In Vivo Interaction Between AtPIP2;1 and GRFs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Advertisements

Role of C-terminal phosphorylation in the subcellular localization of AtPIP2;1 in response to salinity. Role of C-terminal phosphorylation in the subcellular.
by Chong-Shan Shi, Joseph Tuscano, and John H. Kehrl
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Pirh2 promotes p73 ubiquitination in vivo.
by Guang Yang, Shu-Ching Huang, Jane Y. Wu, and Edward J. Benz
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (March 2008)
TsNAC1 regulated the growth of T. halophila.
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Yingqun Huang, Renata Gattoni, James Stévenin, Joan A. Steitz 
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Constitutive Expression of the CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) Gene Disrupts Circadian Rhythms and Suppresses Its Own Expression  Zhi-Yong Wang, Elaine.
TRAF1a and TRAF1b Are Required for Autophagosome Formation.
Communication with the Exon-Junction Complex and Activation of Nonsense-Mediated Decay by Human Upf Proteins Occur in the Cytoplasm  Guramrit Singh, Steffen.
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Figure 3. MAb 19H9 displays broad cross-reactivity with IAV strains of different subtypes. (A), Amino acid sequence ... Figure 3. MAb 19H9 displays broad.
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Zhonglin Mou, Weihua Fan, Xinnian Dong  Cell 
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Transactivator and Structurally Optimized Inducible Lentiviral Vectors
The Drosophila CLOCK Protein Undergoes Daily Rhythms in Abundance, Phosphorylation, and Interactions with the PER–TIM Complex  Choogon Lee, Kiho Bae,
Yizhong Wang, Xiaofeng Gu, Wenya Yuan, Robert J. Schmitz, Yuehui He 
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Yujun Ren, Yanyun Li, Youqiao Jiang, Binghua Wu, Ying Miao 
p38 MAPK activation is required for phosphorylation of Akt at Ser473.
Phosphorylation of FD at T282 modulates flowering time in Arabidopsis.
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Analysis of GFP expression in gfp loss-of-function mutants.
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Autophagy Is Accelerated by Nitrogen or Fixed-Carbon Starvation in Maize.(A) atg12 mutants block the release of free YFP from YFP-ATG8a. Autophagy Is Accelerated.
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
Effect of expression of constitutively active CAMKK2 on AMPK activation and the cell cycle in G361 cells. Effect of expression of constitutively active.
AtGnTI-Q23A fusion protein expression does not restore the n-glycan processing defect of gntI. AtGnTI-Q23A fusion protein expression does not restore the.
Numerical analysis of cell morphology of tapetal cells in wild type.
Characterisation of eSRS21 protein using an anti-eSRS21 antibody.
Figure 4 DNM1 mutations affect protein levels and self-dimerization (A) HeLa cells were transfected with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged mutant.
Fig. 3 BIC1 and BIC2 inhibit early photoreactions of cryptochromes.
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (March 2002)
Expression of IP3R subtypes in HEK cells.
GOLPH3 interacts with COG complex proteins.
SlMYB21 Encodes an Active Transcription Factor That Interacts With SlJAZ9 and Complements the Arabidopsis Mutant myb21-5. SlMYB21 Encodes an Active Transcription.
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Mutant MFN2 proteins have normal half-lives and are properly localized to mitochondria. Mutant MFN2 proteins have normal half-lives and are properly localized.
Analysis of PHO1 Expression by RT-qPCR in the pru1 Mutant, Complementation Lines (COM5 and COM7), and Wild-type Plants during Pi Starvation. Analysis of.
Key functional sites of SPINDLIN1 could be phosphorylated by Aurora-A.
Osmotic Stress Affects S6K1 Kinase Activity. (A) Leaves of tobacco (N
ABA Signaling in Guard Cells Entails a Dynamic Protein–Protein Interaction Relay from the PYL-RCAR Family Receptors to Ion Channels  Sung Chul Lee, Chae.
Requirement for the PDZ Domain Protein, INAD, for Localization of the TRP Store- Operated Channel to a Signaling Complex  Jorge Chevesich, Andrew J. Kreuz,
PKCζ is tyrosine phosphorylated by EGF and contributes to EGF-induced activation of ERK in Mef cells. PKCζ is tyrosine phosphorylated by EGF and contributes.
Autophagy Activation Is Mediated by the Secretion of T3Es.
Dose-Dependent Effects of GRF4 and GRF10 on AtPIP2;1 Activity in Xenopus Oocytes. Dose-Dependent Effects of GRF4 and GRF10 on AtPIP2;1 Activity in Xenopus.
OsSHI1 Physically Interacts with IPA1.
Effect of bevacizumab on the proliferation of A2780 cells.
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 4-14 (January 2008)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Induction of Autophagy Is Dependent on the Delivery of the T3E HopM1.
P. syringae Infection Triggers Proteaphagy.
ABA and ROS Are Required for GmSIN1 to Enhance Salt Tolerance and Root Growth. ABA and ROS Are Required for GmSIN1 to Enhance Salt Tolerance and Root Growth.
Transformation of lsf1 Plants with LSF1 Variants.
Rapamycin-Dependent Interaction between TOR-FRB Domain and Hs FKBP12
Kros of Single grf Knockout Mutants.
Pst Activates Autophagy to Enhance Plant Susceptibility.
RRC1 Interacts with phyB and Colocalizes in Nuclear Photobodies.
MED25 and JAZ7 Compete to Interact with MYC2.
Circadian Rhythms of Kros and AQP Phosphorylation.
PIF3 Inhibits the Binding of TCP4 to the Promoters of SAUR Genes and Represses Their Expression. PIF3 Inhibits the Binding of TCP4 to the Promoters of.
Binding of TCP4-Like Proteins to the SAUR Promoters Is Enhanced by Light Signal or the Lack of PIFs. (A) and (B) Light increases the binding of TCP4 to.
Presentation transcript:

In Vivo Interaction Between AtPIP2;1 and GRFs In Vivo Interaction Between AtPIP2;1 and GRFs. (A) and (B) Wild type (WT; Col-0) or transgenic plants expressing the dSA or dSD forms of GFP-PIP2;1 (A) or fusions of GFP with GRF4 or GRF10 (B) were cultivated in vitro for 2 weeks before transfer to soil for... In Vivo Interaction Between AtPIP2;1 and GRFs. (A) and (B) Wild type (WT; Col-0) or transgenic plants expressing the dSA or dSD forms of GFP-PIP2;1 (A) or fusions of GFP with GRF4 or GRF10 (B) were cultivated in vitro for 2 weeks before transfer to soil for two additional weeks under LD conditions. Leaves were harvested at ZT35 in plants grown under either condition (LD35, DD35). Immunoprecipitations were performed in the absence (− anti-GFP) or presence (+ anti-GFP) of an anti-GFP antibody. The proteins were further analyzed by protein gel blot (protein gel blot; WB) analysis using anti-GRF4 [(A), top], anti-GRF10 [(A), bottom], or anti-PIP2 (B) antibodies. All lanes were loaded with 10 µg of proteins. Arrowheads indicate the expected molecular weight of monomeric forms of GRF4 or GRF10 (A) or monomeric and dimeric forms of PIP2 (B). The above experiments were repeated twice with similar results. (C) BiFC analysis of PIP2;1-GRF complexes in oocytes. Oocytes were injected with 2.5 ng cRNA of the dSA or dSD forms of cYFP-PIP2;1 in the absence (H2O) or presence of 2.5 ng cRNA of CIPK10, AtPIP2;1, GRF4, or GRF10 fused to NYFP. Oocytes expressing dSA or dSD and GRF linked by BiFC are shown and compared with oocytes injected with H2O. CIPK10-NYFP and NYFP-PIP2;1 were used as negative and positive controls, respectively, for fluorescence complementation with the forms of cYFP-PIP2;1. Representative data from one batch of oocytes are shown, with each bar representing mean + se from 5 to 10 oocytes. The significance of fluorescence complementation was tested using ANOVA with a generalized linear model followed by a simultaneous test for general linear hypotheses taking the H2O series as a reference (NS, not significant; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001). Note that the data sets for dSA cYFP-PIP2;1 and dSA cYFP-PIP2;1 were acquired independently and cannot be compared. A.U., arbitrary units. Karine Prado et al. Plant Cell 2019;31:417-429 ©2019 by American Society of Plant Biologists