post intervention (n=60)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 5. KAP score by community

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)

Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics – All Banks

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

% Asian/Pacific Islander

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 1. The Demographic Characteristics

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

Table 7. Clinical Practice

Table 3. Shared Governance

Knowledge about elderly care

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

During hospitalization

Table 1. Mean score of GAP perception of the farmers’ understanding

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Distribution of responses to the knowledge questions.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 5, doi: /ajphr-5-5-5

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Experience of primary school teachers

Table 1. Nigeria under-five mortality level and trends ( )

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Drug use among family members and friends of the students

Socio-demographic data

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

Days without gluten challenge

reported practices score pre/post intervention

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

erythematous disease pre and post intervention (n=60)

Twice daily regimen N=45 MDI regimen N=28 P Value

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

post intervention (n=60) Table 3. Mean knowledge scores of the studied clients regarding systemic lupus erythematous disease pre and post intervention (n=60) Knowledge Score Pre-intervention Post-intervention Paired t test P value Mean ±SD Definition of systemic lupus 1 .6500±.48099 .8500±.36008 -2.352 <0.05* Causes of systemic lupus .4333±.49972 -5.217 <0.001** Risk factors of systemic lupus 2 .5500±.50169 1.6667±.47538 -14.106 Signs and symptoms of systemic lupus 7 2.9167±1.38137 5.9333±.77824 -13.726 Diagnostic tests of systemic lupus 4 1.9500±.69927 3.7333±.44595 -17.171 Treatment of systemic lupus 2.2667±.73338 3.8167±.39020 -15.192 Complications of systemic lupus 11 5.8333±1.32980 10.0000±.86358 -18.776 Total knowledge 30 14.6000±2.38071 26.8500±1.77387 -33.790 * Statistically significant difference (p≤0.05), **Highly statistically significant difference (p≤0.001). Doaa Mohamed Sobhy Elsayed et al. Effect of Health Education based Intervention on Self-care among Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Clients. American Journal of Nursing Research, 2018, Vol. 6, No. 3, 105-112. doi:10.12691/ajnr-6-3-4 © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Science and Education Publishing.