SALVATION ARMY BUILDING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meeting the Secretarys Standards: NPS Guidance on Special Issues Gary Sachau, National Park Service Historic Tax Credit Developers Conference St. Pete.
Advertisements

Eligibility and Standards James Garrison Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer.
Landmarks Preservation Commission.
Modernizing Modernism: Challenges with Preserving Post-War Buildings National Historic Tax Credit Conference Chicago, Illinois September 25, 2008 The Inland.
Working With the NPS and the States IPED / Reznick Historic Tax Credit Conference Miami Beach, FL February 5, 2009.
Standards for Rehabilitation
West Street Historic District Commission Preserving the unique character of Reading West Street Historic District Commission An introduction.
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Conditional Use Permit #6084 Proposed Chick-Fil-A Restaurant 1700 East Colorado.
Bungalow Court Preservation Concerns City Council September 8, 2014.
Ohio Historic Preservation Office The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation November 9, 2012.
“TOD” Development Opportunity Case Studies for Reference & Historic Preservation Opportunities Moline, Illinois October 18, 2011.
INTERNATIONAL CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF MONUMENTS AND SITES THE VENICE CHARTER.
The Preservation Principles of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation Projects David W. Look, FAIA, FAPT National Park Service.
Historic Tax Credit Basics : BRAC National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
C I T Y O F S A L E M Neighborhood South Salem March 18, 2008 PRESERVATION DISTRICT STUDY.
Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits Federal Incentives for Preservation.
Presentation to the German Village Historic Preservation Committee August 22, 2013.
City Council 2642 Second Street Appeal of Landmarks Commission Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 07CA-009 February 12, 2008.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006 Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (06-004) for a porch addition at th Avenue NW.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation.
Planning Department 897 Summit Avenue Application for Designation as a Historic Landmark City Council October 15, 2012.
Historic Preservation in Washington, DC. Purposes of the D.C. Historic Preservation Law Protect, enhance and perpetuate the distinctive elements of the.
Saving Tybee Island's history and preserving its character.
Standard 9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that.
Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoNovember 20, 2008.
1 Presented to the Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations By the City of Fort Worth, Planning and Development Department August 24, 2009 CONSERVATION.
Restoration is defined as the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period.
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Minor Conditional Use Permit #6003 (1528 Whitefield Road) City Council Meeting.
Standard 6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive.
Planning Department 781 Prospect Boulevard Willis (William) Hindry House Application for Historic Monument Designation City Council October 15, 2012.
Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program Part 2: Filling out the paperwork.
Planning & Community Development Department 817 South Madison Avenue Application for Landmark Designation City Council Meeting January 12, 2015.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties Building 1051 (FAI-00456) Building 1555 (FAI-00467)
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
THE PORTLAND BUILDING Portland Historic Landmarks Commission Briefing #1 November 26, 2012.
Planning & Community Development Department 180 South Euclid Avenue Demolition of Existing Structure Consolidated Design Review (Appeal) City Council June.
The Alberta Context Larry Pearson, M.E.Des. (Arch) Director, Historic Places Stewardship Programs Alberta Culture and Tourism.
Venice Breeze Suites CDP Application No CCC Hearing November 4, 2015 Item W17a.
Historic Districts Chapter 8 ARCH A Historic District is: – A geographically definable area—urban or rural, large or small—possessing a significant.
ARCH 5325 Conservation Policies
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
PHOENIX HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE HERITAGE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING
State College Borough Historic and Architectural Review Board
Proposed Thorndike-Madrillo Landmark District Public Hearing
Proposed Rose Villa-Oakdale Landmark District Public Hearing
Determination of Eligibility 5/4/16
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
760 South Arroyo Boulevard Lansing Beach House
1211 Wellington Avenue Application for Landmark Designation
Proposed Magnolia Landmark District Public Hearing
Application for Designation as a Historic Landmark
Proposed South Grand-Covington Place Landmark District Public Hearing
Constructed c.1932 Designated as a Master Plan Historic Site in 1979 Significant for commercial and social history related to the Depression A unique.
1600 San Pasqual Street Application for Landmark Designation
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment & Future Consent Application
310 Linda Vista Avenue J.D. Gunder House
2480 Oswego Street Application for Landmark Designation
Application for Landmark Designation October 22, 2012
Determination of Eligibility 6/21/17
251 South Street Existing Town Hall
Determination of Eligibility 2/20/19
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Plan Commission Workshop #1
Determination of Eligibility 2/20/19
Historic Tax Credit Basics : BRAC
Cooper-Molera Preservation Principles:
Dare to C.A.R.E. Logo Guidelines JULY 2015
The Statement of Significance: Format and Content
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Overlay Zone Spokane Historic Landmarks Commission Final Public Hearing August 28, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

SALVATION ARMY BUILDING Retroactive Certificate of Appropriateness application Chicago dogs awning 245 W Main Avenue

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main April 23, 1922: 1939

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main 2019: Awning for Chicago Dog business was hung without a building permit so the SHLC was not afforded the ability for review of the proposed awning July 2019: business owners came in for permit which kicked in the Certificate of Appropriateness process The SHLC is reviewing a retroactive CoA application

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main Secretary of the Interior Standards: Standard #2: The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive materials or alteration of features, spaces and spatial relationships that characterize a property will be avoided. Standard #9: New additions, exterior alterations or related new construction will not destroy historic materials, features and spatial relationships that characterize the property. The new work will be differentiated from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.

Salvation Army Building – 245 W Main The Salvation Army building is a study in symmetry The awning detracts from the symmetry of the building The awning is incompatible with the building’s historic character – according to historic photos, the building never had awnings Not recommended: Using inappropriately scaled signs and logos or other types of signs that obscure, damage, or destroy remaining character-defining features of the historic building.

Staff Recommendation Because the awning was placed on the building without a building permit, staff recommends a denial of a Certificate of Appropriateness However, because the awning is ultimately removable without damaging historic features of the building, staff does not recommend forcing the business owners to remove the awning/sign Staff recommends placing a denial of CoA with the building permit so that it is on record that the SHLC did not approve the awning’s installation or design and this is not precedent setting