Classification systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Advertisements

Invertebrate Standards in Rivers Paul Logan. Existing CEN standards relating to the ecological assessment of freshwaters - TG1 - invertebrates Quality.
WSNTG Annual Conference September 2007 Water Services National Training Group 11 th Annual Conference 6 th September 2007.
South Eastern River Basin District - Environmental Quality Standard Development-
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
LVĢMA, 2006 LATVIJAS VIDES, ĢEOLOĢIJAS UN METEOROLOĢIJAS AĢENTŪRA Water data availability Normunds Kadiķis.
A Practical Approach: The General Physico-Chemical Quality Elements and the Classification of Ecological Status.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
Europe-wide monitoring obligations under the EU Water Framework Directive Jos G. Timmerman Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE CONVERSION OF RBPAPs INTO RBMPs MONITORING INCEPTION WORKSHOP ISTAMBUL February Alfredo CORROCHANO CODORNÍU Carmen.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
Polsko-Norweski Fundusz Badań Naukowych / Polish-Norwegian Research Fund Third phase of deWELopment project Scope of the work Warsaw, 1st Feb
National Sampling Programme Carol McCarthy, A/Senior Engineer LAWCO/ Kilkenny County Council Environmental Services Training Group Annual Conference 26.
Corina Carpentier AquaLife Workshop, Kiel, Germany 2nd June 2010
Agenda item 5: Discussion of next steps
Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment
REFCOND EU Water Framework Directive project funded by the European Commission DG Environment Included in the EU Water Directors “Common Strategy on.
EU Water Framework Directive
CIS - Project 2.4 Transitional and Coastal Waters
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
Dave Jowett, Chair UK Marine Task Team
The design of the monitoring network for lakes and rivers in Finland
One-out-all-out and other indicators
GEP vs. GES.
Experiences of designing WFD-monitoring networks in the Netherlands
EU Water Framework Directive
EEA - EMMA Workshop November 20-21, 2006 EEA, Copenhagen
Water Directors meeting - Dresden
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
One-out-all-out and other indicators
COAST Lisbon February Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
One-out-all-out and other indicators
Claire Vincent Environment and Heritage Service United Kingdom
The normal balance of ingredients
EU Water Framework Directive
REFCOND Workshop Uppsala, May 2001
Definition and Establishment of Reference Conditions
Group 2.
Nutrient Standards: Proposals for further work
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Meeting of Water Directors Future Work Programme of the CIS
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
CLASSIFICATION TOOLS FOR BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE FAUNA IN COASTAL WATERS
of the Work Programme 17. March 2003
Umweltbundesamt, Austria
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
confidence in classification
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Testing of GW-quality data from subsequent surveillance monitoring for a significant increase Proposal developed by Umweltbundesamt and quo data (subcontractor)
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
EU Water Framework Directive
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Assessing the environmental status in the Mediterranean Sea: a case-study in Saronikos Gulf to be extended to the regional sea Angel Borja (AZTI), Alexandra.
Statistical Methods for Assessing Compliance – case studies Task 3.1B
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
Working Group D Reporting, Brussels 31 March – 1 April 2008
Frequently asked questions Part II: Coordination of monitoring under WFD and BHD Workshop: Biodiversity and Water - Links between EU nature and water.
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Defining Reference Conditions Setting Class Boundaries
European waters - assessment of status and pressures 2018
Relationships for Broad & Intercalibration Types Geoff Phillips
Joint REFCOND and Intercalibration Meeting
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Classification systems kari.nygaard@niva.no Representing EEA in WG 2.4.

WFD - the normative classification can be summarized as: high ≈ no or only minor deviations; good ≈ low levels of disturbance, but deviate only slightly; moderate ≈ moderate deviations and significant effects; poor ≈ major biological alterations and substantial deviation; bad ≈ severe biological alterations and large deviation.

Two branches - Ecological status and Chemical status Ecological status - 5 classes (previous slide) including quality elements Phytoplankton Phytobenthos Zoobenthos + Fish fauna (transitional waters) Supporting Chemical and physical elements (including nutrients and oxygen) Chemical status - 2 classes: Good and Failing to Achieve Good status. Quality elements: HS according to list of priority substances

WFD - stipulates 3 types of monitoring Surveillance - status & long-term changes Operational - systems at risk & ameliorative effects Investigative - ascertain causes of systems failing to meet environmental objectives

Errors associated with classification - sample collection & processing sampling variability (e.g. natural spatial heterogeneity) sample processing (sort & identification) natural temporal variability asymmetrical pollution effects

Example of stressor - response relationship

Choice of upper anchor 95% CI may result in higher frequency of type 1 errors (false +) 10th percentile may result in higher frequency of type 2 errors (false -)

Choice of lower anchor zero value may result in higher frequency of type 2 errors minimum value may result in higher frequency of type 1 errors

Probability of misbanding (PM)† misclassification error increases markedly with band-width error! †Taken from Clarke 2000

Where do we start?

Extrapolating lab results to field relationships between test species and some stressors are known BUT... data not applicable to entire communities unsuitable for systems disturbed by other stressors

Do different approaches differ? What is the expected variability among methods commonly used to establish reference?

What is the reference value of element X? x+n x+1

Paleore Expert Regional Site-specific Monitoring construction opinion model a r c t i / l n e o h b m d s u Site-specific Monitoring model

The WFD is only the first footprint, we still need to find the path!

To find the path we need: Reference conditions to start Agree on the “equipment and tools” monitoring data expert knowledge - general and site spesific statistics what about introduced species? Can we “go shopping” in existing nationals systems? Intercalibration - to agree on the borders between good and moderate, good and Failing to Achieve Good status

When the classification system is in place, how do we use it? Phytoplankton: Good Zoobenthos: Good Nutrients: Good Oxygen: Good Chemical status: Failing to Achieve Good status => Ecological Status = Good => Chemical Status = Red light

When the classification system is in place, how do we use it? Phytoplankton: Good Zoobenthos: Moderate Nutrients: Good/Moderate Oxygen: Good/Moderate Chemical status: Good => Ecological Status = Moderate => Chemical Status = Good