Osmo-Regulation of Bacterial Transcription via Poised RNA Polymerase

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Advertisements

THZ1 Reveals Roles for Cdk7 in Co-transcriptional Capping and Pausing
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Grounded: Transcriptional Pausing in Naive mESCs
Cotranscriptionally Formed DNA:RNA Hybrids Mediate Transcription Elongation Impairment and Transcription-Associated Recombination  Pablo Huertas, Andrés.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Iman M Shammat, Sharona E Gordon  Neuron 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
A Specialized Nucleosome Modulates Transcription Factor Access to a C
Genomic Run-On Evaluates Transcription Rates for All Yeast Genes and Identifies Gene Regulatory Mechanisms  José Garcı́a-Martı́nez, Agustı́n Aranda, José.
John F Ross, Xuan Liu, Brian David Dynlacht  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of the Pap Epigenetic Switch by CpxAR
Tae Kook Kim, Tom Maniatis  Molecular Cell 
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2001)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
RNA Polymerase Pausing Regulates Translation Initiation by Providing Additional Time for TRAP-RNA Interaction  Alexander V. Yakhnin, Helen Yakhnin, Paul.
Hideaki Saeki, Jesper Q. Svejstrup  Molecular Cell 
Maria M. Konarska, Josep Vilardell, Charles C. Query  Molecular Cell 
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
DNA Topoisomerase I and PC4 Can Interact with Human TFIIIC to Promote Both Accurate Termination and Transcription Reinitiation by RNA Polymerase III 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
LexA Cleavage Is Required for CTX Prophage Induction
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (March 2018)
Nuclear Retention Prevents Premature Cytoplasmic Appearance of mRNA
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Teuta Pilizota, Joshua W. Shaevitz  Biophysical Journal 
Mode of Regulation and the Insulation of Bacterial Gene Expression
Helena Celesnik, Atilio Deana, Joel G. Belasco  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
RNA Helicase A Mediates Association of CBP with RNA Polymerase II
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Paul B. Mason, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell 
Uncoupling Promoter Opening from Start-Site Scanning
Poised RNA Polymerase II Gives Pause for Thought
The Effect of Distance on Long-Range Chromatin Interactions
Michael J Dye, Nick J Proudfoot  Molecular Cell 
Importance of a Single Base Pair for Discrimination between Intron-Containing and Intronless Alleles by Endonuclease I-BmoI  David R. Edgell, Matthew.
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Polycomb Silencing Blocks Transcription Initiation
RNA Polymerase II Collision Interrupts Convergent Transcription
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Three period Homologs in Mammals: Differential Light Responses in the Suprachiasmatic Circadian Clock and Oscillating Transcripts Outside of Brain  Mark.
VP16 and Ubiquitin Current Biology
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Michael T Marr, Jeffrey W Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Rodney A King, Sarbani Banik-Maiti, Ding Jun Jin, Robert A Weisberg 
Haisun Zhu, Carla B. Green  Current Biology 
The Escherichia coli RNA polymerase α subunit linker: length requirements for transcription activation at CRP‐dependent promoters Comparison of the effect.
Structural Organization of the RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex
A SWI/SNF–Related Chromatin Remodeling Complex, E-RC1, Is Required for Tissue- Specific Transcriptional Regulation by EKLF In Vitro  Jennifer A Armstrong,
Presentation transcript:

Osmo-Regulation of Bacterial Transcription via Poised RNA Polymerase Shun Jin Lee, Jay D Gralla  Molecular Cell  Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 153-162 (April 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00202-3

Figure 1 Single-Round In Vitro Transcription Experiments Measuring the Effect of Increasing Ionic Solute Concentrations (A) Potassium glutamate titration. osmY and fic-con promoters were transcribed by σ38 and the lacUV5 promoter by σ70 in a heparin-challenge protocol. Potassium glutamate concentrations were 100 mM (lanes 1, 5, and 9), 200 mM (lanes 2, 6, and 10), 300 mM (lanes 3, 7, and 11), and 400 mM (lanes 4, 8, and 12), and transcription was for 5 min. Percent transcription was calculated by standardizing to the highest signal for each set of experiments. White bars represent 100 mM, light gray 200 mM, gray 300 mM, and black 400 mM potassium glutamate. (B) Percent transcription versus time at 100 mM and 400 mM potassium glutamate at the osmY promoter. (C) Potassium chloride titration. Potassium chloride concentrations were 100, 200, 300, and 400 mM from left to right for each experiment. Molecular Cell 2004 14, 153-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00202-3)

Figure 2 Footprinting of σ38 RNA Polymerase on Supercoiled Plasmid DNA (A) KMnO4 footprinting at the osmY promoter. (B) DNase I footprinting of osmY and fic-con. Gray brackets on the left indicate the region of hypersensitive sites detected at osmY. Black brackets indicate the protected region for both osmY and fic-con. Molecular Cell 2004 14, 153-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00202-3)

Figure 3 Multiple-Round Transcription of the osmY Promoter Left panel, 100 mM potassium glutamate. Right panel, 400 mM potassium glutamate. The time points were 2.5 min (lanes 1 and 5), 5 min (lanes 2 and 6), 10 min (lanes 3 and 7), and 15 min (lanes 4 and 8). The time to complete a single round of transcription was determined by single-round time course experiments and was ∼3 min for 100 mM potassium glutamate and ∼5 min for 400 mM potassium glutamate. Relative transcription versus time is plotted. Relative transcription is the amount of transcription normalized to single-round transcription levels at 100 mM potassium glutamate (e.g., relative transcription of 6 indicates that six times as much transcript is produced as compared to the amount produced during a single round of transcription at 100 mM potassium glutamate). Molecular Cell 2004 14, 153-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00202-3)

Figure 4 Single-Round Transcription Experiment of Various osmY G-Element Mutants at Increasing Potassium Glutamate Concentrations Potassium glutamate concentrations were 100 mM (lanes 1, 5, and 9), 200 mM (lanes 2, 6, and 10), 300 mM (lanes 3, 7, and 11), and 400 mM (lanes 4, 8, and 12). Percent transcription was calculated by standardizing the signal to osmY transcription levels at 300 mM potassium glutamate. White bars represent 100 mM, light gray 200 mM, gray 300 mM and black 400 mM potassium glutamate. Molecular Cell 2004 14, 153-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00202-3)

Figure 5 Single-Round Transcription Experiments Measuring the Effect of Various Electro-Neutral Osmolytes on σ38- and σ70-Dependent Transcription osmY and fic-con promoters were transcribed by σ38 and the lacUV5 promoter by σ70. The levels of trehalose used (top panels) were, from left to right, no trehalose, 100 mM, 200 mM, 300 mM, and 400 mM. The levels of L-proline (middle panels) were, from left to right, no L-proline, 100 mM, 200 mM, 300 mM, and 400 mM. The levels of glycine betaine (bottom panels) were no glycine betaine, 100 mM, 200 mM, 300 mM, 400 mM, 500 mM, and 700 mM. Molecular Cell 2004 14, 153-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00202-3)

Figure 6 Model for How Escherichia coli Changes Its Transcription in Response to an Osmotic Shock Molecular Cell 2004 14, 153-162DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00202-3)