Leverage effect of PAFs : experience from CAP integration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
Advertisements

Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, November 2005 Rural Development.
The LIFE Integrated Projects
Preparation for the next programming period DG AGRI, November 2005 EU rural development policy.
Integrated Projects Spetember 2013 Maja Mikosinska DG Environment European Commission.
EMFF Operational Programme EMFF programme: 6 main elements 1. Ex-ante conditionalities 2. Ex-ante evaluation 3. SWOT analysis & needs analysis.
Managing the Natura 2000 network: state of play, challenges and opportunities.
"Financing Natura 2000 & Biodiversity" Status and Perspective (in context of next EU multiannual financial framework) Micheal O'Briain, DG ENV European.
Regional Policy Common Strategic Framework The Commission's revised proposal for the CPR - COM (2012) 496 of 11 Sept.
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
Agriculture and Rural Development SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management Petr Lapka DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit "Consistency.
Commission Guidance on inland waterway development in the context of the EU Birds and Habitats Directives Kerstin Sundseth, Ecosystems LTD.
Commission proposal for a new LIFE Regulation ( ) Presentation to Directors Meeting DK 22 May 2012.
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 François Kremer DG ENV.B.3 Expert Group Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 23 November 2011
Introduction to Result- Based Agrienvironment schemes Jérémie Crespin Unit-B1 DG Environment.
An Action Plan for nature, people and the economy COM(2017) 198 final Nicola Notaro Head of Unit Unit D.3 "Nature Protection" DG Environment Tallinn.
Leader as a part of the new CAP
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
The LIFE program 13th Meeting of the Marine Strategy Coordination Group (MSCG), Brussels, 13/05/2014 Dørte PARDO LÓPEZ DG Environment, Unit E.3 European.
Directore General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
Guidance on Natura 2000 and Forests – Scoping Document
EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring
WORKSHOP 17th Sept 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Bruxelles, 3rd October 2012 LIFE11 NAT/IT/00044 GESTIRE
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
GUIDANCE DOCUMENT - SCOPING 1st meeting of the Sub-Group
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
The FACE Biodiversity Manifesto
Sergiu Didicescu, Unit H1 DG Agriculture and Rural Development
Financing Natura 2000 in the next MFF
New PAF format for Presentation & next steps
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
MedWetRivers LIFE+ Naturaleza 2011
1.- THE PROJECT. NATURA 2000 NETWORK IN SPAIN
Strategic Steering Group WFD and CAP, 19/03/2009
The environmental dimension of the EMFF
Green Infrastructure and Natura 2000
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
Prioritised Action Frameworks for Natura 2000 EU co-financing of conservation measures LIFE+ PAF Workshop Brussels, 3 October 2012.
CAP post-2020 state of play Caroline Pottier
When and how to best consider the provision of the Habitats directive
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Some thoughts on the PAF in an Irish context
Opportunities for financing Natura 2000 in the next MFF
Rural development support for implementing the Water Framework Directive Expert Group on WFD and Agriculture Seville, 6-7 April 2010.
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
PAF and EU-money for Natura 2000: the German experience
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000
Management of farmland in Natura 2000 Ideas for a first outline
ESTABLISHING CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR NATURA 2000 SITES
PROVISIONS UNDER THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE RELEVANT TO NEEI
The – new – LIFE program (Integrated Projects)
Natura 2000 management group Brussels, 19 May 2011
ESTABLISHING CONSERVATION MEASURES FOR NATURA 2000 SITES
Exchange of best practices for cost-effective marine measures including guidance for financing opportunities under the EMFF Exchange of views.
Green infrastructure developments at EEA 2018
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
What does it mean to have a forest in a Natura 2000 area?
WFD and agriculture Putting policy linkages into practice
Towards a prioritised action framework for financing Natura 2000
Methodology for assessment of Natura 2000 costs
Forestry Statistics Working Group February 2015, Luxembourg "Current and future requirements for forestry data– DG AGRI" Tamas Szedlak AGRI H4 DG.
Water related measures in Rural Development Programmes : assessment
AAdopted Rural Development Programmes – implications for second RBMPs
CGBN Co-ordination Group for Biodiversity and Nature
Presentation transcript:

Leverage effect of PAFs : experience from CAP integration NADEG, 04/12/2017

Key steps in CAP 14-20 adoption -Nov 2010 : CAP Communication (public goods, greening, top up natura) 1 year of AGRI-ENV dicussion on legal proposals -Nov 2011 : CAP Legal Proposals (30% greening) 2 years of codecision (decrease of env ambition of greening, ESPG replaces GAEC on wetland peatland, min 30 % for RD -Dec 2013 : CAP adoption. In paralle, negotiations on partnership agreements took place in 2012-2013. First RDP drafted, often before PAF existence

Visibility of PAFs/N2K in RD regulation: BASIC ACT 1305/2013 -Art 5 : Priority 4 ' focus area 4A : restoring, preserving and enhancing biodiversity, including in Natura 2000 areas, (…); -Art 8 strategy :each RDP shall include (…) an appropriate approach towards the environment, including the specific needs of Natura 2000 areas -Art 17 d (investments) : non -productive investments linked to (…) biodiversity conservation status of species and habitat as well as enhancing the public amenity value of a Natura 2000 area -Article 20 (basic services) : support shall cover (…) the drawing up and updating of protection and management plans relating to Natura 2000 sites -Article 30 (Natura 2000 payment) IMPLEMENTING ACT 808/2014 -Annex I : SWOT include specific needs of Natura 2000 according to the PAFs -Annex IV : indicators C34 (Natura 2000 areas), C36 (Conservation Status of Agricultural habitats)

Linking RDPs sections with PAFs sections RDP section PAF section 4-SWOT A3- main land use, B-status of habitats and species, C.2 Progress on management plan 5-STRATEGY D1-current experience of EAFRD, F-Strategic conservation priorities 8-MEASURES SELECTED G-description of key measures 10-FINANCING PLAN E-Current Estimate of financial needs 11-INDICATOR PLAN ? 12-ADDITIONAL NATIONAL FINANCING 14-COMPLEMENTARITY WITH LIFE

Overview of the process of Natura 2000 integration during the RDP approval (May 14-Dec 16) -RDP 1st submission stage : For most programmes, very low quality or often incomplete programmes, PAF needs poorly reflected or PAF not mentioned. But good examples. -Commission observation stage : substantial comments from Dg ENV sent : request to complete state of nature, N2K priorities, funding gaps and inbalances in comparison to PAFs, list of measure needed that mirror PAF -Negotiation stage : opportunity to discuss gaps in billateral meetings, active role of nature unit +AGRI, legal basis art 8 help in comparison to other env priorities (biodiversity, soil) -RDP submission stage before adoption : consistence with PAF was a key elements for ENV positive opinion. -Remaining issues after adoption : for RDP modifications, action 9 of Nature action plan.

Overview of the results of PAF integration after RDP approval

Lessons learned for the future -PAFs to be ready in advance of RDPs preparation -PAFs need to identify priorities and funding needs which are specific to the AGRI fund -Most important is the list of needs for agrienvironmental measures, for species and habitats which are agriculture related -targets (area and money) are crucial to give arguments tp evaluate the effort of the RDP to fund Natura, to rebalance the RDPs between N2K measures/light green measures/NCAs -CAP legal texts should include clear obligations for RDPs to reflect the PAFs needs -Solutions to find for discrepancy : national PAFs vs regional RDPs

Opportunities for Natura 2000 in CAP communication -A modernised CAP should enhance its EU added value by reflecting a higher level of environmental and climate ambition. -The new CAP should focus more on results -Policy Coherence =contributing to the achievement of EU environmental objectives= Nature objectives -Natura 2000 Planning tools (PAFS and management plans listed and to be taken into account ) -"the one size fit all" approach is removed to ensure a clear environmental link for actions taken -Specific measures exploration : conservation of permanent pastures, maintenance and creation of landscape features, collective schemes aimed at biodiversity -Definition of innovation caters for nature based solutions -The Commission approves CAP Strategic Plans More info https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/future-of-cap/future_of_food_and_farming_communication_en.pdf

Thank you for your attention !