Patient Forum Pack May 2019 This report refers to May 2019 (M2) data unless otherwise stated All data is based on LONDON Clinical Commissioning Groups.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Information & Performance Cells. Performance Cell Who are we? West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust 5.4 million population Over 5000 square.
Advertisements

Performance PLG 3 rd August, 2011 Richard Wells, Head of Knowledge & Intelligence Performance Report.
Partnership Board Progress Reports 2010/11 Alison Copeland Gyles Glover Supported by the Department of Health.
Data Pack. Keogh – key messages The number of GP consultations has risen over recent years and, despite rapid expansion and usage of alternative urgent.
NAME – Council of Governors. What is swasft? We provide emergency, urgent and unscheduled care We are a Foundation Trust (March 2011) – aliened Acquired.
Board Report – Performance June 2009 Produced by Business Intelligence (Performance)
An EMS Medley August 8, Agenda Background Case Studies Key Findings.
London Ambulance Service – calls Number of Category A calls to London Ambulance Service from City and Hackney residents has increased: from 1340 in 2011/12.
The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust NWL JOINT HEALTH OVERVIEW & SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 14th October 2015.
Monthly Market Watch for Maricopa County An overview of what is happening in the Maricopa County real estate market (using January 2011 statistics) Provided.
Development of a Community Stroke Rehabilitation Team “meeting the need” NHS Blackburn with Darwen Tracy Walker Team Leader.
Healthy Liverpool. Five areas of transformation “Not just physical activity, other factors have to be considered, loneliness, deprivation, housing conditions,
West Yorkshire Sustainability and Transformation Plan An overview September 2016.
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
East Midlands Ambulance Service
Election briefing: Quality of care in the English NHS
Process Control Charts
Accessing health information in the UK
Modelling health systems: How health data and simulation can help inform the redesign of our NHS services Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health.
The Second Patient Report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit
Q & A Overview of the Coalition Surge Test (CST)
Emergency Inter-Hospital Transfer (Protocol 37)
Published Reports The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Financial Recovery Plan February 2015 (Month 10 reporting)
Sheffield Performance Overview
Cervical Screening Programme, England, : Graphs
Urgent and emergency care service review
Published Reports The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN)
Maternity and Neonatal, Skin, Vision and Hearing Deep Dive Workshop Understanding “what to change” using the NHS Right Care methodology Part of the NEW.
Executive Summary – CCG Assurance Framework
17 September 2018 Gender Pay Gap Report Publication Date: March 2018.
MST Evaluation April 2016.
FRACTURED NECK OF FEMUR
Ambulance Response Programme (ARP)
Annual General Meeting
Ambulance Response Programme
South Tyneside Urgent and Emergency Care Equity Audit
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
Clinical audit 2017/18 National Results
Climate Graphs What do they tell us?.
Devon & Cornwall Police Authority Performance Management Committee
Clinical audit 2017/18 National Results
Emergency flow improvement tool
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ambulance Response Programme - Key Metric Variance
Neurological Services Deep Dive Workshop Understanding “what to change” using the NHS Right Care methodology Part of the NEW Devon Way.
Patient Forum Pack September 2018
CQC and Performance Update
Trust Performance Update
Developing a Sustainability and Transformation Plan
Pancreas Program Functional Inactivity
National Ambulance Service (NAS) Martin Dunne Director NAS
London Ambulance Service
Ambulance Response Programme
National Early Warning Scores: National Ambulance Survey Headline Findings South West April 2018.
FRACTURED NECK OF FEMUR
NHS Blackburn with Darwen Clinical Commissioning Group
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Which is best value for money?
Developing Urgent and Emergency Care Using Digital Technology
National Early Warning Scores: National Ambulance Survey Headline Findings West of England April 2018.
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
London Ambulance Service
Monthly Performance Report
Healthy Hearts and Kick It
Leadership and Safety Culture Across a Complex System
NWAS Presentation to Greater Manchester Health Scrutiny Committee
Discovery In Action Investigating variation in BADS Same Day Surgery rates in a Health Board.
SWCU Annual Report England
LAS and the Inverse Care Law
Presentation transcript:

Patient Forum Pack May 2019 This report refers to May 2019 (M2) data unless otherwise stated All data is based on LONDON Clinical Commissioning Groups only, unless otherwise stated.

Ambulance Response Programme – Definition & Overview EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Ambulance Response Programme – Definition & Overview Category Percentage of calls per Category National Standard How long does the ambulance service have to make a decision? What stops the clock? Category 1 8% 7 minutes mean response time 15 minutes 90th centile response time The earliest of: The problem being identified An ambulance response being dispatched 30 seconds from the call being connected The first emergency vehicle that arrives on scene stops the clock (there is an additional Category 1 transport standard to ensure that these patients also receive early ambulance transportation). Category 2 48% 18 minutes mean response time 40 minutes 90th centile response time An ambulance response being dispatched 240 seconds from the call being connected If a patient is transported by an emergency vehicle, only the arrival of the transporting vehicle stops the clock. If the patient does not need transport, the first emergency vehicle arriving at the scene of the incident stops the clock. Category 3 34% 60 minutes mean response time 120 minutes 90th centile response time Category 4 10% 180 minutes 90th centile response time Category 4T: If a patient is transported by an emergency vehicle, only the arrival of the transporting vehicle stops the clock. The new standards are intended to: Prioritise the sickest patients quickly to ensure they receive the fastest response. Ensure national response targets to apply to every patient for the first time – so ending ‘hidden waits’ for patients in lower categories. Ensure more equitable response for patients across the call categories. Improve care for stroke and heart attack patients through sending the right resource first time. Due to the nature and impact of these changes, the previous performance measures are not comparable. However, NHS England have published National Standard for a number of the key measures which are included here.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Performance Summary Demand Performance A total of 98,542 incidents were provided with a face to face response. An increase of 1.9% compared to the previous month. Category 1 incidents reached a total of 12,022, an increase of 4.9% compared to the previous month. Category 2 incidents reached a total of 58,041, an increase of 1.6% compared to the previous month. M2 saw seven of the nine key measures perform within the National Standards. The YTD position shows LAS performed within the National Standard for seven of the nine response time measures. Despite seven response time measures increasing marginally in M2 compared to M1, seven of the nine remained within the National Standards. * Incident data is correct as of 10th June and is subject to change due to data validation.

Response Times by Category Performance Overview Response Times by Category Category 1 The NEW Category 1 (C1) measure is expected to comprise of approximately 8% of all incidents and covers a wider range of conditions than the former Red 1 category. These are to be responded to within an average time of seven minutes. Fig 1.1 shows the time taken to respond to patients triaged as Category 1 (C1) The grey line shows the LAS 90th centile response time. The dotted grey line shows the National Standard of 15 minutes 90th centile response time. The blue line shows the LAS monthly average (mean) response time The dotted blue line shows the National Standard of 7 minutes average (mean) response time. Fig 1.1 Category 2 The NEW Category 2 (C2) measure is expected to comprise of approximately 48% of all incidents. These are to be responded to within an average time of 18 minutes. Fig 1.2 shows the response time for patients triaged as Category 2 (C2) The grey line shows the LAS 90th centile response time. The dotted grey line shows the National Standard of 40 minutes 90th centile response time. The blue line shows the LAS monthly average (mean) response time The dotted blue line shows the National Standard of 18 minutes average (mean) response time. Fig 1.2

Response Times by Category Performance Overview Response Times by Category Category 3 The NEW Category 3 (C3) measure is expected to comprise of approximately 34% of all incidents. Fig 1.3 shows the time taken to respond to patients triaged as Category 3 (C3) The grey line shows the LAS 90th centile response time. The dotted grey line shows the National Standard of 120 minutes (2 hours) 90th centile response time. The blue line shows the LAS monthly average (mean) response time. The dotted blue line shows the National Standard of 60 minutes (1 hour) average (mean) response time. Fig 1.3 Category 4 The NEW Category 4 (C4) measure is expected to comprise of approximately 10% of all incidents. Fig 1.4 shows the response time for patients triaged as Category 4 (C4) The grey line shows the LAS 90th centile response time. The dotted grey line shows the National Standard of 180 minutes (3 hours) 90th centile response time. The blue line shows the LAS monthly average (mean) response time. There is no National Standard the mean response time. Fig 1.4

Performance Overview Key Metric Variation

Performance Overview Benchmarking - National Picture (MONTH 2) Fig 4.2

Performance by CCG & STP Performance Overview Performance by CCG & STP These tables shows key performance measures profiled by STP. All STPs continued to perform within the 7 minute national standard for the C1 Mean. Despite a marginal increase in the C3 Mean, four of the five STPs performed within the National Standard. The South East and South West STPs, continue to perform well in six of the seven key measures. The C1 and C2 90th Centile response times also continue to perform within the National Standards across all STPs. Ambulance Turnaround The Patient Handover to Green measure demonstrates the percentage of handovers within 15 minutes This table opposite shows the Data Completeness for Ambulance Turnarounds for the previous 11 months and the Year To Date position. Ambulance Turnaround (M1) (M2) (M3) (M4) (M5) (M6) (M7) (M8) (M9) (M10) (M11) (M12) YTD 2018/19 Patient Handover to Green (within 15 mins) 56.87% 55.99% Data Completeness (arrival) 99.99% 99.91% Data Completeness (green) 99.96%

Performance Overview Performance by CCG & STP

Performance Overview Performance by CCG & STP

Call Answering Performance Performance Overview Call Answering Performance Fig 5.1 Fig 5.2 Figure 5.1 demonstrates three key measures for call answering under the Ambulance Response Programme (ARP). 134,864 calls were received into the EOC in May 2019 (M2). 263,510 calls have been received into the EOC for the YTD. During M2 the median call answering was zero seconds. This means 50% or half of all calls received into the Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) were answered immediately. The 95th centile was 38 seconds. In other words 95 out of every 100 calls were answered in less than 38 seconds. The graph continues to show a positive downward trend. Figure 5.2 shows the percentage of calls answered within five seconds. 98,542 incidents received a face-to-face response in May 2019 (M2). 195,213 incidents received a face-to-face response for the YTD. The new ARP standards no longer use this performance measure and for that reason there is longer a requirement to report it. However, to illustrate the graph shows the daily call taking performance in the month. In M2 90% of all calls received into the EOC were answered within five seconds. The graph continues to show a positive upward trend. * Incident data is correct as of 10th June and is subject to change due to data validation.

Hospital Handover Summary Hospital Conveyance Lost Hours

Resource Levels Plan vs. Actual * Including MRU ^ ORH plan Fig 6.1 Figure 6.1 shows a breakdown of resource levels, in patient facing vehicle hours. The Planned Resource Level is the ORH plan for patient facing vehicle hours. This is profiled by responder type. The Current Resource Level (GRS) are the actual patient facing hours produced profiled by responder type. The Current Resource Gap is shown to demonstrate the gap in resourcing for these responder types each month. GRS data shows scheduled hours and as such it does not include pre or post shift overtime hours. * Including MRU ^ ORH plan