the 1-10 m baseline Production and transport of the source represents significant technical challenge With just 0.5 years of data taking interesting limits can be placed on RAA The most direct and simplest approach for detecting sterile neutrinos in this parameter space. Source delivery in 2014 and deployment in KL in 2015. Courtesy of G. Mention Jelena Maricic, University of Hawaii