© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner
Hospital live Deliveries
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Figure 3. Comparison of class performance
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
UNICEF funded Projects
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics – All Banks
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Teachers Response (N= 11)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 8. Drawing result before game
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.
in the last evaluation of the software
Table 4.5. summary of anovabunder multiple regression
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Significant (2- tailed)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Contrast equality of group means
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 2. Test of Normality
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Table 1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents
Financial Development
Number of questionnaires sent out
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Behavioral strategies
Table 1. Nigeria under-five mortality level and trends ( )
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS
t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval for Mean
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff
MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS
Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 5. Strategies being adopted by the private sector entrepreneurs to remedy the operational challenges in secondary schools Items SA (%) A (%) FA (%) D (%) SD (%) I took bank loan to finance capital project in the school 4 (8.2) 15 (30.6) 9 (18.4) 16 (32.7) 3.47 I ploughed back profit to finance the school 22 (44.9) 5 (10.2) 3 (6.1) 4.04 I increase school fees to meet up operational cost 12 (24.5) 11 (22.4) 2.86 I collected PTA levy for supportive service 10 (20.4) 13 (26.5) 2.91 I received donations/aids from international development partners such as UNESCO, UNICEF, USAID, UNDP etc 2 (4.1) 1 (2.0) (2.1) 7 (14.3) 38 (77.6) 1.41 Cumulative Mean 2.94 Adeolu Joshua AYENI et al. Private Sector Involvement in Education Enterprise and Quality Learning Outcome in Secondary Schools in Ondo State, Nigeria. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 8, 578-587. doi:10.12691/education-4-8-1 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.