Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Ligand-Specific Interactions Modulate Kinetic, Energetic, and Mechanical Properties of the Human β2 Adrenergic Receptor  Michael Zocher, Juan J. Fung,
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (September 2006)
The Signaling Pathway of Rhodopsin
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of a Novel Globular Domain in RBM10 Containing OCRE, the Octamer Repeat Sequence Motif  Bryan T. Martin, Pedro Serrano,
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Naomi Courtemanche, Doug Barrick  Structure 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Crystal Structures of Human GlyRα3 Bound to Ivermectin
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
NMR Polypeptide Backbone Conformation of the E
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Structural Basis for Ligand Binding to the Guanidine-I Riboswitch
Structural Basis for Ligand Recognition and Activation of RAGE
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

β2-Adrenergic Receptor Conformational Response to Fusion Protein in the Third Intracellular Loop  Matthew T. Eddy, Tatiana Didenko, Raymond C. Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich  Structure  Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 2190-2197 (December 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.09.015 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2016 24, 2190-2197DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.09.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Locations of the 19F-NMR Probes in β2AR-T4L Used in This Work and Ligand-Efficacy-Dependent Effects on Local Conformational Equilibria Observed at C265 (A) Locations of TET 19F-NMR labels in the crystal structure of β2AR-T4L in complex with carazolol (PDB: 2RH1) (Cherezov et al., 2007). β2AR and T4L are shown as gray ribbon and blue surface representations, respectively. TET-labeled cysteines at positions 265, 327, and 341 are indicated as yellow spheres. (B) 1D 19F-NMR spectra of β2AR-T4L(TETC265, C327S, C341A) and β2AR(TETC265, C327S, C341A) measured at 280 K for complexes with six different ligands and without addition of a ligand. The data for β2AR (TETC265, C327S, C341A) were taken from Liu et al. (2012a). Dashed vertical red and blue lines indicate the previously assigned chemical shifts (Liu et al., 2012a) of the active-like and inactive functional states for β2AR (TETC265, C327S, C341A), and NMR signals representing these states are shown in red (active-like) and blue (inactive). All experiments were measured at 280 K, and the following parameters were used to measure and process the spectra: data size 1,024 complex points, acquisition time 51 ms, 24,576 scans per experiment. Prior to Fourier transformation the data were multiplied with an exponential function with a line-broadening factor of 30 Hz and zero-filled to 2,048 points. Structure 2016 24, 2190-2197DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.09.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Helix VII Ligand-Efficacy-Related Conformational Equilibrium Is Preserved in β2AR-T4L Complexes Except for the Norepinephrine Complex 1D 19F-NMR spectra of β2AR-T4L(C265A, TETC327, C341A) and β2AR(C265A, TETC327, C341A) measured with six ligands and without addition of a ligand (“Apo”) are shown, as recorded at 280 K. The data for β2AR(C265A, TETC327, C341A) were taken from Liu et al. (2012a). Deconvolution with Lorentzian line shapes representing individual components are indicated in blue (inactive state) and red (active-like state). Dashed red and blue vertical lines correspond to the previously assigned chemical shifts for the active-like and inactive functional states for β2AR(C265A, TETC327, C341A) (Liu et al., 2012a). Thin black and thick gray lines indicate the experimental data and the fitting results, respectively. Chemical structures of the ligands used in the current work are displayed on the right, where the ethanolamine substituents are highlighted in yellow. Structure 2016 24, 2190-2197DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.09.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Visualizing the Effects of T4L on Local Conformational Equilibria Related to the G-Protein and Arrestin Signaling Pathways in β2AR-T4L (A) Schematic side-view representation of β2AR. The transmembrane helices I to V are shaded in gray. The helices VI and VII, which are in equilibrium between two conformational states manifested by different NMR chemical shifts of 19F probes attached to C265 and C327 (Liu et al., 2012a), are represented as dashed rectangles in blue and cyan, respectively. The signaling pathways to G protein (blue) and β-arrestin (cyan) are indicated, and the positions of the 19F-NMR labels are shown by yellow spheres, where the active-like state is identified by a black circle. The orthosteric ligand binding cavity is indicated by green shading. For all ligands listed in (B), the response of the local conformational equilibria at the intracellular tips of helices VI and VII in β2AR is related with the efficacy of the ligand bound, i.e., the population of the active-like state is higher for ligands with higher efficacy (Liu et al., 2012a; see Figures 1 and 2). (B) Schematic side views of β2AR-T4L. Same presentation as in (A), except that helix VI is represented by solid blue lines, the T4L fusion protein is depicted as a red oval, and its impact on local conformational equilibria is indicated by red arrows and the intensity of red shading. (C) View from the extracellular surface of the β2AR-T4L complexes shown in (B). Circles indicate the helices I to VII. Ligands are represented in green, with black rectangles indicating hydrogen bonds between the ligand, N113 in helix III, and N312 in helix VII. In the upper panel, red arrows indicate that long-range effects from T4L cause a contraction of the ligand binding pocket (see text). Overall, (B) and (C) illustrate that the T4L fusion has a strong effect on the adjacent helix VI, and that a long-range effect via the orthosteric ligand binding cavity on the 19F-NMR probe at the tip of helix VII is suppressed in the presence of ligands with hydrophobic substituents at the ethanolamine end (Figure 2) (see text). Structure 2016 24, 2190-2197DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.09.015) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions