Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages (June 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Advertisements

Fig. 7 Localization of the element(s) responsible for the transcriptional suppression by PPAR-γ. A, Rat VSMCs were transfected with either −1969/+104-luc,
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
Harald D. Rupprecht, M.D, Yoshitaka Akagi, Annette Keil, Gerhard Hofer 
UVB Increases Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) Expression1  Christoph Marschall, Toshiko Nobutoh, Evelyn Braungart, Kathrin Douwes,
Mira Park, Ph. D. , Dae-Shik Suh, M. D. , Kangseok Lee, Ph. D
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
by Hong Hao, Huiling Qi, and Manohar Ratnam
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Requirement of heat shock protein 90 in mesangial cell mitogenesis
The homeodomain protein Cdx2 regulates lactase gene promoter activity during enterocyte differentiation  Rixun Fang, Nilda A. Santiago, Lynne C. Olds,
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
IFN-γ Upregulates Expression of the Mouse Complement C1rA Gene in Keratinocytes via IFN-Regulatory Factor-1  Sung June Byun, Ik-Soo Jeon, Hyangkyu Lee,
The interferon regulatory factor ICSBP/IRF-8 in combination with PU
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Sp1 Is Required for Glucose-Induced Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 Gene  Tao Li, Liqun Bai, Jing Li, Suzu Igarashi,
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages (June 2002)
HDAC Activity Is Required for p65/RelA-Dependent Repression of PPARδ-Mediated Transactivation in Human Keratinocytes  Lene Aarenstrup, Esben Noerregaard.
Volume 136, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 75, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Yin-Yang 1 Negatively Regulates the Differentiation-Specific Transcription of Mouse Loricrin Gene in Undifferentiated Keratinocytes  Xuezhu Xu, Yasuhiro.
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Harald D. Rupprecht, M.D, Yoshitaka Akagi, Annette Keil, Gerhard Hofer 
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Histamine Inhibits the Production of Interferon-induced Protein of 10 kDa in Human Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Melanoma  Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe 
Noritaka Oyama, Keiji Iwatsuki, Yoshimi Homma, Fumio Kaneko 
Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor Enhances Whereas Prostaglandin E2Inhibits the Production of Interferon-Induced Protein of 10 kDa in Epidermoid Carcinoma A431 
Keratinocyte growth factor promotes goblet cell differentiation through regulation of goblet cell silencer inhibitor  Dai Iwakiri, Daniel K. Podolsky 
A Novel Role of Transforming Growth Factor β1 in Transcriptional Repression of Human Cholesterol 7α-Hydroxylase Gene  Tiangang Li, John Y.L. Chiang  Gastroenterology 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
17β-estradiol Inhibits the Production of RANTES in Human Keratinocytes
Volume 126, Issue 7, Pages (June 2004)
Romain Debret, Richard R
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Regulation of the Melanoma Cell Adhesion Molecule Gene in Melanoma: Modulation of mRNA Synthesis by Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate, Phorbol Ester, and.
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Klotho is a target gene of PPAR-γ
Volume 128, Issue 7, Pages (June 2005)
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Bile acids regulate the ontogenic expression of ileal bile acid binding protein in the rat via the farnesoid X receptor  Sandy T. Hwang, Nancy L. Urizar,
Defining the Regulatory Elements in the Proximal Promoter of ΔNp63 in Keratinocytes: Potential Roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63  Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara.
Suppression of VEGFR2 Expression in Human Endothelial Cells by Dimethylfumarate Treatment: Evidence for Anti-Angiogenic Action  Markus Meissner, Monika.
TNF Regulates the In Vivo Occupancy of Both Distal and Proximal Regulatory Regions of the MCP-1/JE Gene  Dongsheng Ping, Peter L. Jones, Jeremy M. Boss 
Transcriptional Regulation of AKT Activation by E2F
Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages (December 2001)
Endogenous GATA Factors Bind the Core Sequence of the tetO and Influence Gene Regulation with the Tetracycline System  David J. Gould, Yuti Chernajovsky 
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
The Vitamin D Response Element of the Involucrin Gene Mediates its Regulation by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3  Daniel D. Bikle, Dean Ng, Yuko Oda, Karen Hanley,
Active Repression of Antiapoptotic Gene Expression by RelA(p65) NF-κB
Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Scatter Factor (HGF/SF) Induces Vascular Permeability Factor (VPF/VEGF) Expression by Cultured Keratinocytes  Jens Gille, Mona.
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Keiji Miyazawa, MSc, Akio Mori, MD, PhD, Hirokazu Okudaira, MD, PhD 
Chih-Yung S. Lee, Tzu-Lan Yeh, Bridget T. Hughes, Peter J. Espenshade 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages 1926-1940 (June 2003) FXR induces the UGT2B4 enzyme in hepatocytes: a potential mechanism of negative feedback control of FXR activity  Olivier Barbier, Ines Pineda Torra, Audrey Sirvent, Thierry Claudel, Christophe Blanquart, Daniel Duran-Sandoval, Folkert Kuipers, Vladimir Kosykh, Jean-Charles Fruchart, Bart Staels  Gastroenterology  Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages 1926-1940 (June 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3

Figure 1 Bile acids increase UGT2B4 mRNA levels in primary human hepatocytes. Primary human hepatocytes were treated for 24 hours with ethanol (vehicle) or chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA; 30 μmol/L). (A ) Northern blot analysis of human UGT2B mRNA (36B4 RNA was measured as control). (B) Semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses of the human UGT2B isoforms (28S RNA was measured as control). C, RT-PCR negative control. (C ) Real-time RT-PCR analysis of UGT2B4 RNA. Values are expressed as means ± SD (n = 6) relative to the control set as 1. Statistically significant differences between vehicle- and CDCA-treated cells are indicated by asterisks (Mann-Whitney test: ∗∗∗P < 0.001). Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)

Figure 2 Bile acid and synthetic FXR agonists induce UGT2B4 gene expression in human hepatoblastoma HepG2 cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner via a direct transcriptional mechanism. (A ) HepG2 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of CDCA (10, 25, and 50 μmol/L) or vehicle (ethanol) for 24 hours. (B) HepG2 cells were incubated with CDCA (50 μmol/L) or vehicle (ethanol) for 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours. (C ) HepG2 cells were incubated for 24 hours with ethanol (vehicle) or CDCA (50 μmol/L) in the absence and presence of cycloheximide (CHX; 20 μg/mL) or actinomycin D (Act. D; 1 μg/mL). (D) Cells were incubated for 24 hours with vehicle (ethanol), CDCA (50 μmol/L), or GW4064 (5 μmol/L). RNA levels were measured by real-time (bars) or semiquantitative (ethidium bromide-stained gels) RT-PCR. Values are means ± SD (n = 6). Statistically significant differences between vehicle- and FXR agonist-treated cells are indicated by asterisks (Mann-Whitney test: ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant). Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)

Figure 3 Bile acids increase UGT2B protein levels and activity in HepG2 cells. (A ) HepG2 cells were incubated with vehicle (ethanol) or CDCA (50 μmol/L) for 36 hours. Microsomal proteins were subsequently purified and immunoblotted with an anti-UGT2B antibody (upper panel). Equal loading of protein in each lane was assessed by Ponceau S staining (lower panel). (B) HepG2 cells were incubated for 36 hours with CDCA (50 μmol/L) or vehicle (ethanol). Cell homogenates (100 μg) were incubated with [14C ]UDPGA (15 μmol/L), unlabeled UDPGA (485 μmol/L), and hyodeoxycholic acid (HDCA; 200 μmol/L) for 8 hours at 37°C. Radiolabeled HDCA/glucuronide was subsequently analyzed by thin-layer chromatography and quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. Values represent means ± SD (n = 3). Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)

Figure 4 Identification of a bile acid response element (B4-BARE) in the human UGT2B4 promoter. (A ) HepG2 cells were transfected with the indicated human UGT2B4 promoter-driven luciferase (Luc) reporter plasmids (100 ng) in the absence or presence of pcDNA3-hFXR (30 ng) and a cytomegalovirus-driven β-galactosidase expression plasmid (pCMV-β-gal; 50 ng). Cells were subsequently treated with CDCA (50 μmol/L) or vehicle for 24 hours. (B) HepG2 cells were transfected with the indicated plasmids (100 ng) containing 3 copies of the wild-type or mutated B4-BARE upstream of the thymidine kinase (TK) minimal promoter-driven luciferase reporter (TKpGL3) and pCMV-β-gal (50 ng) and in the absence or presence of hFXR (30 ng). Cells were subsequently treated with CDCA (50 μmol/L) or vehicle for 24 hours. Values are expressed as -fold induction of controls (pGL3 or TKpGL3) set at 1, normalized to internal β-galactosidase activity as described in Materials and Methods. Values represent the means ± SD. Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)

Figure 5 FXR binds the B4-BARE as a monomer. (A ) Electromobility shift assays (EMSA) were performed with end-labeled consensus IR-1 or B4-BAREwt oligonucleotides in the presence of RXR, FXR, both RXR and FXR, or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate, as indicated. Supershift experiments were performed with anti-FXR antibody (0.2 μg). (B) EMSA assays were performed on radiolabeled B4-BAREwt and B4-BAREmt oligonucleotides by using in vitro transcribed/translated RXR (lanes 2 and 6), FXR (lanes 3 and 7 ), both RXR and FXR (lanes 4 and 8 ), or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate (lanes 1 and 5 ). (C ) Competition EMSAs on B4-BAREwt as radiolabeled probe were performed by adding 1-, 10-, 50-, or 100-fold molar excess of the indicated cold IR-1, B4-BAREwt, or B4-BAREmt oligonucleotides in EMSA and FXR, RXR, FXR and RXR, or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. (D) Soluble chromatin was prepared from HepG2 cells treated with vehicle (ethanol) or CDCA (50 μmol/L) for 6 hours and immunoprecipitated with antibodies directed against FXR and RXR or with anti-UGT2B antibody as a negative control. The final DNA extractions were amplified by using pairs of primers covering the B4-BARE, a distal region of the UGT2B4 gene promoter, or the β-actin gene as negative control. As a positive control for FXR/RXR binding, a 235-bp DNA fragment encompassing the IR-1 of the SHP gene promoter was amplified. (E ) EMSAs were performed on end-labeled B4-BAREwt oligonucleotides by using in vitro transcribed/translated FXR (lane 1 ), both RXR and FXR (lanes 2 and 3 ), or 2.5 μg of nuclear extract from immortalized human hepatocytes (IHH-NE) (lanes 4 and 5 ). Supershift analyses were performed by adding the anti-FXR antibody (lanes 3 and 5 ). Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)

Figure 5 FXR binds the B4-BARE as a monomer. (A ) Electromobility shift assays (EMSA) were performed with end-labeled consensus IR-1 or B4-BAREwt oligonucleotides in the presence of RXR, FXR, both RXR and FXR, or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate, as indicated. Supershift experiments were performed with anti-FXR antibody (0.2 μg). (B) EMSA assays were performed on radiolabeled B4-BAREwt and B4-BAREmt oligonucleotides by using in vitro transcribed/translated RXR (lanes 2 and 6), FXR (lanes 3 and 7 ), both RXR and FXR (lanes 4 and 8 ), or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate (lanes 1 and 5 ). (C ) Competition EMSAs on B4-BAREwt as radiolabeled probe were performed by adding 1-, 10-, 50-, or 100-fold molar excess of the indicated cold IR-1, B4-BAREwt, or B4-BAREmt oligonucleotides in EMSA and FXR, RXR, FXR and RXR, or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate. (D) Soluble chromatin was prepared from HepG2 cells treated with vehicle (ethanol) or CDCA (50 μmol/L) for 6 hours and immunoprecipitated with antibodies directed against FXR and RXR or with anti-UGT2B antibody as a negative control. The final DNA extractions were amplified by using pairs of primers covering the B4-BARE, a distal region of the UGT2B4 gene promoter, or the β-actin gene as negative control. As a positive control for FXR/RXR binding, a 235-bp DNA fragment encompassing the IR-1 of the SHP gene promoter was amplified. (E ) EMSAs were performed on end-labeled B4-BAREwt oligonucleotides by using in vitro transcribed/translated FXR (lane 1 ), both RXR and FXR (lanes 2 and 3 ), or 2.5 μg of nuclear extract from immortalized human hepatocytes (IHH-NE) (lanes 4 and 5 ). Supershift analyses were performed by adding the anti-FXR antibody (lanes 3 and 5 ). Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)

Figure 6 RXR activation reduces the bile acid-induced up-regulation of UGT2B4 in HepG2 cells. (A ) EMSAs were performed with the radiolabeled B4-BAREwt oligonucleotide in the presence of RXR (lane 2 ), FXR (lane 3 ), FXR and RXR (lane 4 ), FXRLeu433Arg (lane 5 ), FXRLeu433Arg and RXR (lane 6 ), or unprogrammed reticulocyte lysate (lane 1 ). (B) Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments on DNA from HepG2 cells treated with CDCA (50 μmol/L), CD4064 (2.5 μmol/L), both CDCA and CD4064, or vehicle (ethanol) for 6 hours. Soluble chromatin was prepared as described in Materials and Methods and immunoprecipitated with anti-FXR, anti-RXR, or anti-UGT2B antibodies. The extracted DNA was amplified with pairs of primers that cover B4-BARE, a distal region of the UGT2B4 gene promoter, or the β-actin gene as a negative control. As a positive control, a 235-bp DNA fragment encompassing the IR-1 of the SHP gene promoter was amplified. (C ) HepG2 cells were transfected with the TK-pGL3 reporter plasmid or the TK-pGL3 plasmid containing 3 copies of the B4-BARE and pCMV-β-gal in the absence or presence of FXR, FXRLeu433Arg, and/or RXR. Cells were subsequently treated with CDCA (50 μmol/L) or vehicle (ethanol) for 24 hours. (D and E ) HepG2 cells were treated with vehicle (ethanol), CDCA (50 μmol/L), CD3640 (2.5 μmol/L), or both CDCA and CD3640 for 24 hours. Total RNA was extracted, and UGT2B4 (D) and SHP (E ) mRNA levels were measured by real-time PCR. Values are means ± SD (n = 4). Values followed by different letters are statistically significantly different (analysis of variance followed by the Mann-Whitney test; P < 0.05). Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)

Figure 7 UGT2B4 overexpression in HepG2 cells interferes negatively with the bile acid induction of SHP gene expression. Stable overexpressing UGT2B4- and UGT1A6-HepG2 cells were obtained as described in Materials and Methods. Cells were treated with vehicle (ethanol) or CDCA (50 μmol/L) for 24 hours. Levels of SHP, UGT2B4, and UGT1A6 mRNAs were analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PR (A ) and quantified with real-time RT-PCR (B). Statistically significant differences of SHP mRNA levels between vehicle- and FXR agonist-treated cells are indicated by asterisks (Mann-Whitney test; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ns, not significant). Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)

Figure 8 CDCA-induced UGT2B4 expression is delayed compared with SHP in HepG2 cells. HepG2 cells were incubated with CDCA or ethanol for 6, 12, and 24 hours. RNA levels were measured by real-time RT-PCR. Values are means ± SD (n = 4). Statistically significant differences between UGT2B4 and SHP inductions are indicated by asterisks (Mann-Whitney test; ∗∗P < 0.005; ∗∗∗P < 0.001). Gastroenterology 2003 124, 1926-1940DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00388-3)