FQPA: “It’s a Good Thing” (for Kids)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 By: Jimmy Abele.
Advertisements

Perspectives from EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program
Session III: Assessing Cumulative Effects of Endocrine Active Substances 9:15 - 9:30 Introduction” Rick Becker (Session Chair and Panel Moderator) 9:30.
1 Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division Sheryl K. Reilly, Ph.D. Chief, Biochemical Pesticides Branch
 Enacted August 3, 1996  No amendments since  United States Federal Law  Amended:  Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)  Federal.
Priority-setting for the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Pesticide Active Ingredients Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp Office of Pesticide Programs U.S.
Controlling Toxic Chemicals: Production, Use, and Disposal Chapter 19 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Pesticides and Pest Control By Brian Kaestner with thanks to Miller and Clements.
1 Pesticides Sherry L. Glick Office of Pesticide Programs U.S. EPA
Controlling Pesticides and Toxic Chemicals Chapter 20 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternThomas and Callan, Environmental Economics.
Briefing for Acting EPA Administrator (Your Name Here) Background on the Alar Situation January 2003 Richard Wilson based upon an analysis by John Graham.
BY ANDREA BUTLER PERIOD 6 5/4/10 Food Quality Protection Act 1996.
Pest Management for NRCS Conservation Planning Barbara Stewart, State Agronomist, NRCS.
Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD readings Human Exposure Assessment II (8th of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology)
Cumulative Risk Assessment for Pesticide Regulation: A Risk Characterization Challenge Mary A. Fox, PhD, MPH Linda C. Abbott, PhD USDA Office of Risk Assessment.
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
June 16-19, USEPA Cancer Guidelines: Mode of Carcinogenic Action 1 ICABR – Impacts of the Bioeconomy on Agricultural Sustainability, the Environment.
 Draft Year: 1996  Amendment Years: Not amended  The FQPA is a National act By: Shelby Weaver per:4.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATION FOR PESTICIDES Jim Hester Agency Environmental Coordinator.
1 Environmental Issues in Food Science. 2 Environmental Regulation  Silent Spring (Rachel Carson)  Early regulation  NEPA Clean Water  Clean Air 
1 10. Food Safety & Agricultural Chemicals as an Ethical Issue Larry D. Sanders AGEC 4990: Spring 2002 Dept. of Ag Economics Oklahoma State University.
The Role of Research in the Business of the Environmental Protection Agency Steven Bradbury, Director Environmental Fate & Effects Division Office of Pesticide.
Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Status of the U.S. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) September
Pesticides and Pest Control G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 13 th Edition Chapter 20 G. Tyler Miller’s Living in the Environment 13 th Edition.
Pesticide Regulatory Process
Quill Law Group LLC1 EDSP Compliance Timing, Procedural and Legal Issues Terry F. Quill Quill Law Group LLC 1667 K St, NW Washington, DC
Chapter 15 & 16 Lecture Risks and Pests. Hazard vs. Risk Hazard Anything that causes: 1.Injury, disease, or death to humans 2.Damage to property 3.Destruction.
Slide 1 of 24 EPA’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) Use of Exposure Data in Priority Setting Bill Wooge Office of Science Coordination and.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
Reregistration of Consumer Pesticides: US Environmental Protection Agency December 13, 2005 US Environmental Protection Agency December 13, 2005 Mosquito.
9/19/11ESPP /19/11ESPP-78 2 Presence of matter (gas, liquid, solid) or energy (heat, noise, radiation) whose nature, location, or quantity directly.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 by: Bjorn Bookser period 2.
Regulatory Processes for Pesticides Mark Hartman Antimicrobials Division (AD) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances United States Environmental.
International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 2009 Endocrine Workshop The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: What Can Screening Results.
Environmental Legislation & Regulations Ecology and the Environment Mr. Corsini - NWHS.
Using Pesticide Use Data to Evaluate IPM Programs Larry Wilhoit Department of Pesticide Regulation.
Pesticide Regulation Susan King Extension Specialist University of Delaware.
Briefing for Acting EPA Administrator (Your Name Here) Background on the Alar Situation January 2010 Richard Wilson.
Pesticide Evaluation Report Laws of the United States Government for use of Pesticides on Projects in other Countries 12 Parts.
Food Quality Protection Act (1996)
Overview of Risk Assessment and Risk Management of PIPs in the U.S.
FIFRA 101 Karl Arne May 17, 2010 Karl Arne May 17, 2010.
Session VII WEIGHING IN ON MICROBIOLOGICAL ADI: EXPERIENCES AND PERSPECTIVES Introduction October 26, 2012.
EDSP Implementation: Concerns for the Pesticide Industry ISRTP 2009 Endocrine Workshop: The Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: What Can Screening Results.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) Rochelle Weerackoon.
Virginia Cooperative Extension Virginia Tech Pesticide Programs Department of Entomology Blacksburg, Virginia Nov
Risk Assessment Dec 4 -6, 2006.
Chapter 15 & 16 Lecture Risks and Pests
Decision Contexts in a Changing Toxicology Paradigm
Pest Control.
CAN IT BE DONE? IPM re-evaluation possible new products/ use of old
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
FOOD QUALITY PROTECTION ACT
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 By: Taylor Hunner Pd. #2
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA)
From Lab to Label: Innovations That Feed The World
APES Legislation Project
Food Quality protection Act of 1996
Some Quiz Questions Unit: Risk Assessment.
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
Apes Ch 11 Risk, Toxicology, and Human Healthy
Herbicide Registration & Environmental Impact
Pesticides & Children: Ten Years After FQPA
Elaine M. Faustman Institute for Risk Analysis and Risk Communication
Presentation transcript:

FQPA: “It’s a Good Thing” (for Kids) Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp, PhD, DABT (USEPA, retired) Presented at the 2007 Society of Toxicology Regulatory and Safety Evaluation Specialty Section Charlotte, NC March 26, 2007

Why? Implementation of the FQPA directives is leading to a reduction in exposure to pesticides possessing a greater degree of hazard concern

Reminder FQPA = FIFRA + FFDCA

FFDCA When setting or (re)assessing tolerances, EPA is to: Apply an extra 10X safety factor to assure the protection of infants and children; Assess total pesticide exposure from all non-occupational sources: diet, drinking water, residential and other non-occupational sources Assess effects of exposure to multiple pesticides with a common mechanism of toxicity

Impact of “Kids” Safety Factor 1X 3X 10X Size of Safety Factor * Population Adjusted Dose

Impact of Aggregate Assessment The “Risk Cup” = the PAD R R F DW DW R F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F R F F F F F F Food residues (F) alone (pre-FQPA) Food Residues (F) + Drinking Water Residues (DW) Food residues (F) + Drinking Water Residues (DW) + Residential Residues (R)

Impact of Cumulative Assessment R R R F R R R R R R R DW R F DW F F R R R R F F F F F F DW T F F F F F F R F F F F R F F R F

Cumulative Risk Assessment Decisions Chlorinated triazines (3) and Chloroacetanilides (2) meet safety standard Organophosphates From > 40 in 1996 to 32 today Cancelled/phased out substantial number of residential uses Cancelled/phased out > 50 uses on kids’ foods

FIFRA Tolerance Reassessment Reregistration Expedited Review for Reduced Risk Pesticides Registration Renewal

FIFRA-Tolerance Reassessment All existing tolerances to be reassessed by August 3, 2006 Accomplishments as of August 2006: Focused on the “Worst First:” OPs, Carbamates, Group B, Cq carcinogens, RfD exceeders, high hazard inerts Completed assessment of 9637 of 9721 tolerances for ~470 food use pesticides and high hazard inerts Recommended revocation of 3200 tolerances Recommended modification of 1200 tolerances Confirmed safety of 5237 tolerances

FIFRA-Reregistration FQPA mandated completion of reregistration (for the fourth time) Accomplishments as of August 3, 2006: Completed 559 of 566 reregistration eligibility decisions for food-use pesticides Remaining 54 non-food use cases to be completed by October, 2008. ~4400 of ~17,600 individual pesticide end-use product registrations cancelled

FIFRA-Reduced Risk Pesticides FQPA formalized 1992/3 guidance for expedited registration review of reduced risk (RR) conventional pesticides Areas of criteria supporting definition of RR Human Health Non-target organisms (birds and fish) Potential for groundwater contamination Lower use rates, less frequent application Low pest resistance potential Compatibility with IPM Efficacy

RR Human Health Effects Factors Very low mammalian toxicity Toxicity generally lower than alternative (10-100x) Displaces chemicals that pose high concern (e.g., the OPs, Probable carcinogens) Reduces exposure in occupational settings

RR Pesticide Actions:1994-2006 Number of active ingredients reviewed: 70 Number of new actives: 47 Number of OP alternatives*: 28 Number of new uses granted: 668 Number of new uses granted for OP alternatives: 260 * 1999- first year of expedited review of OP Alternatives

FIFRA-Registration Renewal FQPA mandates periodic review of pesticide registration 15-year review cycle Procedural regulations in place (August, 2006) Schedule for FY07-FY10 issued (October, 2006) Covers conventional, antimicrobial, biochemical, microbial pesticides

I’m Maggie. I’m 2 weeks old I’m Drew. I’m 11 years old Our Grandma says that FQPA is a good thing for infants and kids like us.