Cost-effectiveness model of endoscopic screening and surveillance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease  Lauren B. Gerson, Peter W. Groeneveld,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Celiac Disease Genetics: Current Concepts and Practical Applications Ludvig M. Sollid, Benedicte A. Lie Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Volume.
Advertisements

Masatoshi Kudo  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
From: Upper Endoscopy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Best Practice Advice From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
Effect of chronic intake of NSAIDs and cyclooxygenase 2—selective inhibitors on esophageal cancer incidence  Marc Bardou, Alan N. Barkun, Joumana Ghosn,
Hisashi Moriguchi, Makoto Kobayashi, Raymond T. Chung, Chifumi Sato 
Noncardiac Chest Pain Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Double-Balloon Endoscopy
Survival of Patients With Superficial Esophageal Adenocarcinoma After Endoscopic Treatment vs Surgery  Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Herbert C. Wolfsen, Michael.
Biomarkers of Reflux Disease
Chad A. Morse, Stuart F. Quan, Mary Z
Volume 144, Issue 1, Pages e6 (January 2013)
Serhat Bor, Gul Kitapcioglu, Peter Dettmar, Tim Baxter 
Short-Bowel Syndrome Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume 155, Issue 4, Pages (October 2018)
Diagnosing autoimmune hepatitis in children: Is the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group scoring system useful?  Regan L. Ebbeson, Richard A. Schreiber 
Volume 153, Issue 3, Pages e16-e17 (September 2017)
Seth D. Crockett, A. Sidney Barritt, Nicholas J. Shaheen 
Andree Koop, Michael J. Bartel, Dawn Francis 
Genetics of Colonic Polyposis
A Cost-Utility Analysis of Ablative Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus
Endoscopy 20 Years Into the Future
Ikuo Hirano, Qing Zhang, John E. Pandolfino, Peter J. Kahrilas 
Eighty-Year-Old Patient With History of a Twelve Millimeter Adenomatous Polyp Resected at Age of Seventy-Five Years  David Lieberman  Clinical Gastroenterology.
Heartburn severity underestimates erosive esophagitis severity in elderly patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease  David A. Johnson, M.Brian Fennerty 
Erythropoietic Growth Factors for Treatment-Induced Anemia in Hepatitis C: A Cost- Effectiveness Analysis  Brennan M.R. Spiegel, Kristina Chen, Chiun–Fang.
Endoscopic Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus
Aaron P. Thrift, PhD  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Novel Endoscopic Therapeutics for Early Gastric Cancer
Severe Constipation Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Management strategies for dysphagia with a normal-appearing esophagus
Sameer D. Saini, Akbar K. Waljee, Peter D.R. Higgins 
William D. Leslie  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After a Negative Screening Endoscopy  Mohammad H. Shakhatreh,
Roxana M. Coman, MD, PhD  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 
Effect of chronic intake of NSAIDs and cyclooxygenase 2—selective inhibitors on esophageal cancer incidence  Marc Bardou, Alan N. Barkun, Joumana Ghosn,
Jianguang Ji, Kari Hemminki  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Parameters on Esophageal pH-Impedance Monitoring That Predict Outcomes of Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease  Amit Patel, Gregory S. Sayuk,
David H. Bruining, William J. Sandborn 
Amnon Sonnenberg  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Peter Bytzer  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Cost Effectiveness of Alternative Surveillance Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis  Karin L. Andersson, Joshua A. Salomon,
Colorectal Cancer Screening: How to Stop a Moving Target
Effects of Different Coping Strategies on Physical and Mental Health of Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome  Lilian Dindo, PhD  Clinical Gastroenterology.
Cost-effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with hepatitis C virus–related cirrhosis  Derek Patel, Norah A. Terrault, Francis.
Esophageal variceal bleeding: Primary prophylaxis
The Utility of Intraluminal Impedance in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease–Like Symptoms But Normal Endoscopy and 24-Hour pH Testing  Michael.
Chronic Diarrhea Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Endoscopic Ultrasound and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Features of a Non–Protein Losing Form of Ménétrier's Disease  Ferga C. Gleeson, Thomas F. Mangan,
Endoscopic Screening for Gastric Cancer
Value of extended recording time with wireless pH monitoring in evaluating gastroesophageal reflux disease  Chandra Prakash, Ray E. Clouse  Clinical Gastroenterology.
Issue Highlights Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Cost Utility of Screening for Barrett’s Esophagus With Esophageal Capsule Endoscopy Versus Conventional Upper Endoscopy  Joel H. Rubenstein, John M. Inadomi,
Severe irritable bowel and functional abdominal pain syndromes: Managing the patient and health care costs  George F. Longstreth, Douglas A. Drossman 
Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Chronic Crohn's Colitis: Results of a Surveillance Program Spanning 25 Years  Sonia Friedman, Peter H. Rubin,
Hepatitis C Virus Infection, Age, and Hispanic Ethnicity Increase Mortality From Liver Cancer in the United States  Zobair M. Younossi, Maria Stepanova 
A 27-Year-Old Woman With Constipation: Diagnosis and Treatment
Patrick Yachimski, William P. Puricelli, Norman S. Nishioka 
Lauren B. Gerson, Peter J. Kahrilas, Ronnie Fass 
Chromoendoscopy and Magnifying Endoscopy for Barrett’s Esophagus
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (May 2010)
Projected National Impact of Colorectal Cancer Screening on Clinical and Economic Outcomes and Health Services Demand  Uri Ladabaum, Kenneth Song  Gastroenterology 
David S. Fefferman, Richard J. Farrell 
Masatoshi Kudo  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Cost-effectiveness model of endoscopic screening and surveillance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease  Lauren B. Gerson, Peter W. Groeneveld,
Scott K. Fung, Anna S.F. Lok  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
Hisashi Moriguchi, Makoto Kobayashi, Raymond T. Chung, Chifumi Sato 
Barrett’s Esophagus in Women: Demographic Features and Progression to High-Grade Dysplasia and Cancer  Gary W. Falk, Prashanthi N. Thota, Joel E. Richter,
Medical Therapy for Refractory Pediatric Crohn’s Disease
Clinical, Radiologic, and Manometric Characteristics of Chronic Intestinal Dysmotility: The Stanford Experience  Lucilene Rosa-e-Silva, Lauren B. Gerson,
Presentation transcript:

Cost-effectiveness model of endoscopic screening and surveillance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease  Lauren B. Gerson, Peter W. Groeneveld, George Triadafilopoulos  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology  Volume 2, Issue 10, Pages 868-879 (October 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00394-5 Copyright © 2004 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Markov model showing possible transitions between health states. Circular arrows represent states in which a patient can remain permanently. Patients cycle between transition states until death occurs. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2004 2, 868-879DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00394-5) Copyright © 2004 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Incremental cost versus life-years gained. Number of life-years is expressed as gain in life-years over the base-case strategy. a = no screening, low treatment intensity; b = no screening, moderate treatment intensity; c = surveillance for dysplasia, low treatment intensity; d = surveillance for dysplasia, moderate treatment intensity; e = surveillance for nondysplasia, low treatment intensity; f = surveillance for dysplasia, moderate to high treatment intensity; g = surveillance for nondysplasia, moderate treatment intensity; h = surveillance for dysplasia, high treatment intensity; i = surveillance for nondysplasia, moderate treatment intensity; j = surveillance for nondysplasia, high treatment intensity. The line represents the line of optimality between data points. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2004 2, 868-879DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00394-5) Copyright © 2004 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Results from 1-way sensitivity analysis. Parameters associated with the greatest variation in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios include age at time of screening, cost of endoscopy, and resectability of esophageal cancer. PDT, photodynamic therapy; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2004 2, 868-879DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00394-5) Copyright © 2004 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of age of screening endoscopy on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2004 2, 868-879DOI: (10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00394-5) Copyright © 2004 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions