Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 6. State Science & Technology Councils in India

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

Instructional materials

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 7. Clinical Practice

Table 3. Shared Governance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

in the last evaluation of the software

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. Population by University

Appendix A Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ)

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 5. Organizational Procedures

Table 9. The proposed administrative procedures

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Geometry and Mensuration

Table 1. Students` responses

Table 5. Response on Indicators for Emotion focused Coping Techniques

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning Sl. No. Statement Strongly Agree Agree Undecided disagree Strongly disagree 1 I use Internet for self study 2 I download learning content from Internet 3 I prefer to read e-book 4 I download picture, diagram for my projects 5 I face many problems while using internet 6 I use online library for self study 7 I prefer to transfer material through e-mail to my friends, teachers 8 I feel satisfied when material is collected from Internet 9 I learn many things from Internet through trial-error method 10 Online learning is much more comfortable 11 I use different educational blogs for interaction Dhiman Kar et al. Attitude of University Students towards E-learning in West Bengal. American Journal of Educational Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 8, 669-673. doi:10.12691/education-2-8-16 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.