Excited-state quantum phase transitions, in the Extended Dicke Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statistical mechanics
Advertisements

Hamiltonian Chaos and the standard map Poincare section and twist maps. Area preserving mappings. Standard map as time sections of kicked oscillator (link.
Generalized pairing models, Saclay, June 2005 Generalized models of pairing in non-degenerate orbits J. Dukelsky, IEM, Madrid, Spain D.D. Warner, Daresbury,
Quantum Critical Behavior of Disordered Itinerant Ferromagnets D. Belitz – University of Oregon, USA T.R. Kirkpatrick – University of Maryland, USA M.T.
Non-equilibrium dynamics in the Dicke model Izabella Lovas Supervisor: Balázs Dóra Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Breakdown of the adiabatic approximation in low-dimensional gapless systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University Vladimir Gritsev Harvard University.
Localized Perturbations of Integrable Billiards Saar Rahav Technion, Haifa, May 2004.
Superfluid insulator transition in a moving condensate Anatoli Polkovnikov Harvard University Ehud Altman, Eugene Demler, Bertrand Halperin, Misha Lukin.
Mechanics.
Quantum fermions from classical statistics. quantum mechanics can be described by classical statistics !
Universality in ultra-cold fermionic atom gases. with S. Diehl, H.Gies, J.Pawlowski S. Diehl, H.Gies, J.Pawlowski.
Nuclear Low-lying Spectrum and Quantum Phase Transition Zhipan Li School of Physical Science and Technology Southwest University 17th Nuclear Physics Workshop,
EURISOL User Group, Florence, Jan Spin-Dependent Pre-Equilibrium Exciton Model Calculations for Heavy Ions E. Běták Institute of Physics SAS,
Quantum Mechanics from Classical Statistics. what is an atom ? quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum mechanics : isolated object quantum field theory.
Slow dynamics in gapless low-dimensional systems Anatoli Polkovnikov, Boston University AFOSR Vladimir Gritsev – Harvard Ehud Altman -Weizmann Eugene Demler.
Geometric characterization of nodal domains Y. Elon, C. Joas, S. Gnutzman and U. Smilansky Non-regular surfaces and random wave ensembles General scope.
Topological Insulators and Beyond
Bose-Einstein Condensate Fundaments, Excitation and Turbulence Vanderlei Salvador Bagnato Instituto de Física de São Carlos – Universidade de São Paulo.
Vibrational Spectroscopy
MSEG 803 Equilibria in Material Systems 6: Phase space and microstates Prof. Juejun (JJ) Hu
Reversing chaos Boris Fine Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology University of Heidelberg.
Michiel Snoek September 21, 2011 FINESS 2011 Heidelberg Rigorous mean-field dynamics of lattice bosons: Quenches from the Mott insulator Quenches from.
Semi-classics for non- integrable systems Lecture 8 of “Introduction to Quantum Chaos”
PHY206: Atomic Spectra  Lecturer: Dr Stathes Paganis  Office: D29, Hicks Building  Phone: 
1 CE 530 Molecular Simulation Lecture 6 David A. Kofke Department of Chemical Engineering SUNY Buffalo
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
E XCITED-STATE QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS IN SYSTEMS WITH FEW DEGREES OF FREEDOM Pavel Stránský Seminar at the Mathematical Modelling Lab, Northumbria University,
6.852: Distributed Algorithms Spring, 2008 April 1, 2008 Class 14 – Part 2 Applications of Distributed Algorithms to Diverse Fields.
Monodromy & Excited-State Quantum Phase Transitions in Integrable Systems Collective Vibrations of Nuclei Pavel Cejnar Institute of Particle & Nuclear.
The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.
Quantization via Fractional Revivals Quantum Optics II Cozumel, December, 2004 Carlos Stroud, University of Rochester Collaborators:
Interference in BEC Interference of 2 BEC’s - experiments Do Bose-Einstein condensates have a macroscopic phase? How can it be measured? Castin & Dalibard.
Pavel Stránský Complexity and multidiscipline: new approaches to health 18 April 2012 I NTERPLAY BETWEEN REGULARITY AND CHAOS IN SIMPLE PHYSICAL SYSTEMS.
Lecture 2. Why BEC is linked with single particle quantum behaviour over macroscopic length scales Interference between separately prepared condensates.
Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.
MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 6.The theory of molecular orbitals for the description of nanosystems (part II) The density matrix.
C LASSIFICATION OF ESQPT S AND FINITE-SIZE EFFECTS Pavel Stránský ESQPT, Trento 22 September 2015 Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University.
1 / 674 CHAOTIC DYNAMICS AND QUANTUM STATE PATTERNS IN COLLECTIVE MODELS OF NUCLEI Pavel Stránský Collaborators: Michal Macek, Pavel Cejnar Institute of.
Quantum Phase Transitions (QPT) in Finite Nuclei R. F. Casten June 21, 2010, CERN/ISOLDE.
Pavel Stránský 1,2 3 rd Chaotic Modeling and Simulation International Conference, Chania, Greece, rd January Institute of Particle and Nuclear.
Classical Chaos in Geometric Collective Model Pavel Stránský, Pavel Cejnar, Matúš Kurian Institute of Particle and Nuclear Phycics Faculty of Mathematics.
Q UANTUM CHAOS IN THE COLLECTIVE DYNAMICS OF NUCLEI Pavel Cejnar, Pavel Stránský, Michal Macek DPG Frühjahrstagung, Bochum 2009, Germany Institute.
Anisotropic exactly solvable models in the cold atomic systems Jiang, Guan, Wang & Lin Junpeng Cao.
Monatomic Crystals.
Interacting boson model s-bosons (l=0) d-bosons (l=2) Interpretation: “nucleon pairs with l = 0, 2” “quanta of collective excitations” Dynamical algebra:
Non classical correlations of two interacting qubits coupled to independent reservoirs R. Migliore CNR-INFM, Research Unit CNISM of Palermo Dipartimento.
Quantum Phase Transitions in Nuclei
Q UANTUM CHAOS AND P ERES LATTICES FOR 0+ STATES IN THE G EOMETRIC COLLECTIVE MODEL Pavel Stránský, Pavel Cejnar, Michal Macek 5th Workshop on Shape-Phase.
Statistical Mechanics and Multi-Scale Simulation Methods ChBE
Quantum Phase Transition from Spherical to γ-unstable for Bose-Fermi System Mahmut Böyükata Kırıkkale University Turkey collabration with Padova–Sevilla.
Chapter 3 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics. Questions QM answers 1) How is the state of a system described mathematically? (In CM – via generalized coordinates.
STATISTICAL MECHANICS PD Dr. Christian Holm PART 5-6 Some special topics, Thermal Radiation, and Plank distribution.
QUANTUM TRANSITIONS WITHIN THE FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION REAL FUNCTIONAL
Time Dependent Perturbation Theory
The units of g(): (energy)-1
A rotating hairy BH in AdS_3
Coarsening dynamics Harry Cheung 2 Nov 2017.
Quantum mechanics from classical statistics
Spin and Magnetic Moments
The Harmonic Oscillator
Classical Mechanics PHYS 2006 Tim Freegarde.
Quantum One.
Quantum Two.
Novel quantum states in spin-orbit coupled quantum gases
Ehud Altman Anatoli Polkovnikov Bertrand Halperin Mikhail Lukin
Quantum Two.
Quantum Two Body Problem, Hydrogen Atom
周黎红 中国科学院物理研究所 凝聚态理论与材料计算实验室 指导老师: 崔晓玲 arXiv:1507,01341(2015)
Nuclear shapes for the critical point
FOR RANDOMLY PERTURBED Martin Dvořák, Pavel Cejnar
Presentation transcript:

Excited-state quantum phase transitions, in the Extended Dicke Model monodromy, and non-equilibrium dynamics in the Extended Dicke Model Pavel Stránský www.pavelstransky.cz Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics Charles University in Prague Czech Republic In collaboration with: Pavel Cejnar, Michal Kloc, Michal Macek IPNP, Charles Univeristy in Prague, Czech Republic Seminario del departamento de Estructura de la Materia, ICN UNAM 6 December 2017

Outline ESQPT: Definition, evidence in the literature ESQPT: Theory (level density, flow rate) ESQPT in the Dicke model ESQPT: Monodromy ESQPT: Quantum quenches (ESQPT: Thermodynamical consequences) Summary

Quantum phase transition (QPT) A nonanalytic change (in the infinite-size limit) of ground-state properties of a system by varying an external control parameter l at absolute zero temperature (only quantum fluctuations present) potential-wells evolutions in a quantum CUSP model (details later) l E first-order continuous(nth order) l Examples: ferromagnet-paramegnet transitions insulator-superfluid transitions superradiant phase transitions ... S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (2011) L.D. Carr, Understanding Quantum Phase Transitions (2011)

Excited-state quantum phase transition Generalization of the QPTs for the excited spectra (ESQPT) a) discontinuity in the smooth level density r critical borderlines E b) discontinuity in the average level flow rate f a) b) l ESQPT’s effect is best visible in averaged quantities characterizing bundles of energy levels in individual level themselves M.A. Caprio, P. Cejnar, F. Iachello, Ann. Phys. 323, 1106 (2008) P. Cejnar, P. Stránský, Phys. Rev. E 78, 031130 (2008)

Evidence of ESQPTs in the literature P. Cejnar, M. Macek, S. Heinze, J. Jolie, J. Dobeš, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, L515 (2006) O(6)-U(5) transition in the Interacting Boson Model s-boson condensate s+d-bosons condensate P. Pérez-Fernández, P. Cejnar, J.M. Arias, J. Dukelsky, J.E. García-Ramos, A. Relaño, Phys. Rev. A 83, 033802 (2009) M.A. Caprio, P. Cejnar, F. Iachello, Annals of Physics 323, 1106 (2008) 2-level fermionic pairing model M.A. Caprio, J.H. Skrabacz, F. Iachello, J. Phys. A 44, 075303 (2011) 2-level pairing models P. Cejnar, P. Stránský, Phys. Rev. E 78, 031130 (2008) Geometric collective model of atomic nuclei Graphene (ESQPT experimentally observed) B. Dietz, F. Iachello, M. Miski-Oglu, N. Pietralla, A. Richter, L. von Smekal, and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. B 88, 104101 (2013) Lipkin model P. Pérez-Fernández, A. Relaño, J.M. Arias, J. Dukelsky, J.E. García-Ramos, Phys. Rev. A 80, 032111 (2009)

ESQPT Theory

Manifestations of ESQPTs Hamiltonian analytic function on the phase space 𝒙= 𝒑,𝒒 f degrees of freedom energy surfaces E x E l l Interesting behaviour expected at energies of the Hamiltonian stationary points Critical borderlines correspond with the positions of local extremes in the constant-energy surfaces

a) Level density oscillatory component smooth component (Weyl formula) (semiclassically given by the Gutzwiller trace formula; not relevant here in the infinite-size limit) smooth component (Weyl formula) volume function of the classical phase space Numerical approximation I. Hoveijn, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 348, 530 (2008) M. Kastner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 167 (2008)

Level density: Nondegenerate stationary point w Morse lemma Approximation of the Hamiltonian with a quadratic function in the vicinity of w index r of the stationary point energy surface E x2 x1 e y1 y2 w local volume integral local coordinates r = 0 r > 0 P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, Phys. Lett. A380, 2637 (2016)

Nondegenerate stationary point: singularities f integer f half-integer (relevant for lattices and time-dependent Hamiltonian systems) r even r odd r even r odd [f-1]-th derivative E Ew logarithmic divergence E Ew jump E Ew inverse sqrt Each singularity of the level density at a nondegenerate stationary point is uniquely classified by the two numbers (f,r) P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, Phys. Lett. A380, 2637 (2016)

Level density: Degenerate stationary point Special class of separable Hamiltonians (flat minimum): (analytic only for mk even integer) - discontinuity in the 𝝈−𝟏 -th derivative Example: We require discontinuity of the t-th derivative - satisfied when even in the thermodynamic limit the level density can be discontinuous Higher flatness of the stationary point enhances its signatures in the spectrum (it shifts the singularity towards lower derivatives).

Level density: Degenerate stationary point Special class of separable Hamiltonians (flat minimum): (analytic only for mk even integer) Structural stability - an arbitrarily small perturbation converts any function into a Morse function: quadratic minimum M. Kastner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 167 (2008) - discontinuity of the -th derivative Example 1: We require discontinuity of the t-th derivative - satisfied when flat minimum even in the thermodynamic limit the level density can be discontinuous Higher flatness of the stationary point enhances its signatures in the spectrum (it shifts the singularity towards lower derivatives).

b) Level flow rate E l (≡ time) Continuity equation derivatives (≡ position) trajectories of individual levels – flow lines Continuity equation derivatives l (≡ time) Using Hellmann-Feynman formula, the flow rate can be expressed as We expect the same nonanalyticity in the flow rate as in the level density - weighted average of the quantum expectation value of 𝐻 𝐼 (𝒙) in the eigenstates around energy 𝐸 - experimentally more important than the level density itself P. Stránský, M. Macek, P. Cejnar, Ann. Phys. 345, 73 (2014) P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, Phys. Lett. A380, 2637 (2016)

in the Extended Dicke Model ESQPTs in the Extended Dicke Model

Dicke model of superradiance interaction of a single-mode bosonic field with a chain of two-level atoms R.H, Dicke, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954) K. Hepp, E. Lieb, Ann. Phys. 76, 360 (1973) 𝑓=2 degrees of freedom SU 2 ×HW(1) algebra 𝐉 = 𝑖=1 𝑁 𝝈 𝑖 2 Semiclassical Hamiltonian M.A. Bastarrachea-Magnani et al., Phys. Rev. A 89, 032101 (2014)

another integral of motion M = b + b + J 𝑧 +𝑗 𝛿=0 integrable regime another integral of motion M = b + b + J 𝑧 +𝑗 For fixed 𝑀 effectively 1 degree of freedom ESQPT appears in the critical irrep 𝑀=𝑁= 𝑗 2 𝐻 𝑇𝐶 𝜆 𝑝 ′ , 𝑥 ′ ;𝑀 = 𝜔− 𝜔 0 𝑝 ′ 2 + 𝑥 ′ 2 2 + 𝜔 0 𝑀+𝜆 𝑥 ′ 𝑗 1− 1 𝑗 2 𝑀− 𝑝 ′ 2 + 𝑥 ′ 2 2 2 level density (semiclassical calculation) flow rate ESQPT 𝝎> 𝝎 𝟎 detuned M. Kloc, P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, Ann. Phys. 382, 85 (2017)

𝛿≠0 nonintegrable regime 𝑓=2 degrees of freedom nonanalyticities appear in the first derivative of r 𝜹=𝟎.𝟑 ESQPTs level density flow rate (2,1) (2,2) QPT 2nd order M. Kloc, P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, Ann. Phys. 382, 85 (2017)

Flow rate from quantum spectrum ESQPTs flow rate (2,1) (2,2) QPT 2nd order Superradiant Normal TavisCummings Hellmann-Feynman formula: 𝑑 𝐸 𝑖 𝑑𝜆 = 𝑑𝐻 𝑑𝜆 𝑖 = 𝑉 𝑖 𝑁 Dicke M. Kloc, P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, Ann. Phys. 382, 85 (2017)

Chaos in the Dicke model Nonintegrability – allows one to study connection between the ESQPTs and chaos 𝜆 𝑐 = 𝜔 𝜔 0 1+𝛿 𝜆 0 = 𝜔 𝜔 0 1−𝛿 M. Kloc, P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, Ann. Phys. 382, 85 (2017)

ESQPT and Monodromy

Monodromy existence of singular tori splitting the phase space into two parts with analytically non-connectable types of motion induced by unstable equilibrium points of integrable Hamiltonian Example: spherical pendulum 𝑓=2 p x Phase portrait for a trajectory with angular momentum 𝑀=0 pinched torus - prevents introducing global action-angle variables in the whole phase space

Monodromy in the Dicke model 𝐻 𝑇𝐶 𝜆 𝑝 ′ , 𝑥 ′ ;𝑀 = 𝜔− 𝜔 0 𝑝 ′ 2 + 𝑥 ′ 2 2 + 𝜔 0 𝑀+𝜆 𝑥 ′ 𝑗 1− 1 𝑗 2 𝑀− 𝑝 ′ 2 + 𝑥 ′ 2 2 2 𝜹=𝟎 energy surfaces critical trajectory on the pinched torus 𝑀=𝑁 fully excited atomic ensemble 𝑀=0.9𝑁 𝑀=𝑁 𝑀=1.1𝑁 𝝎= 𝝎 𝟎 tuned 𝝎> 𝝎 𝟎 detuned O. Babelon, L. Cantini, B. Doucot, J. Stat. Mech. 2009, P07011 (2009) M. Kloc, P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 315205 (2017)

Decay of monodromy 𝝎= 𝝎 𝟎 tuned Poincaré sections of a perturbed system at the energy of the monodromy point Each color marks a passage of a trajectory through plane 𝜙′=0 Each trajectory has different value of 𝑀 𝑀 =𝑁 orbit plotted in black. This orbit is destroyed first. M. Kloc, P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 315205 (2017)

Quantum monodromy 𝑴′ 𝒌′ = 1 1 0 1 𝑴 𝒌 𝝎= 𝝎 𝟎 tuned defect in a lattice (energy x momentum) of eigenvalues at the point of classical pinched torus encircling this point Elementary cell given by basis vectors 𝑴= 1, 𝐸 𝑘 𝑀+1 − 𝐸 𝑘 𝑀 𝒌= 0, 𝐸 𝑘+1 𝑀 − 𝐸 𝑘 𝑀 transforms as 𝑴′ 𝒌′ = 1 1 0 1 𝑴 𝒌 monodromy matrix Experimentally identified in excited spectra of some molecules, eg. H2O, CO2.

Quantum monodromy 𝝎= 𝝎 𝟎 tuned defect in a lattice (energy x momentum) of eigenvalues at the point of classical pinched torus The defect appears also in lattices for expectation values of arbitrary operators – indicator of monodromy if the second integral of motion is not known M. Kloc, P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 315205 (2017)

Decay of quantum monodromy The lattice defect is destroyed already with the weakest perturbation (due to the high energy level density near the monodromy point) M. Kloc, P. Stránský, P. Cejnar, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 315205 (2017)

ESQPT and quantum quenches (work in progress)

Quantum quench Survival amplitude Survival probability Abrupt diabatic change 𝜆 𝑖 → 𝜆 𝑓 of the control parameter in a system 𝐻 𝜆 = 𝐻 0 +𝜆𝑉 followed by unitary quantum evolution at 𝜆 𝑓 Evolution depends on the fragmentation of the initial state | 𝜓 𝑖 in the eigenstates | 𝜙 𝑛 𝑓 of the final state Due to singularities in the energy level density, a response of a quench onto a ESQPT or across a critical borderline should differ from the quench ending on the same side Survival amplitude (Loschmidt amplitude, fidelity) 𝑎 𝑡 ≡ 𝜓 𝑖 𝑒 − 𝑖 ℏ 𝐻 𝑓 𝑡 𝜓 𝑖 = 𝑛 𝜓 𝑖 𝜙 𝑛 𝑓 2 𝑒 − 𝑖 ℏ 𝐸 𝑛 𝑓 𝑡 = 𝑛 𝑐 𝑛 2 𝑒 − 𝑖 ℏ 𝐸 𝑛 𝑓 𝑡 Survival probability (Loschmidt echo) 𝑝 𝑡 ≡ 𝑎 𝑡 2 = 𝑛 𝑐 𝑛 4 +2 𝑛<𝑚 𝑐 𝑛 2 𝑐 𝑚 2 cos 𝐸 𝑚 𝑓 − 𝐸 𝑛 𝑓 ℏ 𝑡 P. Pérez-Fernández et al., Phys. Rev. A 83, 033802 (2011)

- given by the dispersion of the initial state Quantum quench in the 𝛿=0 Dicke model critical irrep Center of the energy distribution after quench: 𝐻 𝑓 𝑖 = 𝐸 𝑖 +Δ𝜆 𝑉 𝑖 = 𝐸 𝑖 +Δ𝜆 𝑑 𝐸 𝑖 𝑑𝜆 Dispersion after quench: Δ 𝑖 𝑂 2 = 𝑂 2 𝑖 − 𝑂 𝑖 2 Δ 𝑖 𝐻 𝑓 =Δ𝜆 Δ 𝑖 𝑉 𝑂 𝑖 ≡ 𝜓 𝑖 𝑂 𝜓 𝑖 Forward quench: Short time decay - from the theory of the Loschmidt echo 𝑝 𝑡 ≈1− 𝑡 𝜏 2 𝜏= 1 Δ 𝑖 𝐻 𝑓 - given by the dispersion of the initial state For the ground-state Δ 0 𝑉 =𝛿.

Quantum quench in the 𝛿=0 Dicke model critical irrep Center of the energy distribution after quench: 𝐻 𝑓 𝑖 = 𝐸 𝑖 +Δ𝜆 𝑉 𝑖 = 𝐸 𝑖 +Δ𝜆 𝑑 𝐸 𝑖 𝑑𝜆 Dispersion after quench: Δ 𝑖 𝑂 2 = 𝑂 2 𝑖 − 𝑂 𝑖 2 Δ 𝑖 𝐻 𝑓 =Δ𝜆 Δ 𝑖 𝑉 𝑂 𝑖 ≡ 𝜓 𝑖 𝑂 𝜓 𝑖 Forward quench: Long time behavior recurences 1/t power law

Quantum quench in the 𝛿=0 Dicke model critical irrep Center of the energy distribution after quench: 𝐻 𝑓 𝑖 = 𝐸 𝑖 +Δ𝜆 𝑉 𝑖 = 𝐸 𝑖 +Δ𝜆 𝑑 𝐸 𝑖 𝑑𝜆 Dispersion after quench: Δ 𝑖 𝑂 2 = 𝑂 2 𝑖 − 𝑂 𝑖 2 Δ 𝑖 𝐻 𝑓 =Δ𝜆 Δ 𝑖 𝑉 𝑂 𝑖 ≡ 𝜓 𝑖 𝑂 𝜓 𝑖 Backward quench 𝜆 𝑓 =0.3 𝝀 𝒇 =𝟎.𝟕𝟕 ESQPT 𝜆 𝑓 =1

Quantum quench in the 𝛿≠0 Dicke model 𝜹=𝟎.𝟑 Forward quench Short-time behavior for the ground-state: 𝑝 𝑡 =1−Δ 𝜆 2 𝛿 2 𝑡 2 (ground state)

Quantum quench in the 𝛿≠0 Dicke model 𝜹=𝟎.𝟑 Sem zadejte rovnici. survival of eigenstates 𝑁=12 Quantum quench in the 𝛿≠0 Dicke model Forward quench Short-time behavior for the ground-state: 𝑝 𝑡 =1−Δ 𝜆 2 𝛿 2 𝑡 2 (ground state)

Quantum quench in the 𝛿≠0 Dicke model Backward quenchs 𝜹=𝟎.𝟑 𝜆 𝑓 =0.8 𝜆 𝑓 =1.1 In this full 𝑓=2 system the ESQPT-related phenomena are expected to be smoother than in the restricted integrable system Chaoticity can obscure the analysis 𝝀 𝒇 =𝟏.𝟒𝟕𝟓 ESQPT 𝜆 𝑓 =1.5

Thank you for attention Summary ESQPTs originate in stationary points of the Hamiltonian and manifest themselves as singularities in the smooth level density and in the average flow rate. Nondegenerate stationary points Singularities classified uniquely and completely by two numbers (𝒇,𝒓) Singularities occur in the 𝑓−1 -th derivative of the smooth level density or flow rate and are always of a jump / logarithmic divergence type Degenerate stationary points Higher flatness of the stationary point shifts the discontinuity towards lower derivatives Phenomena connected with the existence ESQPTs Monodromy, changes in the nonequilibrium dynamics Thank you for attention