Mariette Hitge, Adri Burger

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THREE-DIMENSIONAL ANISOTROPIC TRANSPORT OF SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES IN THE INNER HELIOSPHERE CRISM- 2011, Montpellier, 27 June – 1 July, Collaborators:
Advertisements

S. Della Torre 1,2, P. Bobik 5, G. Boella 1,3, M.J. Boschini 1,4, C. Consolandi 1, M. Gervasi 1,3, D. Grandi 1, K. Kudela 5, F. Noventa 1,3, S. Pensotti.
Study of Galactic Cosmic Rays at high cut- off rigidity during solar cycle 23 Partha Chowdhury 1 and B.N. Dwivedi 2 1 Department of Physics, University.
Las Cruces CRS April 21-22, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
Bastille Day 2000 Solar Energetic Particles Event: Ulysses observations at high heliographic latitudes M. Zhang Florida Institute of Technology.
The Acceleration of Anomalous Cosmic Rays by the Heliospheric Termination Shock J. A. le Roux, V. Florinski, N. V. Pogorelov, & G. P. Zank Dept. of Physics.
Atmospheric Motion ENVI 1400: Lecture 3.
High-latitude activity and its relationship to the mid-latitude solar activity. Elena E. Benevolenskaya & J. Todd Hoeksema Stanford University Abstract.
Absence of a Long Lasting Southward Displacement of the HCS Near the Minimum Preceding Solar Cycle 24 X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema and P. H. Scherrer Stanford.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
Thomas Zurbuchen University of Michigan The Structure and Sources of the Solar Wind during the Solar Cycle.
What coronal parameters determine solar wind speed? M. Kojima, M. Tokumaru, K. Fujiki, H. Itoh and T. Murakami Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory,
The Asymmetric Polar Field Reversal – Long-Term Observations from WSO J. Todd Hoeksema, Solar Observatories H.E.P.L., Stanford University SH13C-2278.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
The Sun. Solar Prominence Sun Fact Sheet The Sun is a normal G2 star, one of more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy. Diameter: 1,390,000 km (Earth.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
1 C. “Nick” Arge Space Vehicles Directorate/Air Force Research Laboratory SHINE Workshop Aug. 2, 2007 Comparing the Observed and Modeled Global Heliospheric.
Katya Georgieva Boian Kirov Simeon Asenovski
Solar Modulation: A Theoretical Perspective Modeling of cosmic ray charge-sign dependence in the heliosphere Marius Potgieter Unit for Space Physics North-West.
Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona I acknowledge helpful discussions with J. Kόta and J. GIacalone. Presented at the TeV.
Recurrent Cosmic Ray Variations in József Kόta & J.R. Jokipii University of Arizona, LPL Tucson, AZ , USA 23 rd ECRS, Moscow, Russia,
Space Weather from Coronal Holes and High Speed Streams M. Leila Mays (NASA/GSFC and CUA) SW REDISW REDI 2014 June 2-13.
Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections
The Solar Wind.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.
02-06 Dec 2013CHPC-Cape town1 A study of the global heliospheric modulation of galactic Carbon M. D. Ngobeni, M. S. Potgieter Centre for Space Research,
Conclusions Using the Diffusive Equilibrium Mapping Technique we have connected a starting point of a field line on the photosphere with its final location.
A new stationary analytical model of the heliospheric current sheet and the plasma sheet Roman Kislov IKI RAS 2015
P. Bobik, G. Boella, M. J. Boschini, M. Gervasi, D. Grandi, K. Kudela, S. Pensotti, P.G. Rancoita 2D Stochastic Monte Carlo to evaluate the modulation.
27-Day Variations Of The Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity And Anisotropy In Different Solar Magnetic Cycles ( ) M.V. Alania, A. Gil, K. Iskra, R.
Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.
Three dimensional tensor of cosmic rays for various interplanetary magnetic field structure Michael V. Alania Siedlce University, Poland.
ORIGIN OF THE SLOW SOLAR WIND K. Fujiki , T. Ohmi, M. Kojima, M. Tokumaru Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University and K. Hakamada Department.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
Solar Wind Helium Abundance and the Minimum Speed of the Solar Wind
Measurements of the Orientation of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Neil Murphy Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
What is the Origin of the Frequently Observed v -5 Suprathermal Charged-Particle Spectrum? J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona Presented at SHINE, Zermatt,
The heliospheric magnetic flux density through several solar cycles Géza Erdős (1) and André Balogh (2) (1) MTA Wigner FK RMI, Budapest, Hungary (2) Imperial.
Long-term measurements of the Sun’s poles show that reversal of the dominant magnetic polarity generally occurs within a year of solar maximum. Current.
The Sun. Sun Fact Sheet The Sun is a normal G2 star, one of more than 100 billion stars in our galaxy. Diameter: 1,390,000 km (Earth 12,742 km or nearly.
Drift Effects if the 22-year Solar Cycle of Cosmic Ray Modulation
Kinetic Effects on Slowly Rotating Magnetic Islands in Tokamaks
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
GROUND-LEVEL EVENT (GLE)
35th International Cosmic Ray Conference
Xuepu Zhao Oct. 19, 2011 The Base of the Heliosphere: The Outer (Inner) Boundary Conditions of Coronal (Heliospheric) models.
Single particle motion and trapped particles
SLIDE SHOW 6. SOLAR WIND (Mariner 2, 1962)
Solar Modulation Davide Grandi AMS Group-INFN Milano-Bicocca.
Large-Scale Solar Magnetic Fields – How is Solar Cycle 24 Different?
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Introduction to Space Weather
Galactic Cosmic Ray Propagation in the 3D Heliosphere
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
Earth and its coordinates
M. D Ngobeni*,1, M. S. Potgieter1
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.
Please contact me at Matthew E. Hill
Xi Luo1, Ming Zhang1, Hamid K. Rassoul1, and N.V. Pogorelov2
  V1 and V2 Measurements of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Outer Heliosphere and the Heliosheath during Solar Cycle #23   W.R. Webber (The.
On the relative role of drift and convection-diffusion effects in the long-term CR variations on the basis of NM and satellite data Lev Dorman (1, 2) Israel.
Jakobus le Roux (1,2) & Gary Webb (1)
International Workshop
Closing the Books on Cycle 24 J
Presentation transcript:

Mariette Hitge, Adri Burger THE EFFECT OF AN AZIMUTHAL-DEPENDENT SOLAR WIND SPEED ON THE MODULATION OF GALACTIC COSMIC RAYS Mariette Hitge, Adri Burger Unit for Space Physics Potchefstroom Campus of North-West University South Africa Today I’ll give a talk on the effect of azimuthal-dependent solar wind speed on the modulation of galactic CR. It is based on work done by myself and my co-worker Adri Burger.

Heliospheric magnetic fields The model used Results OUTLINE Introduction Solar wind speed Heliospheric magnetic fields The model used Results Summary / Conclusions I’ll firstly give an introduction on the talk, describing the purpose of the study. Then I’ll describe the azimuthal solar wind speed used and give the expression for a Parker field with a azimuthal dependent solar wind speed. After that I’ll describe the modulation model that was used to calculate the intensties of the CR. I’ll then show the main results of the study for different solar wind speed scenario’s. Lastly I’ll round the talk off giving the conclusions of the study.

INTRODUCTION 26-day recurrent variations in cosmic ray fluxes up to highest heliographic latitudes (Zhang 1997). Linear relation between latitude gradient and amplitude of 26 day recurrent variations (Zhang 1997). Studied with modulation model using Fisk-Parker hybrid field (Hitge & Burger 2010). This study with modulation model using Parker field with solar wind speed dependent on azimuthal angle. Zhang found recurrent variations in cosmic ray fluxes up to the highest heliographic latitudes for both solar polarity cycles covered by Ulysses, where there are no recurrent solar wind or magnetic field variations. The heliospheric neutral sheet and corotating interaction regions are confined below 40 degrees latitude. Zhang also found a linear relation between the latitude gradient and the amplitude of 26-day recurrent variations in the fluxes of galactic cosmic rays for all species at all latitudes in the inner heliosphere covered by Ulysses and in the equatorial region covered by IMP8 for both solar polarity cycles. This means that particles with large latitude gradients are also strongly modulated by recurrent structures. Or, said in another way: particles whose flux undergo strong short-term variations, will also have a large pole-to-equator flux. These observations also implies that there is a dominant modulation mechanism that control both the global latitudinal distribution and the short-term temporal variation of fluxes. This relation was studied with a modulation model using a Fisk-Parker hybrid field. Results similar to the Zhang-observations was found. In this study the effect of a Parker field with an azimuthal dependent solar wind speed on recurrent variations in protons fluxes, was investigated.

SOLAR WIND SPEED km/s km/s Here the expression for the solar wind speed dependent on azimuthal angle is shown. Theta is co-latitude and phi is the azimuthal angle. The solar wind speed in the polar regions and the average solar wind speed in the equatorial regions are taken to be the same for this study. This was done since the study focused on the effect of an azimuthal dependent solar wind speed only. Omega_A is the amplitude of the variation of the speed as percentage of the average speed. The period of the variation is half a solar rotation. The function fphi restricts the azimuthal dependence to the equatorial region. Larger values of delta corresponds to larger areas where the solar wind is dependent on azimuthal angle. The value for delta was taken as 30 degrees, unless otherwise stated. For a value of 30 degrees, the azimuthal dependence of the solar wind speed is confined to an area of 40 degrees latitude.

MODIFIED PARKER FIELD with This is the expression for a Parker field with a solar wind speed dependent on azimuthal angle. A is the value of the radial component of the magnetic field at Earth, ro the heliocentric radial distance of Earth, rs the heliocentric radial distance of the source surface and Omega the equatorial rotation rate of the Sun. An extra term in the radial component has to be added to ensure that the field is locally and globally divergence free. The sign of this term can be positive or negative dependent on the sign of the derivative of the solar wind speed. The magnitude of the magnetic field change by a maximum of +/- 5% in the outer heliosphere in the equatorial region. In the sketch a pure Parker field line (blue) and a modified Parker field line is drawn for a latitude or 20 degrees and a solar wind speed amplitude of 5%. The effect of the azimuthal dependent solar wind speed is seen clearly.

FISK-PARKER HYBRID FIELD (CONSTANT SOLAR WIND SPEED) with The assumptions that the footpoints of the field lines in the photosphere rotates rigidly with the sun and that the field lines are radially on the source surface, lead to a HMF with spiral field lines lying on cones of constant lat – the Parker field indicated by the blue line. The footpoints of the field lines are actually rotating differentially and the field lines are only coming from coronal holes. Coronal holes are areas on the surface of the sun that appears darker since it is cooler. From these areas, which are mainly in the polar regions of the sun, open field lines emerge and together with it, the fast component of the solar wind. The differential rotation of the footpoints in the photosphere, together with the non-radial expansion of the field lines originating from rigidly rotating polar coronal holes, result in excursions of the field lines in latitude as seen in the sketch – the red line. In these expressions omega is the differential rotation rate of the footpoints (the difference between the rotation rates in the equatorial region and high latitudes), beta is the angle between the axis formed by the field line originating at the heliographic pole, and the rotation axis of the sun, phi* is the azimuthal angle in the coordinate system co-rotating with the sun and Fs is the transition function between the Parker field and the Fisk field. This magnetic field is a mixture of Fisk field and Parker field at high latitudes, a Fisk field at middle and a Parker field in the equatorial region. This field is divergence free for a constant solar wind speed only.

Steady state 3D numerical modulation model of Hattingh & Burger (1995) THE MODULATION MODEL Steady state 3D numerical modulation model of Hattingh & Burger (1995) Spherical symmetric heliosphere Outer boundary 50 AU Outer boundary condition: LIS Diffusion coefficients: QLT and NLGC A steady state, 3D modulation model was used to solve the TPE for galactic protons in a spherical symmetric heliosphere. The outer boundary was set at 50 AU due to computer restrictions and in order to keep the numerical model as simple as possible, since as realistic as possible diffusion coefficients were used. The TS and heliosheath were omitted since it does not have a significant effect on the modulation of protons in the inner heliosphere. The LIS spectrum was set as boundary condition at the outer boundary. The diffusion of CR due to the turbulence of the HMF and the curvature, gradient and NS drift of the CR due to the structure of the HMF, are described by a diffusion tensor including diffusion along and perpendicular to the HMF and drift. A parallel diffusion coefficient following from quasi linear theory, was used. For perpendicular diffusion a coefficient following from nonlinear guiding center theory was used. The drift scale is the Larmor radius of the particle in the weak scattering limit, inverse proportional to the magnitude of the magnetic field.

RESULTS: FISK-PARKER HYBRID FIELD (CONSTANT SOLAR WIND SPEED) Effect of tilt angle of heliospheric neutral sheet In these graphs and the graphs to follow, the relative amplitude of recurrent intensities of protons over one solar rotation is shown as function of latitudinal gradient for both solar polarity cycles. The amplitudes and gradients are calculated for energies ranging from 1 GeV to 10 MeV. The latitudinal gradients are calculated between 0 and 80 degrees latitude at 2 AU. The amplitudes are calculated at latitudes indicated on the graphs and at 2 AU. Here the relative amplitudes and latitudinal gradients are shown for the Fisk-Parker hybrid field for neutral sheet tilt angles of 5 degrees and 10 degrees. These results are in accordance with observations. Recurrent variations in intensity are seen at higher latitudes, beyond latitudes where solar wind and magnetic field variations, the heliospheric neutral sheet and corotating interactions regions, occur. A linear relation is seen for both solar polarities and at all latitudes. At high latitudes the relative amplitudes for the A>0 polarity cycle during which protons drift from the polar regions to the equatorial region, is larger than for the A<0 solar cycle. In the equatorial region the amplitudes are similar for the two polarity cycles.

RESULTS: PARKER FIELD (CONSTANT SOLAR WIND SPEED Effect of tilt angle of heliospheric neutral sheet Here the effect of the tilt angle of the heliospheric neutral sheet for the Parker field with a constant solar wind speed, is shown. When compared with the results for the Fisk-Parker hybrid field, the linear relation is seen clearly for the A<0 solar cycle, but not so clear for the A>0 solar cycle. The relative amplitudes are also much smaller than for the Fisk-Parker hybrid field. The relative amplitudes decrease at higher latitudes for the A<0 solar cycle and almost diminishes for the A>0 solar cycle. It is clear that the Fisk-Parker hybrid field provides the mechanism for producing recurrent intensities at high latitudes as observed, while the Parker field can not.

RESULTS: MODIFIED PARKER FIELD Effect of amplitude of solar wind speed To produce these results, a Parker field with a azimuthal dependent solar wind speed, was used. Here the effect of the amplitude of azimuthal dependence of the solar wind speed, is shown. Near the Earth solar wind speed amplitudes of up to 30 % is seen. If amplitudes larger than 15% is used in this model, it produces negative latitudinal gradients and the linear relation is totally absent. Although a larger amplitude produces larger relative amplitudes, it can not produce recurrent variations in accordance with observations. The largest recurrent variations occur in the equatorial region, diminishing when going to higher latitudes.

RESULTS: MODIFIED PARKER FIELD Effect of area of azimuthal dependence of solar wind speed Here the effect of the area of azimuthal dependence of the solar wind speed, is shown. Although a larger area produces larger relative amplitudes, it also can not produce recurrent variations in accordance with observations. The largest recurrent variations occur in the equatorial region, diminishing when going to higher latitudes.

SUMMARY / CONCLUSIONS The Fisk-Parker hybrid field produces results in accordance with observations: recurrent variations at high latitudes for both solar cycles and linear relation between recurrent variations and latitudinal gradients. The Parker field, even with a azimuthal dependent solar wind speed, can not produce recurrent variations at high latitudes. When studying phenomena averaged over solar rotations, the Fisk-Parker hybrid field and the Parker field give similar results. When studying recurrent variations, a Fisk-like heliospheric magnetic field should be used.

Acknowledgements Adri for inspiring me to put this talk together. Financial support by the South African National Research Foundation is acknowledged

SCHWADRON-PARKER HYBRID FIELD (LATITUDE-DEPENDENT SOLAR WIND SPEED) with The motion of the FPs between the fast and slow SWS regions at the sun create non-spiral configurations and large radial components of the field. The blue line is the PF and the red line the SF. It is clear that when the FP moves from an area of slow SWS to fast SWS, the radial component decreases and the polarity does reverse. It increases when it moves from an area of fast SWS to slow SWS and the polarity doesnot reverse.