Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages (November 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
Advertisements

UV as an Amplifier Rather Than Inducer of NF-κB Activity
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Shitao Li, Lingyan Wang, Michael A. Berman, Ye Zhang, Martin E. Dorf 
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Yu-Hsin Chiu, Jennifer Y. Lee, Lewis C. Cantley  Molecular Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Donghang Cheng, Jocelyn Côté, Salam Shaaban, Mark T. Bedford 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (December 2011)
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
B Cell Receptor Activation and Chemical Induction Trigger Caspase-Mediated Cleavage of PIAS1 to Facilitate Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation  Kun Zhang,
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Tomohisa Kato, Mireille Delhase, Alexander Hoffmann, Michael Karin 
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages (March 2012)
Lysine 63 Polyubiquitination of the Nerve Growth Factor Receptor TrkA Directs Internalization and Signaling  Thangiah Geetha, Jianxiong Jiang, Marie W.
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
TRADD–TRAF2 and TRADD–FADD Interactions Define Two Distinct TNF Receptor 1 Signal Transduction Pathways  Hailing Hsu, Hong-Bing Shu, Ming-Gui Pan, David.
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
SOCS1 Links Cytokine Signaling to p53 and Senescence
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
Thiocolchicoside inhibits TNF-dependent IκBα phosphorylation, IκBα degradation, p65 phosphorylation, and p65 nuclear translocation. Thiocolchicoside inhibits.
NF-κB Is Required for UV-Induced JNK Activation via Induction of PKCδ
Dong Zhang, Kathrin Zaugg, Tak W. Mak, Stephen J. Elledge  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 16, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
SIRT1 Regulates the Function of the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Protein
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Active Repression of Antiapoptotic Gene Expression by RelA(p65) NF-κB
Phosphorylation of CBP by IKKα Promotes Cell Growth by Switching the Binding Preference of CBP from p53 to NF-κB  Wei-Chien Huang, Tsai-Kai Ju, Mien-Chie.
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
c-IAP1 Cooperates with Myc by Acting as a Ubiquitin Ligase for Mad1
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
The interaction between PARsylated BRCA1 and RAP80 is required for maintaining BRCA1–RAP80–PARP1 complex integrity after DNA damage and normal HRR regulation.
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 365-378 (November 2009) A Nuclear Poly(ADP-Ribose)-Dependent Signalosome Confers DNA Damage-Induced IκB Kinase Activation  Michael Stilmann, Michael Hinz, Seda Çöl Arslan, Anja Zimmer, Valérie Schreiber, Claus Scheidereit  Molecular Cell  Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 365-378 (November 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.032 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 PARP-1 Is Required for DNA Damage-Induced NF-κB Activation (A) Recombinant, C-terminally Strep-tagged IKKγ was used to pull down interaction partners from HeLa cell extracts (duplicate experiment). Interaction with PARP-1 was detected by western blotting. (B) Wild-type (WT) and Parp-1−/− MEF were irradiated and cellular fractions were prepared at indicated time points. Cytoplasmic (CE) or nuclear extracts (NE) were immunoblotted with p65, IκBα, phospho-IκBα, or PARP-1 antibodies. (C) Wild-type and Parp-1−/− MEF were irradiated (IR) and lysates analyzed with an in vitro kinase assay (KA). Precipitated IKKγ was controlled by western blotting (WB). (D) Parp-1−/− MEF were transfected with empty vector (control) or PARP-1 expression constructs. Mutant and wild-type cells were irradiated and assayed for NF-κB activation by EMSA. PARP-1 protein levels were evaluated by western blotting. (E) Macrophages (top panel) and small intestinal epithelial cells (bottom panel) from wild-type and Parp-1−/− mice were exposed to IR (10 Gy) and further incubated, as indicated. Extracts were assayed for NF-κB activity by EMSA. An EMSA with an Oct probe served as a loading control. Free probes are not shown. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 365-378DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.032) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 IKKγ Interacts with Automodified PARP-1 and PIASy (A) Wild-type MEF were γ-irradiated and protein extracts prepared at the indicated time points were subjected to IP with an IKKγ antibody. Samples were immunoblotted with antibodies against PAR, PARP-1, or IKKγ (left panel). Wild-type (untreated or preincubated with 3-AB) and Parp-1−/− MEF were analyzed as above. Specificity of the IP was confirmed with a control antibody (right panel). (Bottom panels) Protein expression in the lysates. (B) Wild-type MEF were γ-irradiated and cytoplasmic (CE) and nuclear extracts (NE) were prepared at indicated time points and analyzed by western blotting. (C) Wild-type, Parp-1−/−, and Piasy−/− MEF were assayed by EMSA for NF-κB activation following IR (2 hr) or etoposide (E; 100 μM; 2 hr) treatment. The genotype of Parp-1−/− and Piasy−/− MEF was confirmed by western blotting. An asterisk denotes the PIASy signal. (D) Ikkγ−/− MEF were transfected with empty vector or vectors encoding Flag-tagged IKKγ wild-type or deletion mutants, respectively. Extracts were prepared 10 min after IR, Flag-tagged proteins immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag antibody and samples were analyzed by western blotting with PARP-1 or Flag antibodies (top panels). Alternatively, protein extracts were subjected to PIASy IP followed by immunoblotting for Flag-tagged IKKγ constructs or PIASy, respectively (bottom panels). (Top panel) Scheme of IKKγ with kinase binding domain (KBD), leucine zipper (LZ), and zinc finger (ZF). Asterisks indicate precipitated IKKγ proteins. (E) Wild-type and Piasy−/− MEF were γ-irradiated. At indicated times, extracts were prepared and subjected to IP with an IKKγ antibody. Samples were immunoblotted with PARP-1, IKKγ, or PIASy antibodies. Bottom panels show protein expression in the lysates. Asterisks denote IKKγ and PIASy signals. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 365-378DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.032) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated PARP-1 Promotes Complex Formation of IKKγ with PIASy (A) Wild-type MEF were γ-irradiated, and extracts were prepared at indicated time points and subjected to IP with PIASy antibody. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by western blotting with PAR, PARP-1, IKKγ, or PIASy antibodies. Bottom panels show PAR, PARP-1, and IKKγ expression in cell lysates. (B) Wild-type (untreated or preincubated with 3-AB) and Parp-1−/− MEF were processed as in (A) and analyzed with PARP-1, IKKγ, or PIASy antibodies. (C) Wild-type and Ikkγ−/− MEF were analyzed as in (A). Note that additional, weak bands close to 55 kDa in (B) and (C) are caused by the IgG heavy chain. Asterisks in (A), (B), and (C) denote the specific PIASy signal. (D) Combinations of recombinant proteins, as indicated, were incubated and subjected to IP with PIASy antibody. IP samples and input were analyzed by western blotting, as indicated. (E) Recombinant proteins were analyzed as in (D), except that IP was performed with PARP-1 antibody. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 365-378DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.032) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PIASy Contains PAR Binding Motifs (A) PAR binding by purified recombinant IKK subunits and PIASy was determined using a slot-blot assay. Histone H2A and BSA were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Protein loading was determined by Ponceau S staining. (B) Schematic presentation of PIASy. SAP (SAF-A/B, Acinus, and PIAS) motif, RING-like domain (RLD), and PAR binding sites are indicated. (C) Alignment of PAR binding sequences. The sequences of other PAR binding motifs were taken from Pleschke et al. (2000) and Haince et al. (2007). Amino acids mutated to Ala in ATM-1, PIASy-1, and PIASy-2 are indicated by circles. (D) PAR binding of ATM and PIASy peptides (wild-type or mutants, as indicated in C) determined by slot-blot assay. Peptide loading was controlled by Sypro Ruby staining. (E) Piasy−/− MEF were transfected with empty vector or vectors encoding murine HA-tagged PIASy wild-type or point mutant M2 (as indicated in C), respectively. Extracts were prepared from untreated cells or 10 min after IR, as indicated. IP was carried out with anti-HA affinity matrix. Precipitates were analyzed by western blotting with PARP-1, IKKγ, or HA antibodies. The unspecific signal in the IKKγ western blot is caused by IgG. Bottom panels show protein expression in cell lysates. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 365-378DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.032) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PARP-1 Signalosome Requirement for IKKγ SUMOylation and IKK Activation (A) Lysates prepared from γ-irradiated wild-type, Parp-1−/−, and Piasy−/− MEF at the time points indicated were subjected to IP with an IKKγ antibody. Samples were analyzed by western blotting with SUMO-1 or IKKγ (sc-8330) antibodies. (B) Wild-type MEF were pretreated with DMSO or EB47 for 90 min and processed as in (A). (C) Piasy−/− MEF were transfected with empty vector or vectors encoding HA-tagged PIASy-wild-type or PIASy-M2. Extracts were prepared 60 min after IR and processed as in (A). In (B) and (C), lysates were prepared with modified RIPA buffer. SUMOylated species are indicated by an asterisk. (D) Piasy−/− MEF were transfected as in (C). Whole cell extracts were prepared 90 min after IR and assayed for NF-κB activation by EMSA. PIASy expression and IκBα phosphorylation were detected by western blotting. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 365-378DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.032) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ATM Is Part of the PARP-1 Signalosome (A) Wild-type MEF were exposed to IR. Lysates were prepared at indicated time points and used for IP with PIASy or IKKγ antibodies or as input control. Precipitates were analyzed for ATM, RIP1, PARP-1, IKKγ, and PIASy by western blotting. (Asterisk) Note that PIASy is poorly recovered in IKKγ IP, perhaps due to epitope shielding. (B) Wild-type and Parp-1−/− MEF were irradiated. Lysates were prepared and used for IP with IKKγ antibody. IKKγ, coprecipitated ATM, and phospho-ATM (pS1981) were analyzed by western blotting of IP samples and input lysates. (C) Piasy−/− MEF were transfected with empty vector or vectors encoding HA-tagged PIASy-wild-type or PIASy-M2. Extracts were prepared from untreated or irradiated cells, as indicated. IP was carried out with anti-HA affinity matrix. Precipitates were analyzed by western blotting with antibodies against ATM, phospho-ATM (pS1981), or HA. Bottom panels show protein expression in input lysates. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 365-378DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.032) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Equivalent Loss of Survival Signaling by Impairment of Single PARP-1 Signalosome Components (A) Wild-type, Parp-1−/−, Piasy−/−, and Ikkγ−/− MEF were γ-irradiated. Twenty-four hours later, induction of apoptosis was examined with annexin-V staining and flow cytometry. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of triplicates. Statistical significance was determined with the Student's t test. (B) Wild-type and Parp-1−/− MEF were γ-irradiated and total RNA was extracted at indicated time points. mRNA profiles of bcl-XL and β-actin were analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR (top panel). Signal intensities were quantified (bottom panel). (C) Wild-type and Parp-1−/− MEF were treated with etoposide (100 μM). Total RNA was extracted at indicated time points and analyzed as in (B). (D) Wild-type, Piasy−/−, and Ikkγ−/− MEF were preincubated with 3-AB (10 mM) for 90 min and irradiated, as indicated, and analyzed as in (A). (E) Schematic summary. DNA damage-induced IKK and NF-κB activation is triggered by PARP-1-mediated PAR formation. PARP-1 is recruited to DNA strand breaks and undergoes PAR automodification. Upon dissociation into the nucleoplasm, PARP-1 rapidly recruits PIASy, IKKγ, and ATM. The signalosome is stabilized by a network of direct protein-protein interactions as well as by PAR binding of PIASy and ATM through PAR binding motifs. PAR degradation by PARG causes subsequent destabilization of the signalosome, resulting in IKKγ SUMOylation, and NF-κB activation. Molecular Cell 2009 36, 365-378DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.032) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions