Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (February 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genome Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
Advertisements

Targeted Disruption of V600E-Mutant BRAF Gene by CRISPR-Cpf1
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Imprinting-Mutation Mechanisms in Prader-Willi Syndrome
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Figure S1. Analysis of the embryo edited using gRNA-2 and HF2-BE2
Ane Y. Schmidt, Thomas v. O. Hansen, Lise B
Yuming Lu, Jian-Kang Zhu  Molecular Plant 
Penetrance of Craniofacial Anomalies in Mouse Models of Smith-Magenis Syndrome Is Modified by Genomic Sequence Surrounding Rai1: Not All Null Alleles.
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Identification of a Frameshift Mutation in Osterix in a Patient with Recessive Osteogenesis Imperfecta  Pablo Lapunzina, Mona Aglan, Samia Temtamy, José.
Volume 74, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Malte Spielmann, Francesco Brancati, Peter M. Krawitz, Peter N
Volume 161, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
CRISPR/Cas9 Technology–Based Xenograft Tumors as Candidate Reference Materials for Multiple EML4-ALK Rearrangements Testing  Rongxue Peng, Rui Zhang,
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Correction of a Genetic Disease in Mouse via Use of CRISPR-Cas9
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Figure 1. Generation of the S250F Aadc mutant mice
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
A CRISPR Connection between Chromatin Topology and Genetic Disorders
Molecular Cytogenetic Evidence for a Common Breakpoint in the Largest Inverted Duplications of Chromosome 15  A.E. Wandstrat, J. Leana-Cox, L. Jenkins,
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
Mouse Genome Engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 for Study of Immune Function
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Genome Engineering with CRISPR-Cas9 in the Mosquito Aedes aegypti
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
USH2A Gene Editing Using the CRISPR System
Supplemental Figure 3 A B C T-DNA 1 2 RGLG1 2329bp 3 T-DNA 1 2 RGLG2
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Simultaneous Reprogramming and Gene Correction of Patient Fibroblasts
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Julien Ablain, Ellen M. Durand, Song Yang, Yi Zhou, Leonard I. Zon 
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
TALEN Gene Knockouts Reveal No Requirement for the Conserved Human Shelterin Protein Rap1 in Telomere Protection and Length Regulation  Shaheen Kabir,
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
A DNA Replication Mechanism for Generating Nonrecurrent Rearrangements Associated with Genomic Disorders  Jennifer A. Lee, Claudia M.B. Carvalho, James.
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
WRKY20 dual sgRNA approach.
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (July 2017)
Complete Haplotype Sequence of the Human Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Variable, Diversity, and Joining Genes and Characterization of Allelic and Copy-Number.
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Identification and characterization of a novel KRAS rearrangement in metastatic prostate cancer. Identification and characterization of a novel KRAS rearrangement.
Jennifer A. Lee, James R. Lupski  Neuron 
Hayun Lee, Yi Zhou, David W. Taylor, Dipali G. Sashital  Molecular Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Targeted Deletion of an Entire Chromosome Using CRISPR/Cas9
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick, Gang Bao  Molecular Therapy 
Julien Ablain, Ellen M. Durand, Song Yang, Yi Zhou, Leonard I. Zon 
Pervasive Targeting of Nascent Transcripts by Hfq
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Darryl Y. Nishimura, Ruth E. Swiderski, Charles C. Searby, Erik M
Next-Generation Sequencing of Duplication CNVs Reveals that Most Are Tandem and Some Create Fusion Genes at Breakpoints  Scott Newman, Karen E. Hermetz,
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2018)
Georgina Berrozpe, Gene O. Bryant, Katherine Warpinski, Mark Ptashne 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (October 2018)
Lack of Transcription Triggers H3K27me3 Accumulation in the Gene Body
Fig. 3 Genome editing of the MSTN gene.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 833-839 (February 2015) Deletions, Inversions, Duplications: Engineering of Structural Variants using CRISPR/Cas in Mice  Katerina Kraft, Sinje Geuer, Anja J. Will, Wing Lee Chan, Christina Paliou, Marina Borschiwer, Izabela Harabula, Lars Wittler, Martin Franke, Daniel M. Ibrahim, Bjørt K. Kragesteen, Malte Spielmann, Stefan Mundlos, Darío G. Lupiáñez, Guillaume Andrey  Cell Reports  Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 833-839 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.016 Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2015 10, 833-839DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Two sgRNAs Can Induce Structural Variants of the Intermediate Genomic Region (A) Overview and timing of CRISVar to obtain SVs in mouse. (B) A 232 kb region at the Pitx1 locus targeted for deletion, inversion, and duplication. Cas9 proteins and sgRNAs are depicted in yellow. (C) PCR amplifications of breakpoints from the different genetic configurations (DEL, deletion; DUP, duplication; INV A, inversion breakpoint A; INV B, inversion breakpoint B). BRP (breakpoints) A and B represent the WT product at the CRISPR target sites. (D) Genetic variability at the rearranged and WT breakpoints. SgRNAs are marked in green or red. Sequences of three clones are shown for each type of junction. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Cell Reports 2015 10, 833-839DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Rearrangements at Other Loci Summary of the other alleles in which SVs were induced. The alleles are ordered from the smallest generated SV (top: H2afy) to the largest (bottom: Epha4). Sizes of the rearranged regions are indicated next to the locus name. Cell Reports 2015 10, 833-839DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A 350 kb Deletion at the Laf4 Locus Recapitulates Nievergelt Syndrome (A) Schematic of the extended Laf4 genomic region. CRISPR/Cas binding sites are depicted in yellow. The induced deletion (350 kb) is shown below. (B) Radiograph of patient lower leg showing triangular tibia, missing fibula, and oligodactyly. (C) Skeletal preparations of WT and mutant embryos at E16.5. Cartilage is shown in blue and bone in red. Note the short ulna and radius with small ossification centers in forelimb and triangular tibia (magnification shown on right) and severely hypoplastic fibula in hindlimb. See also Table S2. Cell Reports 2015 10, 833-839DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CRISPR/Cas-Induced 1.5 Mb Deletion at the Epha4 Locus (A) Schematic of the extended Epha4/Pax3 genomic region. CRISPR/Cas binding sites are depicted in yellow. The induced deletion (1.5 Mb) is shown below. (B) The deletion of a 1.5 Mb region containing the Epha4 gene and surrounding gene desert results in a phenocopy of Epha4 knockout mouse but no other abnormalities. Footprints of hindlimbs show hopping gait in deletion mutant. See also Movie S1. Cell Reports 2015 10, 833-839DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.016) Copyright © 2015 The Authors Terms and Conditions