CCA1 Binds the Promoter of GI in Vitro and in Vivo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Advertisements

by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
by Hong Hao, Huiling Qi, and Manohar Ratnam
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Dual-Luciferase Activation Assay with Potential Targets of ZmbZIP22.
Jun Wang, Jiang Hu, Qian Qian, Hong-Wei Xue  Molecular Plant 
M. Ushita, T. Saito, T. Ikeda, F. Yano, A. Higashikawa, N. Ogata, U
The 130-bp key region of the promoter of TsVP1 is a direct binding target of TsNAC1. The 130-bp key region of the promoter of TsVP1 is a direct binding.
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
by Kyounghee Lee, Ok-Sun Park, and Pil Joon Seo
Shinsuke Ohba, Xinjun He, Hironori Hojo, Andrew P. McMahon 
Constitutive Expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) Gene Disrupts Circadian Rhythms and Suppresses Its Own Expression  Zhi-Yong Wang, Elaine.
AGL15 Interacts in a Sequence-Specific Manner with a Noncanonical CArG Motif Present in the Regulatory Region of AtGA2ox6.(A) Enrichment of the AtGA2ox6.
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Reversing the TERT promoter mutation to WT reverses the active chromatin marks and alters long-range chromatin interactions. Reversing the TERT promoter.
Supplemental Figure 3 A B C T-DNA 1 2 RGLG1 2329bp 3 T-DNA 1 2 RGLG2
Molecular cloning of pms916 salt hypersensitive T-DNA mutant.
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region influence the expression of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor  Alain Wunsch, M.Sc.,
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
SKIP Interacts with the Paf1 Complex to Regulate Flowering via the Activation of FLC Transcription in Arabidopsis  Ying Cao, Liguo Wen, Zheng Wang, Ligeng.
Validation of ChIP-seq reads.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Arabidopsis MSBP1 Is Activated by HY5 and HYH and Is Involved in Photomorphogenesis and Brassinosteroid Sensitivity Regulation  Shi Qiu-Ming , Yang Xi.
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Repression of MYBL2 by Both microRNA858a and HY5 Leads to the Activation of Anthocyanin Biosynthetic Pathway in Arabidopsis  Yulong Wang, Yiqing Wang,
Mapping of the FD binding site in the AP1 promoter.
RNA-seq results at the SAM
Identification of FD targets by pSUC2::GFP:FD ChIP-seq in Col-0 and ft-10 tsf-1 and pFD::GFP:FD ChIP-seq in fd-2. Identification of FD targets by pSUC2::GFP:FD.
Phosphorylation of FD at T282 modulates flowering time in Arabidopsis.
The C-terminal part of FD binds to a G-box in the SEP3 promoter in vitro. The C-terminal part of FD binds to a G-box in the SEP3 promoter in vitro. A,
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Expression and Histone H4 Acetylation Levels of MAPK6 and WRKY53 in the HDT701 OX and RNAi Plants after M. oryzae Inoculation. Expression and Histone H4.
The Balance between CONSTANS and TEMPRANILLO Activities Determines FT Expression to Trigger Flowering  Cristina Castillejo, Soraya Pelaz  Current Biology 
Binding Preference of PEPR1 and PEPR2 for Pep1-6
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Transcriptional Control of SLC26A4 Is Involved in Pendred Syndrome and Nonsyndromic Enlargement of Vestibular Aqueduct (DFNB4)  Tao Yang, Hilmar Vidarsson,
Recognition of GCC-box of BT4 promoter by ERF11 in vitro and in yeast cells. Recognition of GCC-box of BT4 promoter by ERF11 in vitro and in yeast cells.
DRN and DRNL regulate STM expression via binding to a conserved promoter motif. DRN and DRNL regulate STM expression via binding to a conserved promoter.
Fig. 6. F1 trβ mutants accomplish natural metamorphosis.
Flowering time, biomass, leaf number, and leaf area at flowering of wild-type (WT) and fa plants grown under short- or long-day conditions. Flowering time,
NF-Y binds the −4,425/−4,392 G6PC2 promoter region in vitro.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Structure of the IFL1 Gene and the Nature of the Mutations in the ifl1 Alleles.(A) A schematic representation of the exon and intron organization of the.
ERF12 Binds Directly to the DRE/CRT Element in the DOG1 Promoter.
TDIF-Sensitive Xylem Formation in wox4 Mutants
OsSHI1 Binds Directly to the Promoter Regions of OsTB1 and OsDEP1.
Identification of a ufo1 Candidate Gene from the Mapping Region.
Influence of RdDM on DCL4 Transcript Isoform Expression.
MTB1 Antagonizes MYC2 for DNA Binding.
Cloning, Gene Structure, and Expression Patterns of Nap1 and Pir1 Genes.(A) SSAP detection of LORE-1 element integrations in pir1-1 and nap1-1 mutant plants.
OsbZIP46 Binds to the OsPM1 Promoter and Activates OsPM1 Expression in Vivo. OsbZIP46 Binds to the OsPM1 Promoter and Activates OsPM1 Expression in Vivo.
Exon Skipping in IVD RNA Processing in Isovaleric Acidemia Caused by Point Mutations in the Coding Region of the IVD Gene  Jerry Vockley, Peter K. Rogan,
Wang Long , Mai Yan-Xia , Zhang Yan-Chun , Luo Qian , Yang Hong-Quan  
Fig. 5 Loss of SSU72 function results in early flowering.
The bHLH Transcription Factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 Are Required for Jasmonate- Mediated Inhibition of Flowering in Arabidopsis  Houping Wang, Yang Li,
ROS Generation, Defense Gene Expression, and Histone Acetylation Levels in the HDT701 OX and RNAi Plants.(A) ROS level in HDT701 RNAi plants after flg22.
MTB1 to MTB3 Are Direct Transcriptional Targets of MYC2.
Characterization of Xanthomonas oryzae-Responsive cis-Acting Element in the Promoter of Rice Race-Specific Susceptibility Gene Xa13  Yuan Ting , Li Xianghua.
Mutant TERT promoter displays active histone marks and distinct long-range interactions: A, cell lines that were used in the study with their origin and.
MLK4 Is Required for H2A.Z Deposition and H4 Acetylation.
Transformation of lsf1 Plants with LSF1 Variants.
Rapamycin-Dependent Interaction between TOR-FRB Domain and Hs FKBP12
MED25 and JAZ7 Compete to Interact with MYC2.
Clade 2 ERFs Differentially Bind and Activate a PMT2 Promoter
PIF3 Inhibits the Binding of TCP4 to the Promoters of SAUR Genes and Represses Their Expression. PIF3 Inhibits the Binding of TCP4 to the Promoters of.
Binding of TCP4-Like Proteins to the SAUR Promoters Is Enhanced by Light Signal or the Lack of PIFs. (A) and (B) Light increases the binding of TCP4 to.
Presentation transcript:

CCA1 Binds the Promoter of GI in Vitro and in Vivo. CCA1 Binds the Promoter of GI in Vitro and in Vivo. (A) Representative images of 30-d-old Col-0, cca1-22, mlk4-2, and the cca1-22 mLk4-2 double mutant under a LD photoperiod. (B) The total leaf number of Col-0, cca1-22, mlk4-2, and cca1-22 mLk4-2 plants under LD. Flowering time was assessed by counting the number of rosette leaves and cauline leaves at bolting under LD. Values shown are mean ± sd of total leaves; 42 plants were scored for each line. (C) Gene structure of GI, indicating exons (boxes) and introns (lines). The locations of the gene regions analyzed by ChIP-PCR are marked. P1 to P5 indicate regions in the GI promoter, and E1 to E7 indicate the coding region. (D) The amounts of CCA1 at different regions of GI were determined using ChIP-PCR. T10 and T25 are shown in Supplemental Figure 6. The y axis denotes enrichment relative to UBIQUITIN. Experiments were repeated at least three times, and the data from the representative experiments shown are presented as means ± se, n = 3 replicates. (E) Gel shift assay with CCA1 and fragments of the GI promoter region. The binding ability of CCA1 to fragments of the GI promoter (indicated in Supplemental Figure 7) labeled with 32P was assessed, and this binding specificity was tested by adding unlabeled competitor probe. (F) The sequences of probes used for EMSA. The conserved motif, AAAATATCT, is marked in blue, and the mutated nucleotides are marked in red, lowercase letters. (G) and (H) Gel shift assay with CCA1 and different probes. The binding ability of CCA1 to different mutated probes labeled with 32P was assessed, and this binding specificity was tested by adding unlabeled wild-type competitor probe or mutated probe 3. Yanhua Su et al. Plant Cell 2017;29:2197-2213 ©2017 by American Society of Plant Biologists