Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
Expanding the PP2A Interactome by Defining a B56-Specific SLiM
Near-Atomic Resolution for One State of F-Actin
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Jinwei Zhang, Adrian R. Ferré-D’Amaré  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
The X-Ray Structure of RANTES
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 110, Issue 6, Pages (September 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Crystal Structure of Group II Chaperonin in the Open State
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Gydo C.P. van Zundert, Adrien S.J. Melquiond, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin 
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-I Riboswitch
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 2204-2212 (December 2015) Crystal Structure of the 3.8-MDa Respiratory Supermolecule Hemocyanin at 3.0 Å Resolution  Zuoqi Gai, Asuka Matsuno, Koji Kato, Sanae Kato, Md Rafiqul Islam Khan, Takeshi Shimizu, Takeya Yoshioka, Yuki Kato, Hideki Kishimura, Gaku Kanno, Yoshikatsu Miyabe, Tohru Terada, Yoshikazu Tanaka, Min Yao  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages 2204-2212 (December 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.09.008 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 2204-2212DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.008) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structure of Hemocyanin (A) Overall structure of intact decameric hemocyanin. (B) Structure of a protomer colored according to functional units (FUs). For clarity, protomer B is also shown as gray. Cu2O2 clusters of FU-d∗ are shown as pink balls. (C) Ribbon diagrams of all FUs. Colors correspond to (B). Carbohydrates and the Cu2O2 cluster are shown as spheres. (D) Electron density around the Cu2O2 cluster (stereo representation). The 2Fo-Fc map contoured at 1σ and the anomalous difference Fourier map derived from copper atoms contoured at 7.5σ are shown as dark blue and red, respectively. Cu and O atoms are shown as orange and red spheres, respectively. See also Figures S1–S3 and Tables S1, S2, S3, and S4. Structure 2015 23, 2204-2212DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.008) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of FU Dimer (A) Location of FUs in the protomer-dimer. Each FU is colored according to Figure 1B. (B) Structures of the collar region. Collar region between protomers A, B, C, and D viewed from inside the cylinder. (C) Four types of FU dimers. (D) Structure of the top/bottom parts and middle part of the wall region. Colors correspond to (A). See also Tables S1, S2, and S3. Structure 2015 23, 2204-2212DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.008) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Architecture of Decameric Hemocyanin (Step 1) Two FUs assemble into an FU dimer. (Step 2) Two FU dimers assemble into the dimer of the FU dimer. (Step 3) Three FU dimers corresponding to top, middle, and bottom regions stack on top of each other, resulting in the formation of a parallelogram protomer-dimer. (Step 4) Five protomer-dimers assemble with five-fold symmetry into a decamer, wherein protomer-dimers are stapled by the interprotomer FU-g dimer of the inner collar domain. Structure 2015 23, 2204-2212DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.008) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Location of Conserved Inter-FU interactions (Stereo view) Residues forming hydrogen bonds and ion pairs conserved in all ten equivalent interfaces are shown as red and green spheres, respectively. For clarity, only inter-FU interactions within the FU dimer are shown. The colors of each ribbon diagram correspond to Figure 2A. Structure 2015 23, 2204-2212DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.008) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 FU Structure (A) Representative ribbon diagram of FU-d, colored as a ramp from blue (N terminus) to red (C terminus). The Cu2O2 cluster and carbohydrates are shown as spheres. (B) Close-up view of the copper-binding site (stereo figure). His coordinating with coppers and Cys58 forming a thioether linkage to His60 are shown as green sticks. Residues conserved in both the hemocyanin FUs and pro-tyrosinase are shown as yellow sticks. (C) Highly conserved sulfur-containing residues surrounding the Cu2O2-binding site (pink sticks). See also Figures S2, S4, and S5. Structure 2015 23, 2204-2212DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.008) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Carbohydrates and Their Effect (A) Glycans on the hemocyanin decamer. Carbohydrates are shown as spheres. (B) Effect of glycosidase treatment on decamer reassociation. Reassociation efficiency of dissociated hemocyanin subunits treated or untreated with glycosidase F was compared. The number of untreated hemocyanins was set to 100%. The error bars represent SD. ∗p < 0.01, Student’s t test. (C) Time dependency of the number of decamers in the absence (gray bars) or presence (white bars) of glucose. The error bars represent SD. ∗p < 0.01, Student’s t test. (D) Close-up view of the carbohydrate cluster. Carbohydrates are shown as balls and sticks. Loops interacting between FUs are indicated by a black arrow. See also Figures S2 and S6, and Table S4. Structure 2015 23, 2204-2212DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.09.008) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions