draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm-03

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Advertisements

1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-00 Author list: Tarek Saad
1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-03 Author list: Tarek Saad
Extensions to OSPF-TE for Inter-AS TE draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-01.txt Mach Renhai
BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-03 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
Draft-chen-rtgwg-resource-management-yang-00IETF 94 RTGWG1 PCE-initiated IP Tunnel draft-chen-pce-pce-initiated-ip-tunnel-00 Xia Chen, Zhenbin Li(Huawei)
Draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospf-extension-03 draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-00 IETF 88, November 3-8, 2013 P. Psenak, S.Previdi,
1 MPLS Source Label Mach Chen Xiaohu Xu Zhenbin Li Luyuan Fang IETF87 MPLS Aug Berlin draft-chen-mpls-source-label-00.
Konstantin agouros Omkar deshpande
draft-patel-raszuk-bgp-vector-routing-01
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
Zhenbin Li, Li Zhang(Huawei Technologies)
IETF 67, MPLS WG, San Diego 11/08/2006
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-06 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-05 Tarek Saad and Rakesh Gandhi.
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-04
LDP and RSVP Extension for MPLS Muti-Topology Support
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-06 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-05 Tarek Saad and Rakesh Gandhi.
Signaling RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs in an Inter-domain Environment draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-01.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
Signaled PID When Multiplexing Multiple Payloads over RSVP-TE LSPs draft-ali-mpls-sig-pid-multiplexing-case-00.txt Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems.
Authors Mach Chen Andrew G. Malis
N. Kumar, C. Pignataro, F. Iqbal, Z. Ali (Presenter) - Cisco Systems
Zhenbin Li, Shunwan Zhuang Huawei Technologies
A Unified Approach to IP Segment Routing
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
Xiaohu Xu & Stewart Bryant (Huawei) Hamid Assarpour (Broadcom)
DetNet Configuration YANG Model
draft-ali-spring-bfd-sr-policy-00
OSPF WG Status IETF 97, Seoul
Authors : Francois Clad, Cisco (presenter) Xiaoahu Xu, Alibaba
Separating Routing Planes using Segment Routing draft-gulkohegde-spring-separating-routing-planes-using-sr-00 IETF 98 – Chicago, USA Shraddha Hegde
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-00
IETF South Korea PCEP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing draft-li-pce-pcep-ls-sr-extension-01 Zhenbin Li (Huawei) Xia Chen (Huawei) Nan.
OSPF WG Status IETF 98, Chicago
BFD Directed Return Path draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
Ryan Zheng Lizhong Jin Thomas Nadeau George Swallow
draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-00
draft-gandhi-pce-pm-07
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
SRv6 BGP based overlay services draft-dawra-bess-srv6-services-00
IETF 103 Bangkok, Thailand - November 2018
Synonymous Flow Labels
draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-00
FlexE Design Team Presenter: Mach
IETF BIER, November 2017, Singapore
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-02.txt SRv6 OAM
IETF 103 – Bangkok November 2018
Extended BFD draft-mirmin-bfd-extended
OAM for Deterministic Networks with IP Data Plane draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam Greg Mirsky Mach Chen IETF-105 July 2019, Montreal.
Clarence Filsfils Pablo Camarillo John Leddy Daniel Voyer
PW Control Word Stitching
Quan Xiong(ZTE) Gregory Mirsky(ZTE) Chang Liu(China Unicom)
OAM for Deterministic Networks draft-mirsky-detnet-oam
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-03
draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-04
Scope and Approach of ONF OIMT Internet Protocol Work Items
BGP VPN service for SRv6 Plus IETF 105, Montreal
Parag Jain, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi (Cisco),
Royi Zigler(Broadcom)
Supporting Flexible Algorithm Prefix SIDs in LSP Ping/Traceroute
Unified Source Routing Instructions using MPLS Label Stack draft-xu-mpls-unified-source-routing-instruction-04 Xiaohu Xu (Huawei) Ahmed Bashandy (Cisco)
draft-ali-spring-srv6-oam-01.txt SRv6 OAM
Inter-AS OAM for SR Networks IETF 105, Montreal
draft-filsfils-spring-segment-routing-policy-05
Presentation transcript:

draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm-03 Performance Measurement in Segment Routing Networks with MPLS Data Plane draft-gandhi-spring-sr-mpls-pm-03 Rakesh Gandhi - Cisco Systems (rgandhi@cisco.com) - Presenter Clarence Filsfils - Cisco Systems (cfilsfil@cisco.com) Daniel Voyer - Bell Canada (daniel.voyer@bell.ca) Stefano Salsano - Universita di Roma "Tor Vergata" (stefano.salsano@uniroma2.it) Pier Luigi Ventre - CNIT (pierluigi.ventre@cnit.it) Mach Chen - Huawei (mach.chen@huawei.com) Sagar Soni - Cisco Systems (sagsoni@cisco.com) Patrick Khordoc - Cisco Systems (pkhordoc@cisco.com) Zafar Ali - Cisco Systems (zali@cisco.com) Daniel Bernier - Bell Canada (daniel.bernier@bell.ca) 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

Agenda Requirements and Scope In-band Probes for SR Links and P2P and P2MP SR Policies DM and LM Packets for SR Links and SR Policies Probe Responses SR Link Extended TE Metrics Advertisements Next Steps 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

Requirements and Scope Delay and Loss Performance Measurement (PM) for SR links and end-to-end P2P and P2MP SR Policies Delay and Loss extended TE link metrics advertisement in the network Scope: Segment Routing (SR) with MPLS data plane In-band PM probe messages Use RFC 6374 (defined for MPLS-TP) based mechanisms Use RFC 7876 (UDP return path) for probe response messages Informational 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

PM Probes for SR Links For SR links, the PM probe query messages for link delay and packet loss measurements are sent in-band using MPLS GAL/GAch header as defined in [RFC6374]. 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

PM Probes for P2P and P2MP SR Policies For end-to-end measurement of P2P and P2MP SR Policies, the PM probe query messages for delay and loss measurements are sent in-band using MPLS GAL/GAch header as defined in [RFC6374] and SR-MPLS label stack. 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

DM Probes for SR Links and SR Policies DM probes use the message format defined in [RFC6374] as payload. GAL : 13 GAch : 0x000C 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

LM Probes for SR Links and SR Policies LM probes use the message format defined in [RFC6374] as payload. GAL : 13 GAch : 0x000A (Direct mode) 0x000B (Inferred mode) 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

Probe Responses One-way Measurement Response (out-of-band) Sent to the querier node using the information from the UDP Return Object (URO) TLV [RFC7876]. URO TLV is sent by the querier node in the probe query messages and contains the UDP destination port and IP address. Two-way Measurement Response (in-band) Sent to the querier node using a message similar to the in-band probe query message as SR-MPLS packet. 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

Path Segment ID Path Segment ID [draft-cheng-spring-mpls-path-segment] can be used for Performance Measurement: Loss Measurement 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

SR Link Extended TE Metrics Advertisement PM procedure is used to measure delay and loss performance of SR Links. Compute SR Link Delay metrics (minimum-delay, maximum-delay, average-delay, delay-variance) and SR Link Packet Loss metric. SR link extended TE metrics advertised in the network using the TLVs defined in the following RFCs/Drafts: OSPF [RFC7471] ISIS [RFC7810] [draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis] BGP-LS [draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp] 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

Next Steps Welcome your comments and suggestions Multiple implementations for RFC 6374 already exist Request for WG adoption 103rd IETF @ Bangkok

Thank you. 103rd IETF @ Bangkok