Departmental Assurance Survey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MSc Dissertation Writing
Advertisements

Welcome to our World... Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi Fiscal Affairs.
Delivered By :In Partnership With : Presented By BG (NS) Winston Toh Senior Vice President / General Manager ST Electronics (e-Services) Pte Ltd.
Sarbanes-Oxley, Internal Control & Cash
Audit Findings on Kindergarten Inspections Internal Audit Section Finance Division November 2014.
Briefing on Subvention Inspection Subvention Finance Section Social Welfare Department Vivian Lai 4 July 2011.
7-1 The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (referred to simply as Sarbanes- Oxley) applies only to companies whose stock is traded on public exchanges. Its purpose.
FMSiS and benchmarking a seminar at the bursars conference 05 July 2010 Presented by Simon Maddocks Dave Phillips David Dilling.
Business Education Department - Standard Grade Administration.
Audit of Public Procurement
© 2008 California State University, Fullerton Account Management & Reporting Tools Financial Services Division of Administration & Finance.
The University of California UC Financial Management Jim Corkill Controller, Accounting Services & Controls University of California, Santa Barbara November,
Money Handling Procedures Updated by Roger Sparrow, Karen Ramage & David Herbst April 2014.
Finance Tasha Robinson Director of Finance (803)
Audit Advisory Committee Public health transition update 22 January 2013.
School Finances for Finance Subcommittees School Councils.
Interim Executive Director June  Financial Management Practices Audit Results Fiscal Year Audit Results Fiscal Year Internal.
CARA Select Committee on Security and Constitutional Development Criminal Assets Recovery Account 16 February 2011.
Audit Findings on Kindergarten Inspections Internal Audit Section Finance Division November 2013.
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON THE FORENSIC AUDIT THAT WAS CONDUCTED DURING May 2006.
Finance presentation to Blackpool Health Overview and Scrutiny Committee.
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Lina Williams Budget & Financial Analyst Tuesday, July 28 th 2015.
Prepared by: C. Douglas Cloud Professor Emeritus of Accounting Pepperdine University © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned,
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Finance update – Year end 15/16 Lorna Bocquet and Tanya Hitchen.
This document remains the intellectual property of Arrow Accounting and may not be copied, or used without their prior written approval Use of any material.
Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) Funding and Community Advisory Services.
Reflections on applying for TDAP and institutional designation Haymo Thiel Principal.
CONTINUOUS AFS REVIEW CONTRIBUTING TO SUSTAINABLE SERVICE DELIVERY Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions.
Durham County Non-Profit Funding Program Board of County Commissioners’ Worksession August 6, 2012.
Finance Update Year end 2016/17 Izzy Clayton and Tanya Hitchen.
ICAO TECHNICAL COOPERATION BUREAU
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
  EXPERIENCE OF SLOVENIAN AUDIT AUTHORITY WITH FRAUD SUSPICON CASES Nataša Prah Prague, 3. November 2016.
Capital Project / Infrastructure Renewal – Making the Business Case
PROGRESS REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT ACT
FY 2018 Hyperion Operating Budget Timeline
Budgeting and Financial Management for Human Services
President’s Administrative Innovation Fund: Connecting IT Subject Matter Expertise CIO Council Update
Finance Brief May 2016.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Things Financial + Oct 2015.
Sarbanes-Oxley, Internal Control, and Cash
STAFF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT IN-SERVICE
MARKETING, PURCHASING AND PRODUCTION (7 - 9%)
Balancing the Operating Budget Ward Forum Presentation
Sarbanes-Oxley, Internal Control, and Cash
WASHINGTON COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL BUDGET PRESENTATION
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Internal controls 01-Nov-2017.
Business Center Workshop I Introduction to Accounts & Reports
Customs Declaration Service
Economic Development Department Annual Financial Statements 2011/12
SHARE Special Project Cash Management Remediation
US Department of Treasury Minority CDE NMTC Program Training and Technical Assistance Introduction and Intake Form Overview October 17-18, 2016 W W.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
SHARE Special Project Cash Remediation Phase II Planning and Implementation Certification July 22, 2015 Requesting Agency: Ron Spilman State Controller.
Capital Improvement Plans
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Closing of Books Business Services May 8, 2019.
Washburn center for children
Business Services – All Campus May 22, 2019
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
FINANCIAL REPORTING CONSIDERATIONS & OTHER 6 NOVEMBER 2018
2015 January February March April May June July August September
YEAR 9 – GCSE Business HT 1 (3rd September – Friday 25th October, weeks) HT 2 Wk1 Wk2 Wk3 Wk4 Wk5 Wk6 Wk7 Wk8 HOLIDAY Wk9 HT 2 (4th.
Cash Handling Policies and Procedures
Presentation transcript:

Departmental Assurance Survey Financial User Group presentation 13th July 2018 #[TitlePage] © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.

Contents Introduction Summary Results 2017/18 Points for improvement Further Information Timeline of Survey Preparation and Analysis Feedback and Continuous Improvement © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.

A brief summary of the results and criteria used Summary Results 2017/18 A brief summary of the results and criteria used No ‘red’ topic areas 86 responses to the survey with 99% of surveys returned Same as 2016/17 14 ‘green’ topic areas compared with 17 in 2016/17 Three areas have moved from a green to an ‘amber’ topic area Nine ‘amber’ topic areas – an increase from three reported in 2016/17 © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.

University Level and UAS Results (weakest to strongest) The diagram below outlines the average score for each of the 23 topic areas of the 2017/18 survey. There are no areas with a weak control environment. For the following areas, the score both across UAS respondents as well as across the University was over 3.5, indicating a strong control environment: Trust Funds, Expenses and Advances, Budgetary Controls, Student Feedback, Health and Safety, University issued Credit Cards, Procurement and Purchasing, Cash Handling and Banking, Recruitment, Reward and Payroll, Research Grants and Contracts, and Fixed Assets. *For Donations, all UAS responded “Not Applicable” to all questions; as such, there is no UAS score for Donations Key: Weak Control Environment (x≤2.5) Satisfactory Control Environment (2.5 < x < 3.5) Strong Control Environment (x≥3.5) © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.

Financial areas – points of improvement Accounts Receivable - Deposits and prepayments and credit checks on customers General Ledger and Grant Journals - Secondary review of journal entries by an independent officer and journals providing a sufficient description. Reward and Payroll - Secondary review of payroll Procurement and Purchasing - POs authorised before order placed, authorisation to raise POs for all relevant staff (including academic) and supplier list on Marketplace University issued Credit Cards - Independent review of reconciliations and journal entries for expenditure Expenses and Advances - Regular cost monitoring Cash and cheque banking, and petty cash: One individual responsible for banking, which requires all Departments to travel to the Old Schools. © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.

Non-financial areas for improvement: Health and Safety - insufficient training for fire wardens and other areas pertaining to health and safety. Responsibilities for risk assessments and safety inspections not understood. Estate Management - lack of awareness of the University’s space utilisation guidelines. Informal and disparate systems for sharing space. IT Controls – Non completion of regular backups, testing of restoration processes. Lack of suitable firewalls in place and a lack of periodic reviews of system access. Risk Management – Local risk registers not subject to a review. © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.

Further information University of Cambridge – Department Assurance Survey 2017/18 © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and confidential.

Timeline of Survey Preparation and Analysis Timescales for delivery of the Departmental Assurance Survey and results In the below diagram, we have outlined the timetable for preparation, completion, and analysis of the Department Assurance survey. We have also included the final next steps for conclusion of our work. Following issuance of the 2017/18 report, we plan to further refine the survey based on feedback received. Following refinement, the 2018/19 survey will be distributed to all Departments in November 2018. Action October November December January February March April May June July September Survey refinement through consultation with management Survey distribution and collection of results Initial analysis of survey results Department visits Additional analysis of survey results and draft report Distribute survey results to Central Offices and Finance Division Presentation to Schools/Departments Draft suggested actions and obtain management responses Distribute final report to the Audit Committee Next Steps Engage with stakeholders to refine survey questions for 2018/19 Follow-up with management on suggested actions © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.

Continuous improvement Incorporating feedback to further enhance the survey The Departmental Assurance survey analysis and results continue to provide a valuable source of information to Internal Audit in understanding the overall control environment in place across the University. We continue to revise and update both the survey content and our overall approach in response to feedback received from throughout the University. As part of our continuous improvement of the survey, we would like to hear your feedback Could we delve deeper in to some topic areas? Were the questions clear? Any ideas for new topic areas? Could we present our results any better? © 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.

© 2018 Deloitte LLP. Private and Confidential.